| Literature DB >> 25825589 |
Abstract
We discuss the articles of this special issue with reference to an important yet previously only implicit dimension of study quality: alignment across the theoretical and methodological decisions that collectively define an approach to self-regulated learning. Integrating and extending work by leaders in the field, we propose a framework for evaluating alignment in the way self-regulated learning research is both conducted and reported. Within this framework, the special issue articles provide a springboard for discussing methodological promises and pitfalls of increasingly sophisticated research on the dynamic, contingent, and contextualized features of self-regulated learning.Entities:
Keywords: reporting standards; self-regulated learning
Year: 2015 PMID: 25825589 PMCID: PMC4375967 DOI: 10.1007/s11409-015-9136-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Metacogn Learn ISSN: 1556-1623