Literature DB >> 2582391

Radionuclide evaluation of dual chamber pacing: comparison between variable AV intervals and ventricular pacing.

R B Leman, J M Kratz.   

Abstract

We prospectively evaluated changes in left ventricular ejection fraction, end diastolic volume, and stroke volume via radionuclide multigated acquisition study. Comparison was made between ventricular pacing and dual chamber pacing with varying AV intervals. The volumes and changes in ejection fraction were determined at rest, at set increased pacing rates, and during physiological stress. AV sequential pacing shows overall improvement in cardiac function in the majority of patients regardless of left ventricular function. The shorter AV interval would be appropriate for the majority of patients who have an atrial tracking mechanism (adequate intrinsic sensed atrial activity followed by ventricular pacing) and who undergo significant physiological stress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 2582391     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1985.tb05780.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  6 in total

1.  Effects of AV-delay optimization on hemodynamic parameters in patients with VDD pacemakers.

Authors:  Konstantin A Krychtiuk; Michael Nürnberg; Romana Volker; Linda Pachinger; Rudolf Jarai; Matthias K Freynhofer; Johann Wojta; Kurt Huber; Thomas W Weiss
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 1.704

2.  Pacing mode and long-term survival in elderly patients with congestive heart failure: 1980-1985.

Authors:  P A Brady; W K Shen; S A Neubauer; S C Hammill; D O Hodge; D L Hayes
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Optimal atrioventricular delay at rest and during exercise in patients with dual chamber pacemakers: a non-invasive assessment by continuous wave Doppler.

Authors:  D Mehta; S Gilmour; D E Ward; A J Camm
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1989-02

4.  Echocardiographic AV-interval optimization in patients with reduced left ventricular function.

Authors:  C Melzer; A C Borges; F Knebel; W S Richter; W Combs; G Baumann; H Theres
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2004-12-17       Impact factor: 2.062

Review 5.  Dual chamber versus single chamber ventricular pacemakers for sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block.

Authors:  J Dretzke; W D Toff; G Y H Lip; J Raftery; A Fry-Smith; R Taylor
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004

6.  PR interval behavior during exercise stress test.

Authors:  J U Lee; K S Kim; J H Kim; H K Lim; B H Lee; C K Lee
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.884

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.