Literature DB >> 25826635

Current concepts, classification, and results in short stem hip arthroplasty.

Francesco Falez, Filippo Casella, Matteo Papalia.   

Abstract

Various short hip stems have been introduced with differing implant concepts of femoral fixation and implant length. There is a lack of proper classification for short hip stems, with a clear and accepted definition for implant length and extent of bone preservation in the metaphyseal and diaphyseal femur. This study analyzed the length of short hip stems. Stems were divided into collum, partial collum, and trochanter-sparing implants. An additional category was added, trochanter harming, which was defined as interruption of the circumferential integrity of the femoral neck. For all of the femoral components described, the designs were compared, excluding stems with insufficient clinical data. The 15 finally selected stems were classified as collum (1 stem), partial collum (7 stems), trochanter sparing (4 stems), and trochanter harming (3 stems). Mid-term results (>5 years of follow-up) were available for only 3 designs in the partial collum group. Taking into account the results of short-term studies (<5 years of follow-up), the femoral revision rate per 100 observed component years was <1 for most total hip arthroplasties. However, the studies varied greatly regarding level of significance, and short hip stems without published results are available commercially. Short hip stems cannot be circumscribed by a simple length limit. For some designs, clinical data collected from large patient cohorts showed a survivorship comparable to traditional stems. In cases that must be revised, this often can be performed with a conventional primary stem, fulfilling the promise to preserve bone for potential future revisions in younger patients. Copyright 2015, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25826635     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20150215-50

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  27 in total

1.  Two- to 4-Year Followup of a Short Stem THA Construct: Excellent Fixation, Thigh Pain a Concern.

Authors:  Richard L Amendola; Devon D Goetz; Steve S Liu; John J Callaghan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Periprosthetic bone remodelling of short-stem total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Shuang G Yan; Patrick Weber; Arnd Steinbrück; Xingyi Hua; Volkmar Jansson; Florian Schmidutz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  What is the fate of the neck after a collum femoris preserving prosthesis? a nineteen years single center experience.

Authors:  Matteo Formica; Luca Cavagnaro; Marco Basso; Andrea Zanirato; Augusto Palermo; Lamberto Felli
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-11-26       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  MINIMA Short Stem Versus Standard Profemur (TL) Stem in Primary Total Hip Replacement: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Stylianos Tottas; Athanasios Ververidis; Ioannis Kougioumtzis; Konstantinos Tilkeridis; Christina Tsigalou; Makrina Karaglani; Georgios Drosos
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-04-02

5.  Short-term clinical and radiological results of two different design metaphyseal fitting femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  I Tatani; K Solou; A Panagopoulos; J Lakoumentas; A Kouzelis; P Megas
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Short versus conventional stem in cementless total hip arthroplasty : An evidence-based approach with registry data of mid-term survival.

Authors:  Arnd Steinbrück; Alexander W Grimberg; Johanna Elliott; Oliver Melsheimer; Volkmar Jansson
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Short neck-preserving femoral stem for total hip arthroplasty: medium-term results of a 68-case series.

Authors:  Marta Del Río-Arteaga; Jesús Payo-Ollero; Mercedes Vallejo; David Serrano-Toledano; Boris García-Benítez; Juan Ribera
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 2.928

Review 8.  Implant Design in Cementless Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jung Taek Kim; Jeong Joon Yoo
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2016-06-30

9.  Bone preserving level of osteotomy in short-stem total hip arthroplasty does not influence stress shielding dimensions - a comparing finite elements analysis.

Authors:  Rene Burchard; Sabrina Braas; Christian Soost; Jan Adriaan Graw; Jan Schmitt
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Study of the bone behavior around a neck preserving short stem implant: bone densitometric analysis over a span of two years.

Authors:  Tarek Abdel Shafy; Adel Sayed; Ahmed H Abdelazeem
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2016-10-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.