| Literature DB >> 25827419 |
Giuseppe Ianiri, Alexander Idnurm1.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Fungal diseases represent a major burden to health care globally. As with other pathogenic microbes, there is a limited number of agents suitable for use in treating fungal diseases, and resistance to these agents can develop rapidly. Cryptococcus neoformans is a basidiomycete fungus that causes cryptococcosis worldwide in both immunocompromised and healthy individuals. As a basidiomycete, it diverged from other common pathogenic or model ascomycete fungi more than 500 million years ago. Here, we report C. neoformans genes that are essential for viability as identified through forward and reverse genetic approaches, using an engineered diploid strain and genetic segregation after meiosis. The forward genetic approach generated random insertional mutants in the diploid strain, the induction of meiosis and sporulation, and selection for haploid cells with counterselection of the insertion event. More than 2,500 mutants were analyzed, and transfer DNA (T-DNA) insertions in several genes required for viability were identified. The genes include those encoding the thioredoxin reductase (Trr1), a ribosome assembly factor (Rsa4), an mRNA-capping component (Cet1), and others. For targeted gene replacement, the C. neoformans homologs of 35 genes required for viability in ascomycete fungi were disrupted, meiosis and sporulation were induced, and haploid progeny were evaluated for their ability to grow on selective media. Twenty-one (60%) were found to be required for viability in C. neoformans. These genes are involved in mitochondrial translation, ergosterol biosynthesis, and RNA-related functions. The heterozygous diploid mutants were evaluated for haploinsufficiency on a number of perturbing agents and drugs, revealing phenotypes due to the loss of one copy of an essential gene in C. neoformans. This study expands the knowledge of the essential genes in fungi using a basidiomycete as a model organism. Genes that have no mammalian homologs and are essential in both Cryptococcus and ascomycete human pathogens would be ideal for the development of antifungal drugs with broad-spectrum activity. IMPORTANCE: Fungal infections are very common in humans but may be neglected due to misdiagnosis and inattention. Cryptococcus neoformans is a yeast that infects mainly immunocompromised people, causing high mortality rates in developing countries. The fungus infects the lungs, crosses the blood-brain barrier, and invades the cerebrospinal fluid, causing fatal meningitis. C. neoformans infections are treated with amphotericin B, flucytosine, and azoles, all developed decades ago. However, problems with antifungal agents highlight the urgent need for more-effective drugs to treat C. neoformans and other invasive fungal infections. These issues include the negative side effects of amphotericin B, the spontaneous resistance of C. neoformans to azoles, and the inefficacy of the echinocandin antifungals. In this study, we report the identification of C. neoformans essential genes as targets for the development of novel antifungals. Because of the level of evolutionary divergence between C. neoformans and the ascomycetes, a subset of these genes is likely essential in all fungi. Genes identified in this study represent an excellent starting point for the future development of new antifungals by pharmaceutical companies.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25827419 PMCID: PMC4453551 DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02334-14
Source DB: PubMed Journal: MBio Impact factor: 7.867
FIG 1 Overview of the genetic screen procedure (1). The diploid C. neoformans strain is transformed with Agrobacterium T-DNA molecules that confer nourseothricin resistance (NATR) (2). The NAT gene can integrate into essential genes or nonessential regions (3a and b). The strains are induced to undergo meiosis, and the basidiospores are plated onto medium with nourseothricin and 5-fluoroorotic acid. The primary screen results are confirmed by Mendelian genetic analysis on basidiospores by micromanipulation.
FIG 2 Molecular analysis of insertional mutants. (A) Representative Southern blot analysis of 19 transformants selected in the primary screen. Genomic DNAs were digested with ClaI, which does not cut inside the T-DNA region, and hybridized with the ORF of the NAT gene. Each hybridization band corresponds to one T-DNA insertion. (B) PCR analysis to score the presence of the MATα, MATa, and NAT genes in five transformants (lanes 2 to 6) that were not able to produce sexual structures. Lane 1 is the diploid strain AI187 of C. neoformans, and lane 7 represents the negative control. Asterisks in lanes 2 and 6 indicate insertional mutants 2aGI646 and 2aGIPlate17H3, respectively; both of them did not yield NATR haploid progeny following backcrosses with KN99α (Fig. 3D) and KN99a, respectively.
