Literature DB >> 25822687

Validation of the 2012 International Consensus Guidelines Using Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Branch Duct and Main Duct Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms of the Pancreas.

Nieun Seo1, Jae Ho Byun, Jin Hee Kim, Hyoung Jung Kim, Seung Soo Lee, Ki Byung Song, Song-Cheol Kim, Duck Jong Han, Seung-Mo Hong, Moon-Gyu Lee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To validate the 2012 guidelines for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas and to compare diagnostic performances of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for differentiating malignant from benign IPMN.
BACKGROUND: As IPMN has variable risks of malignancy and management of this entity is closely related to its malignant potential, it is important to predict risks of IPMN malignancy.
METHODS: This retrospective study included 158 patients with surgically confirmed IPMN of the pancreas who underwent both preoperative CT and MRI. Two radiologists evaluated the "high-risk stigmata" and "worrisome features" of the 2012 guidelines for branch duct (BD)-IPMN and main duct (MD)-IPMN. Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to identify significant predictors of malignancy in IPMN. The diagnostic performance was compared between CT and MRI.
RESULTS: Malignant IPMN was seen in 8 of 60 patients (13.3%) with BD-IPMN and 44 of 98 patients (44.9%) with MD-IPMN. Presence of mural nodule was the most important predictor in BD-IPMN and MD-IPMN (odds ratios, 9.2 and 7.6, respectively, P = 0.01 on CT; and odds ratios, 5.7 and 13.3, respectively, P ≤ 0.04 on MRI), whereas mural nodule size and lymphadenopathy were significant only in MD-IPMN (P < 0.05). The diagnostic performance of CT and MRI for significant findings was not statistically different in both types of IPMN (P > 0.34).
CONCLUSIONS: The presence of mural nodule was the most important predictor of malignancy in both types of IPMN. Mural nodule size and lymphadenopathy were also significant predictors in MD-IPMN. Computed tomography and MRI showed similar diagnostic performances for differentiating malignant from benign IPMN.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 25822687     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  26 in total

1.  Comparison between MRI with MR cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasonography for differentiating malignant from benign mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas.

Authors:  Jiyoung Hwang; Young Kon Kim; Ji Hye Min; Woo Kyung Jeong; Seong Sook Hong; Hyun-Joo Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Development of pancreatic cancer is predictable well in advance using contrast-enhanced CT: a case-cohort study.

Authors:  Wataru Gonoi; Takana Yamakawa Hayashi; Hidemi Okuma; Masaaki Akahane; Yousuke Nakai; Suguru Mizuno; Ryosuke Tateishi; Hiroyuki Isayama; Kazuhiko Koike; Kuni Ohtomo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas: recommendations for Standardized Imaging and Reporting from the Society of Abdominal Radiology IPMN disease focused panel.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Hecht; Gaurav Khatri; Desiree Morgan; Stella Kang; Priya R Bhosale; Isaac R Francis; Namita S Gandhi; David M Hough; Chenchan Huang; Lyndon Luk; Alec Megibow; Justin M Ream; Dushyant Sahani; Vahid Yaghmai; Atif Zaheer; Ravi Kaza
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-11-13

4.  Impact of surgery and surveillance in the management of branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas according to Fukuoka guidelines: the Bologna experience.

Authors:  Riccardo Casadei; Claudio Ricci; Giovanni Taffurelli; Carlo Alberto Pacilio; Marina Migliori; Francesco Minni
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-06-07

Review 5.  Pancreatic Cysts and Guidelines.

Authors:  James J Farrell
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-05-20       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Prognosis of resected intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: using revised 2017 international consensus guidelines.

Authors:  Ji Hye Min; Young Kon Kim; Honsoul Kim; Dong Lk Cha; Soohyun Ahn
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-06-24

Review 7.  [Diagnostics and clinical management of premalignant diseases of the pancreas].

Authors:  S M Buchholz; C Ammer-Herrmenau; V Ellenrieder; A Neesse
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 0.743

8.  Value of apparent diffusion coefficient for predicting malignancy of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; Sheng Xiang Rao; Xue Feng Xu; Dan Song Wang; Da Yong Jin; Meng Su Zeng
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.630

9.  Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms of the Pancreas: Strategic Considerations.

Authors:  Vicente Morales-Oyarvide; Zhi Ven Fong; Carlos Fernández-Del Castillo; Andrew L Warshaw
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2017-12-08

Review 10.  Ductal Dilatation of ≥5 mm in Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm Should Trigger the Consideration for Pancreatectomy: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Resected Cases.

Authors:  Y H Andrew Wu; Atsushi Oba; Laurel Beaty; Kathryn L Colborn; Salvador Rodriguez Franco; Ben Harnke; Cheryl Meguid; Daniel Negrini; Roberto Valente; Steven Ahrendt; Richard D Schulick; Marco Del Chiaro
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.