Monica Lupșor-Platon1, Diana Feier2, Horia Stefănescu3, Attila Tamas2, Emil Botan4, Zeno Sparchez3, Anca Maniu2, Radu Badea2. 1. Department of Medical Imaging, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. monica.lupsor@umfcluj.ro. 2. Department of Medical Imaging, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. 3. Department of Hepatology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. 4. Department of Pathology, Prof. Dr. Octavian Fodor Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology; Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: A novel non-invasive tool based on the evaluation of ultrasound attenuation using transient elastography (TE) has been developed, called controlled attenuation parameter (CAP). We aim to establish the histopathological parameters that significantly influence CAP, the cutoff values and their performance in predicting each steatosis grade on a group of biopsied patients with chronic liver diseases (CLD) from Romania. METHODS: We prospectively analyzed 201 consecutive CLD patients who underwent CAP measurements using TE. Steatosis, liver fibrosis and necroinflammatory activity were staged and graded during the pathological analysis of bioptic specimens. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were applied to identify the variables correlated with CAP values. The diagnostic performance of CAP for steatosis prediction was assessed using an AUC analysis. RESULTS: Among the histopathological factors correlating with CAP, the multivariate analysis found steatosis as the only factor independently influencing CAP values (p < 0.001). Maximal diagnostic accuracy (DA) was obtained for the prediction of ≥ 34-66% (S2) fatty load and of 67-100% (S3) fatty load (82.06%, respectively 81.59%) while, for the prediction of ≥ 11-33% (S1) fatty load, DA reached only 76.11%. The negative predictive value for the exclusion of ≥ S2 and S3 was 93.5% and 98.7%, respectively. AUCs calculated between each two steatosis grades were: 0.772 (S0 vs S1), 0.874 (S0 vs S2), 0.904 (S0 vs S3), 0.659 (S1 vs S2), 0.777 (S1 vs S3), and 0.665 (S2 vs S3). CONCLUSION: Steatosis is the only histopathological factor independently influencing CAP. Maximal DA could be obtained for the prediction of ≥ S2 and S3 (82.06% and 81.59%), while for the prediction of S1, the accuracy reached only 76.11%.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: A novel non-invasive tool based on the evaluation of ultrasound attenuation using transient elastography (TE) has been developed, called controlled attenuation parameter (CAP). We aim to establish the histopathological parameters that significantly influence CAP, the cutoff values and their performance in predicting each steatosis grade on a group of biopsied patients with chronic liver diseases (CLD) from Romania. METHODS: We prospectively analyzed 201 consecutive CLD patients who underwent CAP measurements using TE. Steatosis, liver fibrosis and necroinflammatory activity were staged and graded during the pathological analysis of bioptic specimens. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were applied to identify the variables correlated with CAP values. The diagnostic performance of CAP for steatosis prediction was assessed using an AUC analysis. RESULTS: Among the histopathological factors correlating with CAP, the multivariate analysis found steatosis as the only factor independently influencing CAP values (p < 0.001). Maximal diagnostic accuracy (DA) was obtained for the prediction of ≥ 34-66% (S2) fatty load and of 67-100% (S3) fatty load (82.06%, respectively 81.59%) while, for the prediction of ≥ 11-33% (S1) fatty load, DA reached only 76.11%. The negative predictive value for the exclusion of ≥ S2 and S3 was 93.5% and 98.7%, respectively. AUCs calculated between each two steatosis grades were: 0.772 (S0 vs S1), 0.874 (S0 vs S2), 0.904 (S0 vs S3), 0.659 (S1 vs S2), 0.777 (S1 vs S3), and 0.665 (S2 vs S3). CONCLUSION:Steatosis is the only histopathological factor independently influencing CAP. Maximal DA could be obtained for the prediction of ≥ S2 and S3 (82.06% and 81.59%), while for the prediction of S1, the accuracy reached only 76.11%.
Authors: Marco Silva; Pedro Costa Moreira; Armando Peixoto; Ana Luísa Santos; Susana Lopes; Regina Gonçalves; Pedro Pereira; Hélder Cardoso; Guilherme Macedo Journal: GE Port J Gastroenterol Date: 2018-04-20
Authors: A Sima; I Sporea; R Timar; M Vlad; A Braha; A Popescu; S Nistorescu; R Mare; R Sirli; A Albai; O Albai; L Diaconu; T Sorescu; S Popescu; L Sima Journal: Acta Endocrinol (Buchar) Date: 2018 Jul-Sep Impact factor: 0.877
Authors: Yong Ho Lee; Jae Hyeon Kim; So Ra Kim; Heung Yong Jin; Eun Jung Rhee; Young Min Cho; Byung Wan Lee Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Hye Won Lee; Soo Young Park; Seung Up Kim; Jae Young Jang; Hana Park; Ja Kyung Kim; Chun Kyon Lee; Young Eun Chon; Kwang-Hyub Han Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-06-10 Impact factor: 3.240