FIG 3 Representative examples of mutants with insertions in essential genes identified by forward genetic screens. In all cases, the diagrams of the structure of the genes indicate exons in light gray, introns in white, and UTRs in dark gray. The first colony in the top left corner of all the panels represents the original heterozygous mutant from which the progeny analyzed comes. (A) (A.1) In mutant 1d53, the T-DNA inserted in the final exon of TRR1 and the allele replacing the complete ORF was generated through specific homologous recombination. (A.2) The inset small colony is trr1, while the large colony edge is from the wild-type strain. (A.3) Seventeen basidiospore progeny isolated for the heterozygous TRR1/trr1Δ strain were unable to grow on nourseothricin medium, indicating the deletion allele as inviable. (B) (B.1) In strain 2aGIPlate18E5, the T-DNA inserted in the eighth exon of RSA4 and a RSA4/rsa4Δ targeted mutant was generated. (B.2) The RSA/rsa4 insertional mutant was unable to form chains of haploid basidiospores, whereas the RSA4/rsa4Δ deletion mutant underwent meiosis and produced basidiospores. (B.3) Segregation analysis revealed that RSA4 is an essential gene, as shown by the loss of the NAT-dominant marker in the progeny. (C) In the insertional mutant 2aBIO2E9 generated through biolistic transformation, the NAT insertion caused a 2,139-bp deletion involving the 5′ regions of two adjacent genes, asl1 and ATG4. (C.1) On the left are represented the wild-type structures of the two genes, while on the right are shown the genes lacking the 5′ regions replaced by NAT (black arrow). Genetic segregation analysis of progeny isolated from 2aBIO2E9 shows that this mutant is likely aneuploid as no ura5 and ade2 progeny were obtained. (C.2) Also, the absence of growth on nourseothricin indicates that the mutation does not allow for the isolation of viable homozygous progeny. (D) (D.1) Transformant 2aGI646 had a T-DNA insertion in the 5′ UTR of CNAG_03404 encoding a protein of unknown function. (D.2) The mutant was also unable to grow on YNB without adenine and was thus aneuploid for the ADE2-containing chromosome and unable to produce chains of basidiospores because of the missing MATα allele (this is shown in Fig. 2B, lane 2). (D.3) After crosses with KN99α, dissected haploid progeny showed regular segregation only for the NAT and the MAT markers. The absence of growth on nourseothricin indicates that transformant 2aGI646 produces NATR progeny that are inviable.
C. neoformans heterozygous insertional mutants generating inviable progeny identified through forward genetics
| H99 Broad annotation | Gene name | T-DNA | Description | No. of germinated | NATR | Essential in | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| One | |||||||
| id2 | CNAG_01141 | ORF | Exosome complex | 24/46 | 0 | Yes | |
| id53 | CNAG_05847 | ORF | Thioredoxin-disulfide | 17/27 | 0 | Yes | |
| | CNAG_05847 | NA | Thioredoxin-disulfide | 9/36 | 0 | Yes | |
| 2a445 | CNAG_01800 | NA | 5-bp 5′ UTR | Related to | 21/36 | 0 | NA |
| 2aGIPlate14C8 | CNAG_03368 | ORF | Microtubule-associated | 7/34 | 0 | Yes | |
| 2aGIPlate18E5 | CNAG_ 04117 | ORF | Ribosome biogenesis | NA | NA | Yes | |
| | CNAG_ 04117 | NA | Ribosome biogenesis | 10/42 | 0 | Yes | |
| 2aBIO2E9 | CNAG_02661- | ORF-ORF | 17/24 | 0 | No-no | ||
| 2a63 | CNAG_02033/ | chr6:chr8 | Arp2/3 complex subunit/ | 27/90 | 0 | Yes/no | |
| 2a129 | CNAG_00194/ | NA/ | chr1:chr5 | Hypothetical protein/ | 13/73 | 0 | No/no |
| 2a46 | CNAG_07485/NA | chr2:chr8 | Membrane protein/NA | 17/35 | 0 | No/NA | |
| 2aBIO1F11 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 22/36 | 0 | NA |
| 2aGIPlate17H3 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 10/30 | 0 | NA |
| Two | |||||||
| 2aPlate2D9 | CNAG_06548- | ORF-ORF | Endoplasmic reticulum protein– | 10/25 | 0 | No-yes | |
| 2aPlate4C11 | CNAG_03105 | NA | ORF | Hypothetical protein | 14/36 | 0 | NA |
| 2aGI646 | CNAG_03404 | NA | 5′ UTR | Hypothetical protein | 27/33 | 0 | NA |
| 2a13 | CNAG_07485/ | chr2:chr8 | Membrane protein/ | 4/16 | 0 | No/no |
The hyphen or dash in columns 2, 3, 4, and 5 indicates two adjacent genes; the slash (/) indicates genes originally located in different chromosomes (chromosomal rearrangements).
