Literature DB >> 25823835

Genetic contributions and their optimization.

J A Woolliams1, P Berg, B S Dagnachew, T H E Meuwissen.   

Abstract

Genetic contributions were first formalized in 1958 by James and McBride (Journal of Genetics, 56, 55-62) and have since been shown to provide a unifying framework for theories of gain and inbreeding. As such they have underpinned the development of methods that provide the most effective combination of maximizing gain whilst managing inbreeding and loss of genetic variation. It is shown how this optimum contribution technology can be developed from theory and adapted to provide practical selection protocols for a wide variety of situations including overlapping generations and multistage selection. The natural development of the theory to incorporate genomic selection and genomic control of inbreeding is also shown.
© 2015 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.

Keywords:  breeding program; genetic contribution; genetic gain; genomic selection; inbreeding; optimal contributions

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25823835     DOI: 10.1111/jbg.12148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Breed Genet        ISSN: 0931-2668            Impact factor:   2.380


  37 in total

1.  Moving Beyond Managing Realized Genomic Relationship in Long-Term Genomic Selection.

Authors:  Herman De Beukelaer; Yvonne Badke; Veerle Fack; Geert De Meyer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The Predicted Cross Value for Genetic Introgression of Multiple Alleles.

Authors:  Ye Han; John N Cameron; Lizhi Wang; William D Beavis
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Long-term impact of conventional and optimal contribution conservation methods on genetic diversity and genetic gain in local pig breeds.

Authors:  Qingbo Zhao; Huiming Liu; Qamar Raza Qadri; Qishan Wang; Yuchun Pan; Guosheng Su
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Empirical comparison of genomic and phenotypic selection for resistance to Fusarium ear rot and fumonisin contamination in maize.

Authors:  Eric N Butoto; Jason C Brewer; James B Holland
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 5.574

5.  Assessment of breeding programs sustainability: application of phenotypic and genomic indicators to a North European grain maize program.

Authors:  Antoine Allier; Simon Teyssèdre; Christina Lehermeier; Bruno Claustres; Stéphane Maltese; Stéphane Melkior; Laurence Moreau; Alain Charcosset
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 6.  Reciprocal recurrent genomic selection: an attractive tool to leverage hybrid wheat breeding.

Authors:  Maximilian Rembe; Yusheng Zhao; Yong Jiang; Jochen C Reif
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Changes in Allele Frequencies When Different Genomic Coancestry Matrices Are Used for Maintaining Genetic Diversity.

Authors:  Elisabeth Morales-González; Jesús Fernández; Ricardo Pong-Wong; Miguel Ángel Toro; Beatriz Villanueva
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 4.096

8.  Trends in genetic diversity for all Kennel Club registered pedigree dog breeds.

Authors:  T W Lewis; B M Abhayaratne; S C Blott
Journal:  Canine Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2015-09-21

9.  Whole-genome sequence data uncover loss of genetic diversity due to selection.

Authors:  Sonia E Eynard; Jack J Windig; Sipke J Hiemstra; Mario P L Calus
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  Evaluation of the linkage-disequilibrium method for the estimation of effective population size when generations overlap: an empirical case.

Authors:  María Saura; Albert Tenesa; John A Woolliams; Almudena Fernández; Beatriz Villanueva
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.