Literature DB >> 24652015

Effects of AV-delay optimization on hemodynamic parameters in patients with VDD pacemakers.

Konstantin A Krychtiuk1, Michael Nürnberg, Romana Volker, Linda Pachinger, Rudolf Jarai, Matthias K Freynhofer, Johann Wojta, Kurt Huber, Thomas W Weiss.   

Abstract

AIM: Atrioventricular (AV) delay optimization improves hemodynamics and clinical parameters in patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy and dual-chamber-pacemakers (PM). However, data on optimizing AV delay in patients treated with VDD-PMs are scarce. We, therefore, investigated the acute and chronic effects of AV delay optimization on hemodynamics in patients treated with VDD-PMs due to AV-conduction disturbances.
METHODS: In this prospective, single-center interventional trial, we included 64 patients (38 men, 26 women, median age: 77 (70-82) years) with implanted VDD-PM. AV-delay optimization was performed using a formula based on the surface electrocardiogram (ECG). Hemodynamic parameters (stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), heart rate (HR), and blood pressure (BP)) were measured at baseline and follow-up after 3 months using impedance cardiography.
RESULTS: Using an ECG formula for AV-delay optimization, the AV interval was decreased from 180 (180-180) to 75 (75-100) ms. At baseline, AV-delay optimization led to a significant increase of both SV (71.3 ± 15.8 vs. 55.3 ± 12.7 ml, p < 0.001, for optimized AV delay vs. nominal AV interval, respectively) and CO (5.1 ± 1.4 vs. 3.9 ± 1.0 l/min, p < 0.001), while HR and BP remained unchanged. At follow-up, the improvement in CO remained stable (4.9 ± 1.3 l/min, p = 0.09), while SV slightly, but significantly, decreased (to 65.1 ± 17.6, p < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: AV-delay optimization in patients treated with VDD-PMs exhibits immediate beneficial effects on hemodynamic parameters that are sustained for 3 months.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24652015     DOI: 10.1007/s00508-014-0520-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr        ISSN: 0043-5325            Impact factor:   1.704


  29 in total

1.  Long-term follow-up of DDD and VDD pacing: a prospective non-randomized single-centre comparison of patients with symptomatic atrioventricular block.

Authors:  Sébastien Marchandise; Christophe Scavée; Jean-Benoit le Polain de Waroux; Christophe de Meester; Jean-Louis Vanoverschelde; Nadia Debbas
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 5.214

2.  Immediate and chronic effects of AV-delay optimization in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Stefan E Hardt; Said Hashem Fani Yazdi; Alexander Bauer; Arthur Filusch; Grigorios Korosoglou; Alexander Hansen; Raffi Bekeredjian; Philipp Ehlermann; Andrew Remppis; Hugo A Katus; Helmut F Kuecherer
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 4.164

Review 3.  Impedance cardiography for cardiac output estimation in pacemaker patients: review of the literature.

Authors:  I Ovsyshcher; S Furman
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 1.976

4.  Impedance cardiography as a noninvasive technique for atrioventricular interval optimization in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Martin U Braun; Andreas Schnabel; Thomas Rauwolf; Matthias Schulze; Ruth H Strasser
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Electrical optimization of cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart failure is associated with improved clinical long-term outcome.

Authors:  Christopher Adlbrecht; Martin Hülsmann; Marianne Gwechenberger; Senta Graf; Franz Wiesbauer; Guido Strunk; Cesar Khazen; Isabella Brodnjak; Stephanie Neuhold; Thomas Binder; Gerald Maurer; Richard Pacher
Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 4.686

6.  Cardiac output-based versus empirically programmed AV interval--how different are they?

Authors:  E Crystal; I E Ovsyshcher
Journal:  Europace       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.214

7.  Randomized prospective trial of atrioventricular delay programming for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Navinder S Sawhney; Alan D Waggoner; Sanjeev Garhwal; Mohit K Chawla; Judy Osborn; Mitchell N Faddis
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.343

8.  Evaluation of atrial conduction time at various sites of right atrial pacing and influence on atrioventricular delay optimization by surface electrocardiography.

Authors:  Bernhard Strohmer; Max Pichler; Martin Froemmel; Mario Migschitz; Florian Hintringer
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.976

9.  Impedance cardiography: a useful and reliable tool in optimization of cardiac resynchronization devices.

Authors:  Konstantin M Heinroth; Marcel Elster; Sebastian Nuding; Frithjof Schlegel; Arnd Christoph; Justin Carter; Michael Buerke; Karl Werdan
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 5.214

10.  Cost-effectiveness of dual-chamber pacemaker therapy: does single lead VDD pacing reduce treatment costs of atrioventricular block?

Authors:  U K Wiegand; J Potratz; F Bode; R Schreiber; H Bonnemeier; W Peters; H A Katus
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 29.983

View more
  1 in total

1.  Kaya et al. Is it a typical crosstalk: Need for re-implantation?

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Akbarzadeh
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2015-06-16
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.