Literature DB >> 25823484

Bond strength of different restorative materials to light-curable mineral trioxide aggregate.

K Cantekin1.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the bond strength of methacrylate-based (MB) composites, silorane-based (SB) composites, and glass-ionomer cement (GIC) in comparison to TheraCal and to compare those findings with the reference pulp capping material (MTA). STUDY
DESIGN: A total of 90 acrylic blocks were prepared. Each of the blocks were prepared as 15 mm high and 10 mm diameter and the blocks had a 2 mm high and a 5 mm diameter central hole. In 45 of the samples, the holes were fully filled with TheraCal and in the other 45 samples, the holes were fully filled with MTA. The TheraCal and the MTA samples were randomly divided into 3 subgroups of 15 specimens each: Group-1: Methacrylate-based (MB) composite; Group-2: Silorane-based (SB) composite; and Group-3: Glass-ionomer cement (GIC). For the shear bond strength (SBS) test, each block was secured in a universal testing machine. After the SBS test, the fractured surfaces were examined under a stereomicroscope at ×25 magnification.
RESULTS: The analysis of variance that compared the experimental groups revealed the presence of significant differences among the groups (P < 0.001). The highest (19.3 MPa) and the lowest (3.4 MPa) bond strength value were recorded for the MB composite-TheraCal and the GIC-TheraCal, respectively.There were significant differences in bond strength between the TheraCal and the MTA groups for the MB composite subgroup (P < 0.001) and the SB composite subgroup (P < 0.05); however, there was no significant difference in bond strength for the GIC subgroup (P ≯ 0.05). Conlusions: The results from this in vitro study suggest that the new pulp capping material, known as light-curable MTA, showed clinically acceptable and higher shear bond scores compared to MTA when used with the MB composite.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MTA; bond strength; composite

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25823484     DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.39.2.84x57tp110k46183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pediatr Dent        ISSN: 1053-4628            Impact factor:   1.065


  6 in total

Review 1.  Bond Strength of Adhesive Systems to Calcium Silicate-Based Materials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies.

Authors:  Louis Hardan; Davide Mancino; Rim Bourgi; Alejandra Alvarado-Orozco; Laura Emma Rodríguez-Vilchis; Abigailt Flores-Ledesma; Carlos Enrique Cuevas-Suárez; Monika Lukomska-Szymanska; Ammar Eid; Maya-Line Danhache; Maryline Minoux; Youssef Haïkel; Naji Kharouf
Journal:  Gels       Date:  2022-05-18

Review 2.  TheraCal LC: From Biochemical and Bioactive Properties to Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Naji Ziad Arandi; Tarek Rabi
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2018-03-26

3.  Shear bond strength evaluation of an alkasite restorative material to three different liners with and without using adhesive system: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Aarti Mulgaonkar; Ida de Noronha de Ataide; Marina Fernandes; Rajan Lambor
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2021-12-08

4.  Shear bond strength evaluation of resin composite bonded to three different liners: TheraCal LC, Biodentine, and resin-modified glass ionomer cement using universal adhesive: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Velagala L Deepa; Bhargavi Dhamaraju; Indira Priyadharsini Bollu; Tandri S Balaji
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr

5.  Shear bond strength of different restorative materials to mineral trioxide aggregate and Biodentine.

Authors:  Fatih Tulumbaci; Merve Erkmen Almaz; Volkan Arikan; Merve Safa Mutluay
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct

6.  Comparative evaluation of the bond strength of self-adhering and bulk-fill flowable composites to MTA Plus, Dycal, Biodentine, and TheraCal: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Aakrati Raina; Asheesh Sawhny; Saurav Paul; Sridevi Nandamuri
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2020-01-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.