Literature DB >> 25818492

Ropivacaine: a new local anaesthetic agent in maxillofacial surgery.

A Budharapu1, R Sinha2, U K Uppada2, A V S S Subramanya Kumar2.   

Abstract

We have compared the anaesthetic efficacy, duration of action, pain, pulpal anaesthesia, and cardiovascular effects of 0.5% ropivacaine or 2% lignocaine hydrochloride in bilateral symmetrical impacted third molars. In a randomised single-blind trial we studied 78 healthy patients who required bilateral extraction of identical impacted lower third molars. A test dose was given to all patients with subdermal infiltration of 0.5% ropivacaine 0.5 ml. A classic inferior alveolar and long buccal nerve block was created using 0.5% ropivacaine 2 ml on one side and 2% lignocaine hydrochloride 2 ml with adrenaline on the other. The time to onset and duration of action were noted. Pain, numbness of the lip and tip of the tongue, and haemodynamic changes were monitored throughout the procedure. The teeth were extracted two weeks apart. The onset of anaesthesia ranged between 2 and 3 min after the injection and lasted for more than 5h. Ropivacaine alone did not cause appreciable changes in the cardiovascular variables, but lignocaine with adrenaline caused a transient increase in arterial pressure and heart rate 2 min after injection. We conclude the 0.5% ropivacaine alone does not affect the cardiovascular system and has more beneficial effects than 2% lignocaine hydrochloride with adrenaline. These findings may be useful for oral and maxillofacial surgeons who are looking for a local anaesthetic with minimal cardiovascular risk and without a vasoconstrictor to provide regional anaesthesia for long procedures.
Copyright © 2015 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adrenaline; Lignocaine HCl; Ropivacaine; Vasoconstrictor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25818492     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.02.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0266-4356            Impact factor:   1.651


  13 in total

1.  Effect of epinephrine on the distribution of ropivacaine and lidocaine using radioactive isotopes in rat maxilla and pulp.

Authors:  Kyohei Fujita; Katsuhisa Sunada
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  A meta-analysis on the efficacy of the ropivacaine infiltration in comparison with other dental anesthetics.

Authors:  Norma Patricia Figueroa-Fernández; Ycenna Ailed Hernández-Miramontes; Ángel Josabad Alonso-Castro; Mario Alberto Isiordia-Espinoza
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  A Comparative Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Lignocaine and Dexmedetomidine with Lignocaine and Adrenaline in Third Molar Surgery.

Authors:  Thomson Mariadasan Dcruz; Charmiben Patel; Abhijeet Masih; Izaz Shaik
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2020-11-09

4.  Local anaesthesia for surgical extraction of mandibular third molars: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fan Yang; Yuxuan Gao; Lan Zhang; Bo Zheng; Liu Wang; Huan Sun; Dingming Huang
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Efficacy and safety of 1% ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia after lower third molar surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded clinical study.

Authors:  Božidar Brković; Miroslav Andrić; Dejan Ćalasan; Marija Milić; Jelena Stepić; Milan Vučetić; Denis Brajković; Ljubomir Todorović
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Is 0.75% ropivacaine more efficacious than 2% lignocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine for IANB in surgical extraction of impacted lower third molar?

Authors:  K Varun Reddy; Anendd Jadhav; Nitin Bhola; Apoorva Mishra; Prachet Dakshinkar
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019-05-14

7.  Effectiveness of anesthetic solutions for pain control in lower third molar extraction surgeries: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials with network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marco Tulio Rossi; Murilo Navarro de Oliveira; Maria Tereza Campos Vidigal; Walbert de Andrade Vieira; Cristiano Elias Figueiredo; Cauane Blumenberg; Vinicius Lima de Almeida; Luiz Renato Paranhos; Luciana Butini Oliveira; Walter Luiz Siqueira; Rui Barbosa de Brito Júnior
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-11-08       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Comparison of anaesthetic efficacy of ropivacaine (0.75% & 0.5%) with 2% lignocaine with adrenaline (1:200000) in surgical extraction of bilateral mandibular 3rd molars using IANB:a prospective, randomized, single blind study.

Authors:  Kamil N Rajpari; Neelam N Andrade; Trupti Nikalje
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2021-02-09

9.  Comparative Analysis of the Anesthetic Efficacy of 0.5% Ropivacaine Versus 2% Lignocaine Hydrochloride with Adrenaline (1:80,000) for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars.

Authors:  Ram Goyal; Parveen Sharma; Rishi Bali
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2020-07-31

10.  The Effectiveness of Ropivacaine and Mepivacaine in the Postoperative Pain after Third Lower Molar Surgery.

Authors:  Vito Crincoli; Gianfranco Favia; Luisa LImongelli; Angela Tempesta; Nicola Brienza
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.