Literature DB >> 25821659

Affective and Self-Esteem Instability in the Daily Lives of People with Generalized Social Anxiety Disorder.

Antonina S Farmer1, Todd B Kashdan1.   

Abstract

Research on affect and self-esteem in social anxiety disorder (SAD) has focused on trait or average levels, but we know little about the dynamic patterns of these experiences in the daily lives of people with SAD. We asked 40 adults with SAD and 39 matched healthy controls to provide end-of-day reports on their affect and self-esteem over two weeks. Compared to healthy adults, participants with SAD exhibited greater instability of negative affect and self-esteem, though the self-esteem effect was driven by mean level differences. The SAD group also demonstrated a higher probability of acute changes in negative affect and self-esteem (i.e., from one assessment period to the next), as well as difficulty maintaining positive states and improving negative states (i.e., dysfunctional self-regulation). Our findings provide insights on the phenomenology of SAD, with particular attention to the temporal dependency, magnitude of change, and directional patterns of psychological experiences in everyday life.

Entities:  

Keywords:  emotion; emotional control; individual differences; self-esteem; social anxiety

Year:  2014        PMID: 25821659      PMCID: PMC4373612          DOI: 10.1177/2167702613495200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Psychol Sci        ISSN: 2167-7034


  53 in total

1.  Stability of self-esteem: assessment, correlates, and excuse making.

Authors:  M H Kernis; B D Grannemann; L C Barclay
Journal:  J Pers       Date:  1992-09

2.  Positive emotions: exploring the other hemisphere in behavioral medicine.

Authors:  Margaret A Chesney; Lynae A Darbes; Kate Hoerster; Jonelle M Taylor; Donald B Chambers; David E Anderson
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2005

Review 3.  Change is not always linear: the study of nonlinear and discontinuous patterns of change in psychotherapy.

Authors:  Adele M Hayes; Jean-Philippe Laurenceau; Greg Feldman; Jennifer L Strauss; LeeAnn Cardaciotto
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-01-19

4.  Social anxiety spectrum and diminished positive experiences: theoretical synthesis and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Todd B Kashdan
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-01-10

5.  Validity and reliability of the Experience-Sampling Method.

Authors:  M Csikszentmihalyi; R Larson
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 2.254

6.  A comparison of retrospective self-report versus ecological momentary assessment measures of affective lability in the examination of its relationship with bulimic symptomatology.

Authors:  Michael D Anestis; Edward A Selby; Ross D Crosby; Stephen A Wonderlich; Scott G Engel; Thomas E Joiner
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2010-03-20

7.  There's more to self-esteem than whether it is high or low: the importance of stability of self-esteem.

Authors:  M H Kernis; D P Cornell; C R Sun; A Berry; T Harlow
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1993-12

8.  The reverse of social anxiety is not always the opposite: the reverse-scored items of the social interaction anxiety scale do not belong.

Authors:  Thomas L Rodebaugh; Carol M Woods; Richard G Heimberg
Journal:  Behav Ther       Date:  2007-02-21

9.  Social anxiousness: the construct and its measurement.

Authors:  M R Leary
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  1983-02

10.  Affective instability: measuring a core feature of borderline personality disorder with ecological momentary assessment.

Authors:  Timothy J Trull; Marika B Solhan; Sarah L Tragesser; Seungmin Jahng; Phillip K Wood; Thomas M Piasecki; David Watson
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2008-08
View more
  9 in total

1.  Stress sensitivity and stress generation in social anxiety disorder: a temporal process approach.

Authors:  Antonina S Farmer; Todd B Kashdan
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2015-02

2.  Emotional variability and clarity in depression and social anxiety.

Authors:  Renee J Thompson; Matthew Tyler Boden; Ian H Gotlib
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2015-09-15

3.  Empathy for positive and negative emotions in social anxiety disorder.

Authors:  Amanda S Morrison; Maria A Mateen; Faith A Brozovich; Jamil Zaki; Philippe R Goldin; Richard G Heimberg; James J Gross
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2016-10-19

4.  Comparing Signal-Contingent and Event-Contingent Experience Sampling Ratings of Affect in a Sample of Psychotherapy Outpatients.

Authors:  Sindes Dawood; Michael N Hallquist; Aaron L Pincus; Nilam Ram; Michelle G Newman; Stephen J Wilson; Kenneth N Levy
Journal:  J Psychopathol Behav Assess       Date:  2019-11-27

5.  Symptoms of social anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder: A network perspective.

Authors:  Julia K Langer; Natasha A Tonge; Marilyn Piccirillo; Thomas L Rodebaugh; Renee J Thompson; Ian H Gotlib
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2018-09-22       Impact factor: 4.839

6.  Positive and Negative Affect as Links Between Social Anxiety and Depression: Predicting Concurrent and Prospective Mood Symptoms in Unipolar and Bipolar Mood Disorders.

Authors:  Jonah N Cohen; M Taylor Dryman; Amanda S Morrison; Kirsten E Gilbert; Richard G Heimberg; June Gruber
Journal:  Behav Ther       Date:  2017-07-16

7.  Social comparisons and social anxiety in daily life: An experience-sampling approach.

Authors:  Fallon R Goodman; Kerry C Kelso; Brenton M Wiernik; Todd B Kashdan
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2021-07

8.  Implicit and Explicit Self-Esteem in Current, Remitted, Recovered, and Comorbid Depression and Anxiety Disorders: The NESDA Study.

Authors:  Lonneke A van Tuijl; Klaske A Glashouwer; Claudi L H Bockting; Jorge N Tendeiro; Brenda W J H Penninx; Peter J de Jong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  A Possible Role of Anhedonia as Common Substrate for Depression and Anxiety.

Authors:  Luigi Grillo
Journal:  Depress Res Treat       Date:  2016-03-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.