Literature DB >> 25824940

Response to ruxolitinib in patients with intermediate-1-, intermediate-2-, and high-risk myelofibrosis: results of the UK ROBUST Trial.

Adam J Mead1, Dragana Milojkovic2, Steven Knapper3, Mamta Garg4, Joseph Chacko5, Mira Farquharson6, John Yin7, Sahra Ali8, Richard E Clark9, Chris Andrews10, Meryem Ktiouet Dawson10, Claire Harrison11.   

Abstract

Myelofibrosis is characterized by splenomegaly and debilitating constitutional symptoms that negatively impact patients' quality of life. ROBUST, a UK, open-label, phase II study, evaluated the safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib in patients with myelofibrosis (N = 48), including intermediate-1 risk patients. The primary composite endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving treatment success [≥ 50% reduction in palpable spleen length and/or a ≥ 50% decrease in Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form Total Symptom Score (MF-SAF TSS)] at 48 weeks. This was the first time that efficacy of ruxolitinib in myelofibrosis has been evaluated based on these criteria and the first time the MF-SAF was used in a population of patients solely from the United Kingdom. Overall, 50% of patients and 57% of intermediate-1 risk patients, achieved treatment success; reductions in spleen length and symptoms were observed in all risk groups. The majority of patients (66.7%) experienced ≥ 50% reductions from baseline in spleen length at any time. Improvements in MF-SAF TSS were seen in 80.0%, 72.7%, and 72.2% of intermediate-1, intermediate-2, and high-risk patients, respectively. Consistent with other studies of ruxolitinib, the most common haematological adverse events were anaemia and thrombocytopenia. Results indicate that most patients with myelofibrosis, including intermediate-1 risk patients, may benefit from ruxolitinib treatment.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Janus kinase inhibitor; Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form; myelofibrosis; ruxolitinib; symptoms

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25824940     DOI: 10.1111/bjh.13379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Haematol        ISSN: 0007-1048            Impact factor:   6.998


  29 in total

1.  How can we know if new drugs are effective in myeloproliferative neoplasm-associated myelofibrosis?

Authors:  G Barosi; R P Gale
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 11.528

2.  Safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib in an open-label, multicenter, single-arm phase 3b expanded-access study in patients with myelofibrosis: a snapshot of 1144 patients in the JUMP trial.

Authors:  Haifa Kathrin Al-Ali; Martin Griesshammer; Philipp le Coutre; Cornelius F Waller; Anna Marina Liberati; Philippe Schafhausen; Renato Tavares; Pilar Giraldo; Lynda Foltz; Pia Raanani; Vikas Gupta; Bayane Tannir; Julian Perez Ronco; Jagannath Ghosh; Bruno Martino; Alessandro M Vannucchi
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 9.941

3.  Ruxolitinib for the management of myelofibrosis: Results of an international physician survey.

Authors:  Martin H Ellis; Maya Koren-Michowitz; Noa Lavi; Alessandro M Vannucchi; Ruben Mesa; Claire N Harrison
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 3.156

Review 4.  Philadelphia chromosome-negative classical myeloproliferative neoplasms: revised management recommendations from European LeukemiaNet.

Authors:  Tiziano Barbui; Ayalew Tefferi; Alessandro M Vannucchi; Francesco Passamonti; Richard T Silver; Ronald Hoffman; Srdan Verstovsek; Ruben Mesa; Jean-Jacques Kiladjian; Rȕdiger Hehlmann; Andreas Reiter; Francisco Cervantes; Claire Harrison; Mary Frances Mc Mullin; Hans Carl Hasselbalch; Steffen Koschmieder; Monia Marchetti; Andrea Bacigalupo; Guido Finazzi; Nicolaus Kroeger; Martin Griesshammer; Gunnar Birgegard; Giovanni Barosi
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 5.  Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Tania Jain; Ruben A Mesa; Jeanne M Palmer
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  A Review of Ruxolitinib for the Treatment of Myelofibrosis: A Critique of the Evidence.

Authors:  Ros Wade; Robert Hodgson; Mousumi Biswas; Melissa Harden; Nerys Woolacott
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Assessing the safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib in a multicenter, open-label study in Japanese patients with myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Norio Komatsu; Keita Kirito; Kazuya Shimoda; Takayuki Ishikawa; Kohshi Ohishi; Kazuma Ohyashiki; Naoto Takahashi; Hikaru Okada; Taro Amagasaki; Toshio Yonezu; Koichi Akashi
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 8.  Novel Therapies in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPN): Beyond JAK Inhibitors.

Authors:  Minas P Economides; Srdan Verstovsek; Naveen Pemmaraju
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 9.  Ruxolitinib dose management as a key to long-term treatment success.

Authors:  Ruben A Mesa; Rami S Komrokji; Srdan Verstovsek
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 10.  Efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in the treatment of patients with myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Cecilia Arana Yi; Constantine S Tam; Srdan Verstovsek
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.404

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.