Literature DB >> 19428296

Comparison of corticomotor excitability during visuomotor dynamic and static tasks.

Alan J Pearce1, Dawson J Kidgell.   

Abstract

The human central nervous system (CNS) has the ability to modulate its activity during the performance of different movements. Recent evidence, however, suggests that the CNS can also modulate its activity in the same movement but with increased precision during a visuomotor static task. This study aimed to extend on these findings by using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to measure the CNS during the performance of two visuomotor dynamic tasks. Twelve volunteers participated in this study, performing two separate motor tasks. Study I ("Position Tracking") involved participants to perform a visuomotor tracking task using a dial potentiometer and matching their response icon to the computer generated tracking icon whilst holding a pincer grip. Study II ("Force Tracking") involved participants to perform a similar visuomotor tracking task by applying or releasing pressure against a fixed force transducer. Tasks were conducted at two speeds ("slow" being one tracking cycle in 10s; and "fast" being two tracking cycles in 10s) and compared to a visuomotor static task at a similar muscle contraction level. Results showed corticospinal changes with significant increases (p=0.002) in excitability demonstrated during Study I (42.3+/-16.8%) and Study II (56.3+/-34.2%) slow speed tasks. Moreover, significant reduction in corticospinal inhibition was also observed during both tracking tasks at slow (59.3+/-13.7%; p=0.001) and fast speeds (31.9+/-12.3%; p=0.001). The findings may provide information on the underlying physiology during the early stages of motor skill acquisition. Copyright (c) 2009 Sports Medicine Australia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19428296     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2008.12.632

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sci Med Sport        ISSN: 1878-1861            Impact factor:   4.319


  6 in total

1.  Excitability of the infraspinatus, but not the middle deltoid, is affected by shoulder elevation angle.

Authors:  Yin-Liang Lin; Anita Christie; Andrew Karduna
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The corticospinal responses of metronome-paced, but not self-paced strength training are similar to motor skill training.

Authors:  Michael Leung; Timo Rantalainen; Wei-Peng Teo; Dawson Kidgell
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Reduction in corticospinal inhibition in the trained and untrained limb following unilateral leg strength training.

Authors:  Christopher Latella; Dawson J Kidgell; Alan J Pearce
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  The Task at Hand: Fatigue-Associated Changes in Cortical Excitability during Writing.

Authors:  Kezia T M Cinelli; Lara A Green; Jayne M Kalmar
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2019-12-02

Review 5.  Anatomo-Functional Origins of the Cortical Silent Period: Spotlight on the Basal Ganglia.

Authors:  David Zeugin; Silvio Ionta
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-05-27

6.  Short-interval intracortical inhibition is not affected by varying visual feedback in an isometric task in biceps brachii muscle.

Authors:  Timo Rantalainen; Ashleigh Weier; Michael Leung; Chris Brandner; Michael Spittle; Dawson Kidgell
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 3.169

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.