Literature DB >> 25824269

Does Imaging Technology Cause Cancer? Debunking the Linear No-Threshold Model of Radiation Carcinogenesis.

Jeffry A Siegel1, James S Welsh2.   

Abstract

In the past several years, there has been a great deal of attention from the popular media focusing on the alleged carcinogenicity of low-dose radiation exposures received by patients undergoing medical imaging studies such as X-rays, computed tomography scans, and nuclear medicine scintigraphy. The media has based its reporting on the plethora of articles published in the scientific literature that claim that there is "no safe dose" of ionizing radiation, while essentially ignoring all the literature demonstrating the opposite point of view. But this reported "scientific" literature in turn bases its estimates of cancer induction on the linear no-threshold hypothesis of radiation carcinogenesis. The use of the linear no-threshold model has yielded hundreds of articles, all of which predict a definite carcinogenic effect of any dose of radiation, regardless of how small. Therefore, hospitals and professional societies have begun campaigns and policies aiming to reduce the use of certain medical imaging studies based on perceived risk:benefit ratio assumptions. However, as they are essentially all based on the linear no-threshold model of radiation carcinogenesis, the risk:benefit ratio models used to calculate the hazards of radiological imaging studies may be grossly inaccurate if the linear no-threshold hypothesis is wrong. Here, we review the myriad inadequacies of the linear no-threshold model and cast doubt on the various studies based on this overly simplistic model.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT scans; cancer; linear no-threshold model; low-dose radiation exposure risk; radiation carcinogenesis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25824269     DOI: 10.1177/1533034615578011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 1533-0338


  13 in total

1.  LNT RIP: It is time to bury the linear no threshold hypothesis.

Authors:  Christopher L Hansen; Rittu Hingorani
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Epidemiology Without Biology: False Paradigms, Unfounded Assumptions, and Specious Statistics in Radiation Science (with Commentaries by Inge Schmitz-Feuerhake and Christopher Busby and a Reply by the Authors).

Authors:  Bill Sacks; Gregory Meyerson; Jeffry A Siegel
Journal:  Biol Theory       Date:  2016-06-17

3.  Helical CT with variable target noise levels for dose reduction in chest, abdomen and pelvis CT.

Authors:  Patrik Rogalla; Madhusudan Paravasthu; Christin Farrell; Sonja Kandel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  18F-FDG PET/CT and PET/MRI Perform Equally Well in Cancer: Evidence from Studies on More Than 2,300 Patients.

Authors:  Claudio Spick; Ken Herrmann; Johannes Czernin
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Preserving the Anti-Scientific Linear No-Threshold Myth: Authority, Agnosticism, Transparency, and the Standard of Care.

Authors:  Bill Sacks; Jeffry A Siegel
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 6.  Multiparametric Evaluation of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Using a Single-Source Dual-Energy CT with Fast kVp Switching: State of the Art.

Authors:  Stephanie Lam; Rajiv Gupta; Hillary Kelly; Hugh D Curtin; Reza Forghani
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  Is early treatment for mild adolescent idiopathic scoliosis superior over the traditional 'watch & wait' approach? A case report with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Paul A Oakley
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2018-05-08

8.  It Is Time to Move Beyond the Linear No-Threshold Theory for Low-Dose Radiation Protection.

Authors:  John J Cardarelli; Brant A Ulsh
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 2.658

9.  Evaluation of Blood Parameters Alteration Following Low-dose Radiation Induced by Myocardial Perfusion Imaging.

Authors:  M S Alavi; M A Okhovat; M Atefi; F Khajeh Rahimi; S Mortazavi; F Ebadi
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2018-06-01

10.  Radiophobia: 7 Reasons Why Radiography Used in Spine and Posture Rehabilitation Should Not Be Feared or Avoided.

Authors:  Paul A Oakley; Deed E Harrison
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 2.658

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.