PURPOSE: To evaluate gemcitabine-cisplatin (GC) neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy (NAC) for pathologic response (pR) and cancer-specific outcomes following radical cystectomy (RC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer and identify clinical parameters associated with pR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 150 consecutive cases of muscle-invasive bladder cancer that received GC NAC followed by open RC (2000-2013). A cohort of 121 patients treated by RC alone was used for comparison. Pathologic response and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were compared. We created the Johns Hopkins Hospital Dose Index to characterize chemotherapeutic dosing regimens and accurately assess sufficient neoadjuvant dosing regarding patient tolerance. RESULTS: No significant difference was noted in 5-year CSS between GC NAC (58%) and non-NAC cohorts (61%). The median follow-up was 19.6 months (GC NAC) and 106.5 months (non-NAC). Patients with residual non-muscle-invasive disease after GC NAC exhibit similar 5-year CSS relative to patients with no residual carcinoma (P = 0.99). NAC pR (≤ pT1) demonstrated improved 5-year CSS rates (90.6% vs. 27.1%, P < 0.01) and decreased nodal positivity rates (0% vs. 41.3%, P<0.01) when compared with nonresponders (≥ pT2). Clinicopathologic outcomes were inferior in NAC pathologic nonresponders when compared with the entire RC-only-treated cohort. A lower pathologic nonresponder rate was seen in patients tolerating sufficient dosing of NAC as stratified by the Johns Hopkins Hospital Dose Index (P = 0.049), congruent with the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. A multivariate classification tree model demonstrated 60 years of age or younger and clinical stage cT2 as significant of NAC response (P< 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Pathologic nonresponders fare worse than patients proceeding directly to RC alone do. Multiple predictive models incorporating clinical, histopathologic, and molecular features are currently being developed to identify patients who are most likely to benefit from GC NAC.
PURPOSE: To evaluate gemcitabine-cisplatin (GC) neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy (NAC) for pathologic response (pR) and cancer-specific outcomes following radical cystectomy (RC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer and identify clinical parameters associated with pR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 150 consecutive cases of muscle-invasive bladder cancer that received GCNAC followed by open RC (2000-2013). A cohort of 121 patients treated by RC alone was used for comparison. Pathologic response and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were compared. We created the Johns Hopkins Hospital Dose Index to characterize chemotherapeutic dosing regimens and accurately assess sufficient neoadjuvant dosing regarding patient tolerance. RESULTS: No significant difference was noted in 5-year CSS between GCNAC (58%) and non-NAC cohorts (61%). The median follow-up was 19.6 months (GCNAC) and 106.5 months (non-NAC). Patients with residual non-muscle-invasive disease after GCNAC exhibit similar 5-year CSS relative to patients with no residual carcinoma (P = 0.99). NAC pR (≤ pT1) demonstrated improved 5-year CSS rates (90.6% vs. 27.1%, P < 0.01) and decreased nodal positivity rates (0% vs. 41.3%, P<0.01) when compared with nonresponders (≥ pT2). Clinicopathologic outcomes were inferior in NAC pathologic nonresponders when compared with the entire RC-only-treated cohort. A lower pathologic nonresponder rate was seen in patients tolerating sufficient dosing of NAC as stratified by the Johns Hopkins Hospital Dose Index (P = 0.049), congruent with the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. A multivariate classification tree model demonstrated 60 years of age or younger and clinical stage cT2 as significant of NAC response (P< 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Pathologic nonresponders fare worse than patients proceeding directly to RC alone do. Multiple predictive models incorporating clinical, histopathologic, and molecular features are currently being developed to identify patients who are most likely to benefit from GCNAC.