The S. pombe orthologs are indicated in italic lowercase.
The distance from the closest 5′ or 3′ UTR is indicated in base pairs.
Gene description is based on the C. neoformans H99 Broad database. Where it was not available, the description of the S. cerevisiae or S. pombe ortholog was used.
Phenotype assessed after backcross of a NATR progeny with the opposite mating type of KN99.
For mutants 2aGI646 and 2aGIPlate17H3, PCR revealed the presence of only one MAT allele. In these aneuploid mutants, sexual reproduction was restored by crossing with the opposite mating type of the congenic KN99 pair, and for both of them, haploid basidiospores were unable to grow on selective medium containing nourseothricin.
NA, not available.
chr, chromosome.
Essential S. cerevisiae and/or S. pombe orthologs selected for targeted replacement in C. neoformans and genetic analysis of the heterozygous mutants generated
| Gene name | Locus (H99 | H99 Broad description | No. of germinated | NATR
| GO biological | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNAG_07884 | Hypothetical protein with | 9/40 | 0 | Inviable | Mitochondrial | |
| CNAG_06325 | GTPase activator | 31/37 | 0 | Inviable | Mitotic spindle | |
| CNAG_02034 | Hypothetical protein with a | 9/39 | 0 | Inviable | Regulation of | |
| CNAG_04939 | Hypothetical protein with | 9/34 | 0 | Inviable | Septation | |
| CNAG_06549 | mRNA-capping enzyme | 10/48 | 0 | Inviable | 7-Methylguanosine | |
| CNAG_06001 | Phosphomevalonate | 17/44 | 0 | Inviable | Ergosterol | |
| CNAG_06770 | Fructose-bisphosphate | 13/36 | 0 | Inviable | Glycolysis | |
| CNAG_02786 | Dihydropteroate synthase | 10/56 | 0 | Inviable | Tetrahydrofolate | |
| CNAG_03305 | Calcium binding | 21/95 | 1 | Inviable | Component of | |
| CNAG_05013 | RNP domain-containing | 25/48 | 0 | Inviable | RNA-binding protein | |
| CNAG_00101 | Hypothetical protein with | 9/38 | 0 | Inviable | Inositolphosphoceramide | |
| CNAG_03832 | Alpha-1,2- | 24/34 | 13 | Viable | Cell wall mannoprotein | |
| CNAG_06345 | Mitochondrial distribution | 7/23 | 3 | Viable | ER component of | |
| CNAG_02304 | Mitochondrial distribution | 21/38 | 9 | Viable | ER component of | |
| CNAG_04267 | Mitochondrial genome | 10/40 | 0 | Inviable | DNA repair | |
| CNAG_05557 | Mitochondrial outer | 33/48 | 12 | Viable | ER component of | |
| CNAG_01650 | Large subunit ribosomal | 25/39 | 6 | Viable | Mitochondrial | |
| CNAG_04332 | Large subunit ribosomal | 9/37 | 1 | Inviable | Mitochondrial | |
| CNAG_04334 | Hypothetical protein with a | 6/32 | 0 | Inviable | Mitochondrial | |
| CNAG_05125 | Diphosphomevalonate | 12/39 | 0 | Inviable | Ergosterol | |
| CNAG_03986 | Nam9 protein | 14/45 | 0 | Inviable | Mitochondrial | |
| CNAG_03223 | Hypothetical protein with a | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
| CNAG_04659 | Pyruvate decarboxylase | 24/39 | 9 | Viable | Pyruvate | |
| CNAG_06467 | Hypothetical protein with | 25/50 | 10 | Viable | Riboflavin | |
| CNAG_02506 | 3,4-Dihydroxy-2-butanone- | 34/70 | 13 | Viable | Riboflavin | |
| CNAG_06744 | Chromatin structure- | 11/29 | 6 | Viable | Chromatin | |
| CNAG_04452 | Small subunit ribosomal | 15/37 | 0 | Inviable | Mitochondrial | |
| CNAG_03338 | Hypothetical protein with | 21/33 | 9 | Viable | Unknown | |
| CNAG_00736 | Exocyst protein | 31/44 | 18 | Viable | Exocyst | |
