Craig W Trumbo1, Se-Jin Sage Kim2. 1. Department of Journalism and Media Communication, Colorado State University, 1785 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA. Electronic address: ctrumbo@mac.com. 2. Department of Journalism and Media Communication, Colorado State University, 1785 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: . Aside from prohibiting health claims, there are presently no restrictions on electronic cigarette advertising in the U.S. Studies have shown college students have a positive view of e-cigarettes and use on campuses is increasing. The purpose of this study was to test if the appeal of e-cigarette advertisements and beliefs about the addictiveness of e-cigarettes may affect their uptake among college students. METHODS: The study was framed within the Theory of Reasoned Action, which posits that behavioral intention can be understood in terms of social norms and attitudes toward a behavior. We also included variables capturing appeal of e-cigarette advertisements, belief that e-cigarettes are not as addictive as cigarettes, and tobacco use. Attitudes toward e-cigarettes, perceived norms concerning their use, beliefs that e-cigarettes are not as addictive as cigarettes, and positive appraisal of e-cigarette advertising videos were all hypothesized to be independently positively associated with intention to use an e-cigarette. Data were collected through a survey of students at a major U.S. university (participation rate 78%, N=296). Participants were exposed to three e-cigarette video advertisements in random order. RESULTS: In a regression analysis we found positive reaction to the ads and holding the belief that e-cigarettes are not as addictive were both independently associated with intention. Attitudes and norms were also associated but were controlled by inclusion of the other variables. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that advertising may promote the uptake of e-cigarettes and may do so in addition to current smoking and alternate tobacco use status.
INTRODUCTION: . Aside from prohibiting health claims, there are presently no restrictions on electronic cigarette advertising in the U.S. Studies have shown college students have a positive view of e-cigarettes and use on campuses is increasing. The purpose of this study was to test if the appeal of e-cigarette advertisements and beliefs about the addictiveness of e-cigarettes may affect their uptake among college students. METHODS: The study was framed within the Theory of Reasoned Action, which posits that behavioral intention can be understood in terms of social norms and attitudes toward a behavior. We also included variables capturing appeal of e-cigarette advertisements, belief that e-cigarettes are not as addictive as cigarettes, and tobacco use. Attitudes toward e-cigarettes, perceived norms concerning their use, beliefs that e-cigarettes are not as addictive as cigarettes, and positive appraisal of e-cigarette advertising videos were all hypothesized to be independently positively associated with intention to use an e-cigarette. Data were collected through a survey of students at a major U.S. university (participation rate 78%, N=296). Participants were exposed to three e-cigarette video advertisements in random order. RESULTS: In a regression analysis we found positive reaction to the ads and holding the belief that e-cigarettes are not as addictive were both independently associated with intention. Attitudes and norms were also associated but were controlled by inclusion of the other variables. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that advertising may promote the uptake of e-cigarettes and may do so in addition to current smoking and alternate tobacco use status.
Authors: Ban A Majeed; Scott R Weaver; Kyle R Gregory; Carrie F Whitney; Paul Slovic; Terry F Pechacek; Michael P Eriksen Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2016-10-26 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Lauren Collins; Allison M Glasser; Haneen Abudayyeh; Jennifer L Pearson; Andrea C Villanti Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2019-01-01 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Su Hyun Park; Dustin T Duncan; Omar El Shahawy; Lily Lee; Jenni A Shearston; Kosuke Tamura; Scott E Sherman; Michael Weitzman Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2017-08-29 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Andrea C King; Lia J Smith; Daniel J Fridberg; Alicia K Matthews; Patrick J McNamara; Dingcai Cao Journal: Psychol Addict Behav Date: 2015-11-30