Literature DB >> 2195086

Hypothesis validity of clinical research.

B E Wampold1, B Davis, R H Good.   

Abstract

Hypothesis validity refers to the extent to which research results reflect theoretically derived predictions about the relations between or among constructs. The role of hypotheses in theory testing is discussed. Four threats to hypothesis validity are presented: (a) inconsequential research hypotheses, (b) ambiguous research hypotheses, (c) noncongruence of research hypotheses and statistical hypotheses, and (d) diffuse statistical hypotheses and tests.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2195086     DOI: 10.1037//0022-006x.58.3.360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol        ISSN: 0022-006X


  7 in total

1.  A Framework for Evaluating and Enhancing Alignment in Self-Regulated Learning Research.

Authors:  Amy L Dent; Rick H Hoyle
Journal:  Metacogn Learn       Date:  2015-04

2.  On the (In)Validity of Tests of Simple Mediation: Threats and Solutions.

Authors:  Jolynn Pek; Rick H Hoyle
Journal:  Soc Personal Psychol Compass       Date:  2016-03-02

3.  Response to Commentaries: A Socioevolutionary Approach to Self-Presentation Modification.

Authors:  Adam C Davis; Steven Arnocky
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-10-28

Review 4.  Posttraumatic growth and optimism in health-related trauma: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lucy Bostock; Alia I Sheikh; Stephen Barton
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2009-12

5.  Advancement of the German version of the moral distress scale for acute care nurses-A mixed methods study.

Authors:  Michael Kleinknecht-Dolf; Elisabeth Spichiger; Marianne Müller; Sabine Bartholomeyczik; Rebecca Spirig
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2017-09-04

6.  Meta-analysis of self-reported health symptoms in 1990-1991 Gulf War and Gulf War-era veterans.

Authors:  Alexis L Maule; Patricia A Janulewicz; Kimberly A Sullivan; Maxine H Krengel; Megan K Yee; Michael McClean; Roberta F White
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Efficacy of new generation antidepressants: differences seem illusory.

Authors:  A C Del Re; Glen I Spielmans; Christoph Flückiger; Bruce E Wampold
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.