| CNAG_02564 | tRNA-splicing | 4/42 | 0 | Inviable | tRNA-type intron | |
| CNAG_04247 | Hypothetical protein with | 8/43 | 0 | Inviable | Centrin-binding | |
| CNAG_00592 | Dolichol-phosphate | 24/38 | 21 | Viable | Unknown function | |
| CNAG_01697 | Nuclear pore | 24/42 | 16 | Viable | mRNA export | |
| CNAG_05234 | Mitochondrial import | 32/47 | 0 | Inviable | Protein import into | |
| 20/64 | 0 | Inviable | ||||
| CNAG_01250 | tRNA ligase | 8/73 | 0 | Inviable | tRNA ligase |
Mutant bot1Δ and sen54Δ strains were aneuploid, as PCR revealed the presence of only one MAT allele. In these mutants, sexual reproduction for genetic analysis was restored by crossing with the opposite mating type of the congenic strain KN99 pair.
Phenotype assessed after backcross of a NATR progeny with the opposite mating type of KN99.
For mrpl31Δ and hym1Δ heterozygous mutants, one NATR haploid progeny was obtained. PCR analysis revealed the presence of the wild-type copy of the genes of interest, suggesting that these NATR colonies are aneuploid and that both MRPL31 and HYM1 are required for viability in C. neoformans.
NA, not available.
FIG 4 Representative examples of mutants generated through reverse genetics. In all cases, the first colony in the top left corner of all the panels represents the original heterozygous mutant from which the progeny analyzed originates. (A) Example of aneuploidy of mutant BOT1/bot1Δ strain for the MATa allele. Sexual reproduction in the heterozygous BOT1/bot1Δ strain was restored after the cross with KN99α, and resulting progeny were NATS, indicating that BOT1 is an essential gene. (B) Segregation analysis of progeny derived from MRPL7/mrpl7Δ strain and example of backcross of a NATR colony performed to further assess the essentiality of MRPL7. Thirteen basidiospores germinated from the MRPL7/mrpl7Δ heterozygous mutant, and segregation analysis showed independent assortment for the four genetic markers. (C) Since only 3 NATR basidiospores were obtained, a number lower than the ~50% expected, one NATR ADE2 ura5 MATa progeny (underlined) was backcrossed with KN99α, and the segregation of the four markers was assessed again. Six NATR colonies were obtained, indicating that MRPL7 is not essential for viability. (D) Segregation analysis of progeny derived from the TIM54/tim54Δ#1 heterozygous mutant; the generation of NATS progeny indicates that TIM54 is an essential gene. (E and F) Lack of sexual structures for PWP1/pwp1Δ heterozygous mutant compared to the diploid AI187. Bars, 50 µM. WT, wild type diploid AI187.
FIG 5 Scatter plot analyses showing the similarity between 56 C. neoformans defined or predicted essential genes against S. cerevisiae and H. sapiens (A) and the human pathogens C. albicans and A. fumigatus (B). The similarity is expressed as the negative logarithm of the E values obtained after BLASTp analysis. The higher the value, the higher the similarity, with 200 set as the maximum. 0 is the minimum value, indicating null or extremely low similarity.
FIG 6 Phenotypes of C. neoformans heterozygous and haploid mutants. Tenfold serial dilutions of yeast cells were spotted on agar medium containing several stressors and drugs, as identified in Fig. S5 in the supplemental material. The concentrations of stressors and drugs that gave the phenotypes shown are indicated.