Literature DB >> 25825806

Methodologies for determining the sources, characteristics, distribution, and abundance of asbestiform and nonasbestiform amphibole and serpentine in ambient air and water.

Ann G Wylie1, Philip A Candela.   

Abstract

Anthropogenic and nonanthropogenic (erosion) processes contribute to the continuing presence of asbestos and nonasbestos elongated mineral particles (EMP) of amphibole and serpentine in air and water of urban, rural, and remote environments. The anthropogenic processes include disturbance and deterioration of asbestos-containing materials, mining of amphibole- and serpentine-bearing rock, and disturbance of soils containing amphibole and serpentine. Atmospheric dispersal processes can transport EMP on a global scale. There are many methods of establishing the abundance of EMP in air and water. EMP include cleavage fragments, fibers, asbestos, and other asbestiform minerals, and the methods employed do not critically distinguish among them. The results of most of the protocols are expressed in the common unit of fibers per square centimeter; however, seven different definitions for the term "fiber" are employed and the results are not comparable. The phase-contrast optical method used for occupational monitoring cannot identify particles being measured, and none of the methods distinguish amphibole asbestos from other EMP of amphibole. Measured ambient concentrations of airborne EMP are low, and variance may be high, even for similar environments, yielding data of questionable value for risk assessment. Calculations based on the abundance of amphibole-bearing rock and estimates of asbestos in the conterminous United States suggest that amphibole may be found in 6-10% of the land area; nonanthropogenic erosional processes might produce on the order of 400,000 tons or more of amphibole per year, and approximately 50 g asbestos/km(2)/yr; and the order of magnitude of the likelihood of encountering rock bearing any type of asbestos is approximately 0.0001.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25825806     DOI: 10.1080/10937404.2014.997945

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev        ISSN: 1093-7404            Impact factor:   6.393


  5 in total

Review 1.  The Cappadocia mesothelioma epidemic: its influence in Turkey and abroad.

Authors:  Salih A Emri
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-06

2.  New comprehensive approach for airborne asbestos characterisation and monitoring.

Authors:  Miroslav Klán; Petra Pokorná; David Havlíček; Ondřej Vik; Martin Racek; Jiří Plocek; Jan Hovorka
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Multiwalled carbon nanotube-induced pulmonary inflammatory and fibrotic responses and genomic changes following aspiration exposure in mice: A 1-year postexposure study.

Authors:  Brandi N Snyder-Talkington; Chunlin Dong; Dale W Porter; Barbara Ducatman; Michael G Wolfarth; Michael Andrew; Lori Battelli; Rebecca Raese; Vincent Castranova; Nancy L Guo; Yong Qian
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2016-04-19

Review 4.  Recent Scientific Evidence Regarding Asbestos Use and Health Consequences of Asbestos Exposure.

Authors:  Manuela Valenzuela; Margarita Giraldo; Sonia Gallo-Murcia; Juliana Pineda; Laura Santos; Juan Pablo Ramos-Bonilla
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2016-12

5.  Investigating palygorskite's role in the development of mesothelioma in southern Nevada: Insights into fiber-induced carcinogenicity.

Authors:  David Larson; Amy Powers; Jean-Paul Ambrosi; Mika Tanji; Andrea Napolitano; Erin G Flores; Francine Baumann; Laura Pellegrini; Cormac J Jennings; Brenda J Buck; Brett T McLaurin; Doug Merkler; Cleo Robinson; Paul Morris; Meral Dogan; A Umran Dogan; Harvey I Pass; Sandra Pastorino; Michele Carbone; Haining Yang
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 6.393

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.