Literature DB >> 25820917

Regulatory toxicology in the twenty-first century: challenges, perspectives and possible solutions.

Tewes Tralau1, Michael Oelgeschläger, Rainer Gürtler, Gerhard Heinemeyer, Matthias Herzler, Thomas Höfer, Heike Itter, Thomas Kuhl, Nikola Lange, Nicole Lorenz, Christine Müller-Graf, Ulrike Pabel, Ralph Pirow, Vera Ritz, Helmut Schafft, Heiko Schneider, Thomas Schulz, David Schumacher, Sebastian Zellmer, Gaby Fleur-Böl, Matthias Greiner, Monika Lahrssen-Wiederholt, Alfonso Lampen, Andreas Luch, Gilbert Schönfelder, Roland Solecki, Reiner Wittkowski, Andreas Hensel.   

Abstract

The advent of new testing systems and "omics"-technologies has left regulatory toxicology facing one of the biggest challenges for decades. That is the question whether and how these methods can be used for regulatory purposes. The new methods undoubtedly enable regulators to address important open questions of toxicology such as species-specific toxicity, mixture toxicity, low-dose effects, endocrine effects or nanotoxicology, while promising faster and more efficient toxicity testing with the use of less animals. Consequently, the respective assays, methods and testing strategies are subject of several research programs worldwide. On the other hand, the practical application of such tests for regulatory purposes is a matter of ongoing debate. This document summarizes key aspects of this debate in the light of the European "regulatory status quo", while elucidating new perspectives for regulatory toxicity testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25820917     DOI: 10.1007/s00204-015-1510-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Toxicol        ISSN: 0340-5761            Impact factor:   5.153


  13 in total

1.  Transcriptome profiling of HepG2 cells exposed to the flame retardant 9,10-dihydro-9-oxa-10-phosphaphenanthrene 10-oxide (DOPO).

Authors:  Boris V Krivoshiev; Gerrit T S Beemster; Katrien Sprangers; Bart Cuypers; Kris Laukens; Ronny Blust; Steven J Husson
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 3.524

Review 2.  Biology-inspired microphysiological system approaches to solve the prediction dilemma of substance testing.

Authors:  Uwe Marx; Tommy B Andersson; Anthony Bahinski; Mario Beilmann; Sonja Beken; Flemming R Cassee; Murat Cirit; Mardas Daneshian; Susan Fitzpatrick; Olivier Frey; Claudia Gaertner; Christoph Giese; Linda Griffith; Thomas Hartung; Minne B Heringa; Julia Hoeng; Wim H de Jong; Hajime Kojima; Jochen Kuehnl; Marcel Leist; Andreas Luch; Ilka Maschmeyer; Dmitry Sakharov; Adrienne J A M Sips; Thomas Steger-Hartmann; Danilo A Tagle; Alexander Tonevitsky; Tewes Tralau; Sergej Tsyb; Anja van de Stolpe; Rob Vandebriel; Paul Vulto; Jufeng Wang; Joachim Wiest; Marleen Rodenburg; Adrian Roth
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2016-05-15       Impact factor: 6.043

Review 3.  Prospects and challenges of multi-omics data integration in toxicology.

Authors:  Sebastian Canzler; Jana Schor; Wibke Busch; Kristin Schubert; Ulrike E Rolle-Kampczyk; Hervé Seitz; Hennicke Kamp; Martin von Bergen; Roland Buesen; Jörg Hackermüller
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-02-08       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 4.  Applying 'omics technologies in chemicals risk assessment: Report of an ECETOC workshop.

Authors:  Roland Buesen; Brian N Chorley; Beatriz da Silva Lima; George Daston; Lize Deferme; Timothy Ebbels; Timothy W Gant; Amber Goetz; John Greally; Laura Gribaldo; Jörg Hackermüller; Bruno Hubesch; Danyel Jennen; Kamin Johnson; Jun Kanno; Hans-Martin Kauffmann; Madeleine Laffont; Patrick McMullen; Richard Meehan; Mark Pemberton; Stefania Perdichizzi; Aldert H Piersma; Ursula G Sauer; Kerstin Schmidt; Hervé Seitz; Kayo Sumida; Knut E Tollefsen; Weida Tong; Tewes Tralau; Ben van Ravenzwaay; Ralf J M Weber; Andrew Worth; Carole Yauk; Alan Poole
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 3.271

Review 5.  In Silico Models for Hepatotoxicity.

Authors:  Claire Ellison; Mark Hewitt; Katarzyna Przybylak
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

Review 6.  The Exposome and Toxicology: A Win-Win Collaboration.

Authors:  Robert Barouki; Karine Audouze; Christel Becker; Ludek Blaha; Xavier Coumoul; Spyros Karakitsios; Jana Klanova; Gary W Miller; Elliott J Price; Denis Sarigiannis
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 4.109

7.  Systems Toxicology: Real World Applications and Opportunities.

Authors:  Thomas Hartung; Rex E FitzGerald; Paul Jennings; Gary R Mirams; Manuel C Peitsch; Amin Rostami-Hodjegan; Imran Shah; Martin F Wilks; Shana J Sturla
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 8.  Current EU regulatory requirements for the assessment of chemicals and cosmetic products: challenges and opportunities for introducing new approach methodologies.

Authors:  Francesca Pistollato; Federica Madia; Raffaella Corvi; Sharon Munn; Elise Grignard; Alicia Paini; Andrew Worth; Anna Bal-Price; Pilar Prieto; Silvia Casati; Elisabet Berggren; Stephanie K Bopp; Valérie Zuang
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 5.153

9.  Drivers of and Obstacles to the Adoption of Toxicogenomics for Chemical Risk Assessment: Insights from Social Science Perspectives.

Authors:  Guillaume Pain; Gordon Hickey; Matthieu Mondou; Doug Crump; Markus Hecker; Niladri Basu; Steven Maguire
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  Air-Liquid Interface In Vitro Models for Respiratory Toxicology Research: Consensus Workshop and Recommendations.

Authors:  Ghislaine Lacroix; Wolfgang Koch; Detlef Ritter; Arno C Gutleb; Søren Thor Larsen; Thomas Loret; Filippo Zanetti; Samuel Constant; Savvina Chortarea; Barbara Rothen-Rutishauser; Pieter S Hiemstra; Emeric Frejafon; Philippe Hubert; Laura Gribaldo; Peter Kearns; Jean-Marc Aublant; Silvia Diabaté; Carsten Weiss; Antoinette de Groot; Ingeborg Kooter
Journal:  Appl In Vitro Toxicol       Date:  2018-06-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.