Literature DB >> 25823674

An in Vivo 3D Computed Tomographic Analysis of Femoral Tunnel Geometry and Aperture Morphology Between Rigid and Flexible Systems in Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using the Transportal Technique.

Jae Gyoon Kim1, Min Ho Chang2, Hong Chul Lim3, Ji Hoon Bae3, Seung Yup Lee3, Jin Hwan Ahn4, Joon Ho Wang5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare femoral tunnel length, femoral graft-bending angle, posterior wall breakage, and femoral aperture morphologic characteristics between rigid and flexible systems after double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using the transportal (TP) technique.
METHODS: We evaluated 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) results for 54 patients who underwent DB ACL reconstruction using the TP technique with either a flexible system (n = 27) or a rigid system (n = 27). The femoral tunnel length, femoral graft-bending angle, posterior wall breakage, femoral tunnel aperture height to width (H:W) ratio, aperture axis angle, and femoral tunnel position were assessed using OsiriX Imaging Software and Geomagic Qualify 2012 (Geomagic, Cary, NC).
RESULTS: The mean anteromedial (AM) femoral tunnel length of the flexible group was significantly longer than that of the rigid group (P = .009). The mean femoral graft-bending angles in the flexible group were significantly less acute than those in the rigid group (AM, P < .001; posterolateral [PL], P = .003]. Posterior wall breakage was observed in both groups (P = 1.00). The mean H:W ratios in the rigid group were significantly larger (more elliptical) than those of the flexible group (AM, P < .001; PL, P = .006). The mean aperture axis angle of the PL femoral tunnel in the rigid group was more parallel to the femoral shaft axis than that in the flexible group (P < .001). There were no significant differences in femoral tunnel position between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The AM femoral tunnel length and the AM/PL femoral graft-bending angle of the flexible system were significantly longer and less acute than those of the rigid system. However, the aperture morphologic characteristics of the AM/PL femoral tunnel and the aperture axis angle of the PL femoral tunnel in the rigid system were significantly more elliptical and closer to parallel to the femoral shaft axis than those of the flexible system. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.
Copyright © 2015 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25823674     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.01.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  8 in total

1.  In Vivo Analysis of Dynamic Graft Bending Angle in Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Reconstructed Knees During Downward Running and Level Walking: Comparison of Flexible and Rigid Drills for Transportal Technique.

Authors:  Yasutaka Tashiro; Vani Sundaram; Eric Thorhauer; Tom Gale; William Anderst; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu; Scott Tashman
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Comparison of graft bending angle during knee motion after outside-in, trans-portal and trans-tibial anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Yasutaka Tashiro; Sebastián Irarrázaval; Kanji Osaki; Yukihide Iwamoto; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  [Effectiveness analysis of arthroscopic reconstruction of posterior cruciate ligament with embedded "tibial tendon bolt" fixation].

Authors:  Zhengping Sun; Chunyu Zhang; Yongyun Lian; Daifeng Lu
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2022-04-15

4.  Three-Dimensional CT Evaluation of Tunnel Positioning in ACL Reconstruction Using the Single Anteromedial Bundle Biological Augmentation (SAMBBA) Technique.

Authors:  Florent Buscayret; Eduardo Frois Temponi; Adnan Saithna; Mathieu Thaunat; Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-05-22

5.  Influence of Graft Bending Angle on Graft Maturation, the Femoral Tunnel, and Functional Outcomes by 12 Months After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Hong Li; Shaohua Liu; Yaying Sun; Hongyun Li; Shiyi Chen; Jiwu Chen
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-11-26

Review 6.  Comparing the Use of Flexible and Rigid Reaming Systems Through an Anteromedial Portal for Femoral Tunnel Creation During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Thomas E Moran; Anthony J Ignozzi; Brian C Werner
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-10-04

7.  Measurement of the Whole and Midsubstance Femoral Insertion of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament: The Comparison with the Elliptically Calculated Femoral Anterior Cruciate Ligament Footprint Area.

Authors:  Genki Iwama; Takanori Iriuchishima; Takashi Horaguchi; Shin Aizawa
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.251

8.  Flexible Versus Rigid Reaming Systems for Independent Femoral Tunnel Reaming During ACL Reconstruction: Minimum 2-Year Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Thomas E Moran; Anthony J Ignozzi; Eric R Taleghani; Amelia S Bruce; Joseph M Hart; Brian C Werner
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-03-16
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.