| Literature DB >> 27696225 |
Manuela Valenzuela1, Margarita Giraldo1, Sonia Gallo-Murcia1, Juliana Pineda1, Laura Santos1, Juan Pablo Ramos-Bonilla2.
Abstract
To justify the continuous use of two million tons of asbestos every year, it has been argued that a safe/controlled use can be achieved. The aim of this review was to identify recent scientific studies that present empirical evidence of: 1) health consequences resulting from past asbestos exposures and 2) current asbestos exposures resulting from asbestos use. Articles with evidence that could support or reject the safe/controlled use argument were also identified. A total of 155 articles were included in the review, and 87 % showed adverse asbestos health consequences or high asbestos exposures. Regarding the safe/controlled use, 44 articles were identified, and 82 % had evidence suggesting that the safe/controlled use is not being achieved. A large percentage of articles with evidence that support the safe/controlled use argument have a conflict of interest declared. Most of the evidence was developed in high-income countries and in countries that have already banned asbestos.Entities:
Keywords: Asbestos; Conflict of interest; Safe/controlled use; Scientific evidence
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27696225 DOI: 10.1007/s40572-016-0109-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Environ Health Rep ISSN: 2196-5412