Literature DB >> 25822844

Estimates of the live births, natural losses, and elective terminations with Down syndrome in the United States.

Gert de Graaf1, Frank Buckley, Brian G Skotko.   

Abstract

The present and future live birth prevalence of Down syndrome (DS) is of practical importance for planning services and prioritizing research to support people living with the condition. Live birth prevalence is influenced by changes in prenatal screening technologies and policies. To predict the future impact of these changes, a model for estimating the live births of people with DS is required. In this study, we combine diverse and robust datasets with validated estimation techniques to describe the non-selective and live birth prevalence of DS in the United States from 1900-2010. Additionally, for the period 1974-2010, we estimate the impact of DS-related elective pregnancy terminations (following a prenatal diagnosis of DS) on the live births with DS. The live birth prevalence for DS in the most recent years (2006-2010) was estimated at 12.6 per 10,000 (95% CI 12.4-12.8), with around 5,300 births annually. During this period, an estimated 3,100 DS-related elective pregnancy terminations were performed in the U.S. annually. As of 2007, the estimated rates at which live births with DS were reduced as a consequence of DS-related elective pregnancy terminations were 30% (95% CI: 27.3-31.9) for the U.S. as a whole. Our results and our model provide data on the impact of elective pregnancy terminations on live births with DS and may provide a baseline from which future trends for live births with DS can be estimated.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  down syndrome; elective pregnancy termination; prevalence; trisomy 21

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25822844     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.37001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  53 in total

1.  "This lifetime commitment": Public conceptions of disability and noninvasive prenatal genetic screening.

Authors:  Rosemary J Steinbach; Megan Allyse; Marsha Michie; Emily Y Liu; Mildred K Cho
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 2.802

2.  Trisomy 21 Is a Cause of Permanent Neonatal Diabetes That Is Autoimmune but Not HLA Associated.

Authors:  Matthew B Johnson; Elisa De Franco; Siri Atma W Greeley; Lisa R Letourneau; Kathleen M Gillespie; Matthew N Wakeling; Sian Ellard; Sarah E Flanagan; Kashyap A Patel; Andrew T Hattersley
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 9.461

3.  Caregiver-Reported Quality of Life in Youth with Down Syndrome.

Authors:  Melissa S Xanthopoulos; Rachel Walega; Rui Xiao; Divya Prasad; Mary M Pipan; Babette S Zemel; Robert I Berkowitz; Sheela N Magge; Andrea Kelly
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 4.  Improving Memory and Cognition in Individuals with Down Syndrome.

Authors:  Michael S Rafii
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 5.749

5.  High prevalence of periodic limb movements of sleep in children with Down syndrome.

Authors:  Dennis Rosen; Laura Berbert; Edie Weller
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 4.062

6.  Family Sense-Making After a Down Syndrome Diagnosis.

Authors:  Lauren Clark; Heather E Canary; Kyle McDougle; Rebekah Perkins; Ruth Tadesse; Avery E Holton
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2020-07-03

7.  Concerns About Justification for Fetal Genome Sequencing.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Botkin; Leslie P Francis; Nancy C Rose
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 11.229

Review 8.  Have we done our last amniocentesis? Updates on cell-free DNA for Down syndrome screening.

Authors:  Kathryn J Gray; Louise E Wilkins-Haug
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-03-17

9.  Usefulness of Postnatal Echocardiography in Patients with Down Syndrome with Normal Fetal Echocardiograms.

Authors:  Amy Cooper; Kacy Sisco; Carl H Backes; Marc Dutro; Ruth Seabrook; Stephanie L Santoro; Clifford L Cua
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 1.655

10.  Is preparation a good reason for prenatal genetic testing? Ethical and critical questions.

Authors:  Marsha Michie
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 2.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.