Authors: Adam C Reese; Mark W Ball; Nilay Gandhi; Michael A Gorin; George J Netto; Trinity J Bivalacqua; Mark P Schoenberg Journal: Urology Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Mun Sem Liew; Arun Azad; Ali Tafreshi; Renu Eapen; Damien Bolton; Ian D Davis; Shomik Sengupta Journal: BJU Int Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Homayoun Zargar; Patrick N Espiritu; Adrian S Fairey; Laura S Mertens; Colin P Dinney; Maria C Mir; Laura-Maria Krabbe; Michael S Cookson; Niels-Erik Jacobsen; Nilay M Gandhi; Joshua Griffin; Jeffrey S Montgomery; Nikhil Vasdev; Evan Y Yu; David Youssef; Evanguelos Xylinas; Nicholas J Campain; Wassim Kassouf; Marc A Dall'Era; Jo-An Seah; Cesar E Ercole; Simon Horenblas; Srikala S Sridhar; John S McGrath; Jonathan Aning; Shahrokh F Shariat; Jonathan L Wright; Andrew C Thorpe; Todd M Morgan; Jeff M Holzbeierlein; Trinity J Bivalacqua; Scott North; Daniel A Barocas; Yair Lotan; Jorge A Garcia; Andrew J Stephenson; Jay B Shah; Bas W van Rhijn; Siamak Daneshmand; Philippe E Spiess; Peter C Black Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2014-09-23 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Andrea B Apolo; Joseph W Kim; Bernard H Bochner; Seth M Steinberg; Dean F Bajorin; Wm Kevin Kelly; Piyush K Agarwal; Theresa M Koppie; Matthew G Kaag; David I Quinn; Nicholas J Vogelzang; Srikala S Sridhar Journal: Urol Oncol Date: 2014-05-16 Impact factor: 3.498
Authors: C N Sternberg; P de Mulder; J H Schornagel; C Theodore; S D Fossa; A T van Oosterom; J A Witjes; M Spina; C J van Groeningen; B Duclos; J T Roberts; C de Balincourt; L Collette Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2005-12-05 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Phillip J Gray; Stacey A Fedewa; William U Shipley; Jason A Efstathiou; Chun Chieh Lin; Anthony L Zietman; Katherine S Virgo Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2012-11-19 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Elizabeth R Plimack; Jean H Hoffman-Censits; Rosalia Viterbo; Edouard J Trabulsi; Eric A Ross; Richard E Greenberg; David Y T Chen; Costas D Lallas; Yu-Ning Wong; Jianqing Lin; Alexander Kutikov; Efrat Dotan; Timothy A Brennan; Norma Palma; Essel Dulaimi; Reza Mehrazin; Stephen A Boorjian; William Kevin Kelly; Robert G Uzzo; Gary R Hudes Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-05-12 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Luca Boeri; Matteo Soligo; Igor Frank; Stephen A Boorjian; R Houston Thompson; Matthew Tollefson; Robert Tarrel; Fernando J Quevedo; John C Cheville; R Jeffrey Karnes Journal: World J Urol Date: 2019-02-25 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Takashi Kawahara; Hiroki Ide; Eiji Kashiwagi; John D Patterson; Satoshi Inoue; Hasanain Khaleel Shareef; Ali Kadhim Aljarah; Yichun Zheng; Alexander S Baras; Hiroshi Miyamoto Journal: Am J Cancer Res Date: 2015-09-15 Impact factor: 6.166
Authors: Meera R Chappidi; Max Kates; Aaron Brant; Alexander S Baras; George J Netto; Phillip M Pierorazio; Noah M Hahn; Trinity J Bivalacqua Journal: Urology Date: 2017-01-16 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Georgios Kallifatidis; Diandra K Smith; Daley S Morera; Jie Gao; Martin J Hennig; James J Hoy; Richard F Pearce; Isha R Dabke; Jiemin Li; Axel S Merseburger; Markus A Kuczyk; Vinata B Lokeshwar; Bal L Lokeshwar Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2019-02-20 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Eugene J Pietzak; Emily C Zabor; Aditya Bagrodia; Joshua Armenia; Wenhuo Hu; Ahmet Zehir; Samuel Funt; Francois Audenet; David Barron; Noelia Maamouri; Qiang Li; Min Yuen Teo; Maria E Arcila; Michael F Berger; Nikolaus Schultz; Guido Dalbagni; Harry W Herr; Dean F Bajorin; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Hikmat Al-Ahmadie; Bernard H Bochner; David B Solit; Gopa Iyer Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2018-10-02 Impact factor: 24.267
Authors: Alexander S Baras; Nilay Gandhi; Enrico Munari; Sheila Faraj; Luciana Shultz; Luigi Marchionni; Mark Schoenberg; Noah Hahn; Mohammad Obaidul Hoque; Mohammad Hoque; David Berman; Trinity J Bivalacqua; George Netto Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-07-31 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Alexander S Baras; Charles Drake; Jen-Jane Liu; Nilay Gandhi; Max Kates; Mohamed O Hoque; Alan Meeker; Noah Hahn; Janis M Taube; Mark P Schoenberg; George Netto; Trinity J Bivalacqua Journal: Oncoimmunology Date: 2016-02-18 Impact factor: 8.110