Literature DB >> 25817743

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-associated AmpC Escherichia coli outbreak.

Kristen A Wendorf1, Meagan Kay2, Christopher Baliga3, Scott J Weissman4, Michael Gluck5, Punam Verma6, Marisa D'Angeli7, Jennifer Swoveland7, Mi-Gyeong Kang7, Kaye Eckmann7, Andrew S Ross5, Jeffrey Duchin2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We identified an outbreak of AmpC-producing Escherichia coli infections resistant to third-generation cephalosporins and carbapenems (CR) among 7 patients who had undergone endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography at hospital A during November 2012-August 2013. Gene sequencing revealed a shared novel mutation in a bla CMY gene and a distinctive fumC/ fimH typing profile.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent and epidemiologic characteristics of the outbreak, identify potential sources of transmission, design and implement infection control measures, and determine the association between the CR E. coli and AmpC E. coli circulating at hospital A.
METHODS: We reviewed laboratory, medical, and endoscopy reports, and endoscope reprocessing procedures. We obtained cultures from endoscopes after reprocessing as well as environmental samples and conducted pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and gene sequencing on phenotypic AmpC isolates from patients and endoscopes. Cases were those infected with phenotypic AmpC isolates (both carbapenem-susceptible and CR) and identical bla CMY-2, fumC, and fimH alleles or related pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns.
RESULTS: Thirty-five of 49 AmpC E. coli tested met the case definition, including all CR isolates. All cases had complicated biliary disease and had undergone at least 1 endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography at hospital A. Mortality at 30 days was 16% for all patients and 56% for CR patients. Two of 8 reprocessed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography scopes harbored AmpC that matched case isolates by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Environmental cultures were negative. No breaches in infection control were identified. Endoscopic reprocessing exceeded manufacturer's recommended cleaning guidelines.
CONCLUSION: Recommended reprocessing guidelines are not sufficient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25817743     DOI: 10.1017/ice.2015.66

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol        ISSN: 0899-823X            Impact factor:   3.254


  37 in total

1.  Comparison of Two Culture Methods for Use in Assessing Microbial Contamination of Duodenoscopes.

Authors:  Michaela A Gazdik; Jana Coombs; John P Burke; Bert K Lopansri
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Duodenoscope-Associated Infections: Update on an Emerging Problem.

Authors:  M Rubayat Rahman; Abhilash Perisetti; Roxana Coman; Pardeep Bansal; Rajiv Chhabra; Hemant Goyal
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  Superbugs on Duodenoscopes: the Challenge of Cleaning and Disinfection of Reusable Devices.

Authors:  Romney M Humphries; Gerald McDonnell
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Is This the Carbapenemase Test We've Been Waiting for? A Multicenter Evaluation of the Modified Carbapenem Inactivation Method.

Authors:  Susan M Butler-Wu; April N Abbott
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Scoping the scope: endoscopic evaluation of endoscope working channels with a new high-resolution inspection endoscope (with video).

Authors:  Monique T Barakat; Mohit Girotra; Robert J Huang; Subhas Banerjee
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 6.  Duodenoscope-Associated Bacterial Infections: A Review and Update.

Authors:  Jennifer T Higa; Michael Gluck; Andrew S Ross
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06

Review 7.  Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in special populations: Solid organ transplant recipients, stem cell transplant recipients, and patients with hematologic malignancies.

Authors:  Stephanie M Pouch; Michael J Satlin
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 5.882

8.  Eliminating Duodenoscope-Associated Transmission of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE): In Search of an Optimal Strategy.

Authors:  Divyanshoo R Kohli; Thomas E Grys; Rahul Pannala
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 9.  Duodenoscope-associated infections: a review.

Authors:  Gheorghe G Balan; Catalin Victor Sfarti; Stefan Andrei Chiriac; Carol Stanciu; Anca Trifan
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  Double high-level disinfection versus liquid chemical sterilization for reprocessing of duodenoscopes used for ERCP: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Mark A Gromski; Marnie S Sieber; Stuart Sherman; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 9.427

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.