Literature DB >> 27889839

What is the fate of the neck after a collum femoris preserving prosthesis? a nineteen years single center experience.

Matteo Formica1, Luca Cavagnaro2, Marco Basso1, Andrea Zanirato1, Augusto Palermo3, Lamberto Felli1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of our study is to evaluate long-term outcomes from a cohort of patients treated with collum femoris preserving (CFP) stem correlating neck resorption with comorbidities, clinical outcomes, and complications.
METHODS: One hundred seventy-six patients (194 hips) were retrospectively reviewed with a minimum follow-up (f.u.) of ten years. Demographic and surgical data were collected. Clinical and radiological evaluation was performed at the last follow up. We calculated a neck resorption ratio (NRR) for each patient. Main complications were recorded. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS: The mean Harris hip score (HHS) was 89.1 ± 5.7. The mean visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oxford hip score (OHS) values were 1.1 ± 1 and 41.3 ± 5.1, respectively. The mean leg length discrepancy was 1.5 mm ± 1.9. The mean NRR was 0.35. We observed six cases of aseptic loosening, two cases of infection, one implant revision for recurrent dislocation, and one stem revision after periprosthetic femoral fracture. The overall survival rate of the stem was 94.8%. Statistically significant associations were found between NRR and steroid therapy/stem malposition. Correlation between aseptic loosening and NRR was also statistically significant. Correlations between NRR and HHS/OHS were -0.34 and -0.28 respectively. Odds ratio for aseptic loosening were: 4.6 if NRR > 0.25; 16.9 if > 0.50 and 24.1 if > 0.75.
CONCLUSION: CFP hip stem provided excellent long-term outcomes. NRR is correlated to steroid therapy and stem malposition. The risk of stem aseptic loosening rises according to NRR increase. Patients with an NRR > 0.5, especially if under steroid therapy or with stem malposition, should be strictly monitored.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aseptic loosening; CFP; Neck preservation; Tissue sparing surgery; Total hip arthroplasty; Total hip replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27889839     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-016-3350-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  21 in total

1.  Mid-term results of 155 patients treated with a collum femoris preserving (CFP) short stem prosthesis.

Authors:  Daniel Briem; Michael Schneider; Nicole Bogner; Nadine Botha; Matthias Gebauer; Thorsten Gehrke; Bernd Schwantes
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-05-02       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Favorable Results of a Short, Tapered, Highly Porous, Proximally Coated Cementless Femoral Stem at a Minimum 4-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Anthony Albers; Ahmed A Aoude; David J Zukor; Olga L Huk; John Antoniou; Michael Tanzer
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  [Medium-term results of the Mayo™ short-stem hip prosthesis after avascular necrosis of the femoral head].

Authors:  A Zeh; A Weise; A Vasarhelyi; A G Bach; D Wohlrab
Journal:  Z Orthop Unfall       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 0.923

Review 4.  Has total hip arthroplasty in patients 30 years or younger improved? A systematic review.

Authors:  Muyibat A Adelani; James A Keeney; Allison Palisch; Susan A Fowler; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Femoral neck preservation in total hip replacement.

Authors:  F Pipino; L Molfetta
Journal:  Ital J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  1993

6.  "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening.

Authors:  T A Gruen; G M McNeice; H C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  A conservative femoral replacement for total hip arthroplasty. A prospective study.

Authors:  B F Morrey; R A Adams; M Kessler
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2000-09

8.  Ten year results of the collum femoris preserving total hip replacement: a prospective cohort study of seventy five patients.

Authors:  Jonathan Hutt; Ziad Harb; Ian Gill; Fadhil Kashif; John Miller; Matthew Dodd
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 9.  Conservative stems in total hip replacement.

Authors:  Ian D Learmonth
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2009 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.135

10.  A prospective cohort study on the short collum femoris-preserving (CFP) stem using RSA and DXA. Primary stability but no prevention of proximal bone loss in 27 patients followed for 2 years.

Authors:  Stergios Lazarinis; Per Mattsson; Jan Milbrink; Hans Mallmin; Nils P Hailer
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  9 in total

1.  Metaphyseal cones and sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty: Two sides of the same coin? Complications, clinical and radiological results-a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  A Zanirato; M Formica; L Cavagnaro; S Divano; G Burastero; L Felli
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2019-03-16

Review 2.  Femoral revision with primary cementless stems: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Luca Cavagnaro; Matteo Formica; Marco Basso; Andrea Zanirato; Stefano Divano; Lamberto Felli
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-07-01

3.  Periprosthetic bone remodelling of short-stem total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Shuang G Yan; Patrick Weber; Arnd Steinbrück; Xingyi Hua; Volkmar Jansson; Florian Schmidutz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Relationships between the femoral neck-preserving ratio and radiologic and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing total-hip arthroplasty with a collum femoris-preserving stem.

Authors:  Zeming Liu; Hongpeng Hu; Sikai Liu; Jia Huo; Mengnan Li; Yongtai Han
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Greater increase in femoral offset with use of collum femoris-preserving stem than Tri-Lock stem in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mengxuan Yao; Yuchuan Wang; Congcong Wei; Yongtai Han; Huijie Li
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.671

6.  A comparison of short-stem prostheses and conventional stem prostheses in primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Zhen Zhang; Qiqi Xing; Jingyi Li; Zichao Jiang; Yixiao Pan; Yihe Hu; Long Wang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-02

7.  Continuous periprosthetic bone loss but preserved stability for a collum femoris-preserving stem: follow-up of a prospective cohort study of 21 patients with dualenergy X-ray absorptiometry and radiostereometric analysis with minimum 8 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Andreas Nyström; Demostenis Kiritopoulos; Hans Mallmin; Stergios Lazarinis
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  Short-Term Functional Outcomes of Short Femoral Neck Stems Are the Same as Those of Conventional Stems in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Rafał Tkacz; Dariusz Larysz; Rafał Przybylski; Marta Tkacz; Krzysztof Safranow; Maciej Tarnowski
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 4.614

9.  Long-term follow-up of a low profile, coated, press-fit cup: the trabeculae oriented pattern (T.O.P.) acetabular system.

Authors:  L Mosconi; L Cavagnaro; A Zanirato; E Quarto; M Lontaro Baracchini; M Formica
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-03-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.