Literature DB >> 25818940

Dressings and drains in posterior spine surgery and their effect on wound complications.

R Andrew Glennie1, Nicolas Dea2, John T Street2.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to systematically search, critically appraise and summarize published randomized control trials (RCT) and non-RCT examining the effect of drains and dressings on wound healing rates and complications in posterior spine surgery. The use of post-operative drains and the type of post-operative dressing is at the discretion of the treating surgeon with no available clinical guidelines. Drains will theoretically decrease incidence of post-operative hematoma and therefore, potentially decrease the risk of neurologic compromise when the neural elements have been exposed. Occlusive dressings have more recently been advocated, potentially maintaining a sterile barrier for longer time periods post-operatively. A systematic review of databases from 1969-2013 was undertaken. All papers examining drains in spine surgery and dressings in primary healing of surgical wounds were included. Revman (version 5.2; The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK) was used to test for overall treatment effect, clinical heterogeneity and risk of bias. Of the papers identified, 1348 examined post-operative drains in spine surgery and 979 wound dressings for primary wound healing of all surgical wounds. Seven studies were included for analysis for post-operative drains and 10 studies were analyzed for primary wound healing. The use of a post-operative drain did not influence healing rates and had no effect secondarily on infection (odds ratio [OR] 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76-2.30). We were not able to establish whether surgical drains prevent hematomas causing neurologic compromise. There was a slight advantage to using occlusive dressings versus non-occlusive dressings in wound healing (OR 2.09; 95% CI 1.44-3.02). Incisional vacuum dressings as both an occlusive barrier and superficial drainage system have shown promise for wounds at risk of dehiscence. There is a relatively high risk of bias in the methodology of many of the studies reviewed. We recommend favoring of occlusive dressings based on heterogeneous and potentially biased evidence. Drain use does not affect wound healing based on similar evidence. Incisional vacuum dressings have shown promise in managing potentially vulnerable wounds.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drains; Dressings; Spine; Wounds

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25818940     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 0967-5868            Impact factor:   1.961


  8 in total

Review 1.  Complexities of spine surgery in obese patient populations: a narrative review.

Authors:  Gennadiy A Katsevman; Scott D Daffner; Nicholas J Brandmeir; Sanford E Emery; John C France; Cara L Sedney
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 4.166

2.  Lumbar surgical drains do not increase the risk of infections in patients undergoing spine surgery.

Authors:  Zorica Buser; Ki-Eun Chang; Ronald Kall; Blake Formanek; Anush Arakelyan; Sarah Pak; Betsy Schafer; John C Liu; Jeffrey C Wang; Patrick Hsieh; Thomas C Chen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 2.721

3.  Is a drain tube necessary for minimally invasive lumbar spine fusion surgery?

Authors:  Pei-I Hung; Ming-Chau Chang; Po-Hsin Chou; Hsi-Hsien Lin; Shih-Tien Wang; Chien-Lin Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-25       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Rigenera protocol in the treatment of surgical wound dehiscence.

Authors:  Marco Marcarelli; Letizia Trovato; Elvio Novarese; Michele Riccio; Antonio Graziano
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Post-operative drain use in patients undergoing decompression and fusion: incidence of complications and symptomatic hematoma.

Authors:  Owoicho Adogwa; Aladine A Elsamadicy; Amanda R Sergesketter; Ronnie L Shammas; Sohrab Vatsia; Victoria D Vuong; Syed Khalid; Joseph Cheng; Carlos A Bagley; Isaac O Karikari
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-06

6.  Risk factors for wound complications following spine surgery.

Authors:  Keaton F Piper; Samuel B Tomlinson; Gabrielle Santangelo; Joseph Van Galen; Ian DeAndrea-Lazarus; James Towner; Kristopher T Kimmell; Howard Silberstein; George Edward Vates
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2017-11-01

7.  Open-label randomized controlled trial to compare wound dressings for patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Maria López-Parra; Dolors Gil-Rey; Esmeralda López-González; Eva-Maria González-Rodríguez; Isabel Simó-Sánchez; Francisco Zamora-Carmona; Lidia Roqueta-Andreu; Marta Arizu-Puigvert; Dolors Abril-Sabater; Àngels Moreno-Álvarez; Àngels López-Bonet; Gisela López-Hidalgo; Helena Costa-Ventura; Laura García-Pardo; Mireia Rico-Liberato; Miriam García-Borràs; Maria Teresa Arnal-Leris; Mònica Sianes-Gallén; Roser Vives
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Surgical Site Infection Prophylaxis and Wound Management in Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Alexandra J White; Brian Fiani; Ryan Jarrah; Arbaz A Momin; Jonathan Rasouli
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2021-06-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.