Literature DB >> 25823502

Semi-automatic cone beam CT segmentation of in vivo pre-clinical subcutaneous tumours provides an efficient non-invasive alternative for tumour volume measurements.

N P Brodin1, J Tang, K Skalina, T J Quinn, I Basu, C Guha, W A Tomé.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of using cone beam CT (CBCT) scans obtained in radiation studies using the small-animal radiation research platform to perform semi-automatic tumour segmentation of pre-clinical tumour volumes.
METHODS: Volume measurements were evaluated for different anatomical tumour sites, the flank, thigh and dorsum of the hind foot, for a variety of tumour cell lines. The estimated tumour volumes from CBCT and manual calliper measurements using different volume equations were compared with the "gold standard", measured by weighing the tumours following euthanasia and tumour resection. The correlation between tumour volumes estimated with the different methods, compared with the gold standard, was estimated by the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, root-mean-square deviation and the coefficient of determination.
RESULTS: The semi-automatic CBCT volume segmentation performed favourably compared with manual calliper measures for flank tumours ≤2 cm(3) and thigh tumours ≤1 cm(3). For tumours >2 cm(3) or foot tumours, the CBCT method was not able to accurately segment the tumour volumes and manual calliper measures were superior.
CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that tumour volumes of flank and thigh tumours, obtained as a part of radiation studies using image-guided small-animal irradiators, can be estimated more efficiently and accurately using semi-automatic segmentation from CBCT scans. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This is the first study evaluating tumour volume assessment of pre-clinical subcutaneous tumours in different anatomical sites using on-board CBCT imaging. We also compared the accuracy of the CBCT method to manual calliper measures, using various volume calculation equations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25823502      PMCID: PMC4628450          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20140776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  15 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Tumor response assessment is more robust with sequential CT scanning than external caliper measurements.

Authors:  Takayoshi Ishimori; Mitsuaki Tatsumi; Richard L Wahl
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Volume of preclinical xenograft tumors is more accurately assessed by ultrasound imaging than manual caliper measurements.

Authors:  Gregory D Ayers; Eliot T McKinley; Ping Zhao; Jordan M Fritz; Rebecca E Metry; Brenton C Deal; Katrina M Adlerz; Robert J Coffey; H Charles Manning
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.153

4.  Determination of subcutaneous tumor size in athymic (nude) mice.

Authors:  M M Tomayko; C P Reynolds
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.333

5.  Image-guided small animal radiation research platform: calibration of treatment beam alignment.

Authors:  Mohammad Matinfar; Eric Ford; Iulian Iordachita; John Wong; Peter Kazanzides
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  High-resolution, small animal radiation research platform with x-ray tomographic guidance capabilities.

Authors:  John Wong; Elwood Armour; Peter Kazanzides; Iulian Iordachita; Erik Tryggestad; Hua Deng; Mohammad Matinfar; Christopher Kennedy; Zejian Liu; Timothy Chan; Owen Gray; Frank Verhaegen; Todd McNutt; Eric Ford; Theodore L DeWeese
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Comparison of semi-automatic volumetric VX2 hepatic tumor segmentation from cone beam CT and multi-detector CT with histology in rabbit models.

Authors:  Olivier Pellerin; Mingde Lin; Nikhil Bhagat; Roberto Ardon; Benoit Mory; Jean-François Geschwind
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2012-09-02       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Tumor measurement in the nude mouse.

Authors:  D M Euhus; C Hudd; M C LaRegina; F E Johnson
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 3.454

9.  Clinical evaluation of semi-automatic landmark-based lesion tracking software for CT-scans.

Authors:  Peter Dankerl; Alexander Cavallaro; Matthias Dietzel; Alexey Tsymbal; Martin Kramer; Sascha Seifert; Michael Uder; Matthias Hammon
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 3.909

10.  Tumor volume in subcutaneous mouse xenografts measured by microCT is more accurate and reproducible than determined by 18F-FDG-microPET or external caliper.

Authors:  Mette Munk Jensen; Jesper Tranekjaer Jørgensen; Tina Binderup; Andreas Kjaer
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 1.930

View more
  3 in total

1.  Properties of Native High-Density Lipoproteins Inspire Synthesis of Actively Targeted In Vivo siRNA Delivery Vehicles.

Authors:  Kaylin M McMahon; Michael P Plebanek; C Shad Thaxton
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 18.808

2.  Structure-guided development of a high-affinity human Programmed Cell Death-1: Implications for tumor immunotherapy.

Authors:  Eszter Lázár-Molnár; Lisa Scandiuzzi; Indranil Basu; Thomas Quinn; Eliezer Sylvestre; Edith Palmieri; Udupi A Ramagopal; Stanley G Nathenson; Chandan Guha; Steven C Almo
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 8.143

3.  Low Intensity Focused Ultrasound (LOFU)-mediated Acoustic Immune Priming and Ablative Radiation Therapy for in situ Tumor Vaccines.

Authors:  Karin A Skalina; Saurabh Singh; Claudia Gutierrez Chavez; Fernando Macian; Chandan Guha
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.