Literature DB >> 25813809

Investigation of the requirements of 'good teaching' to improve teaching professionalism in medical education.

Eun-Jung Im1, Yoo-Chul Lee2, Bong-Hyun Chang1, Sung-Kwang Chung3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to survey the awareness of faculty (F) and students (S) on 'good teaching' and to analyze an example of good lesson, finally to identify the requirements of 'good teaching' in medical education.
METHODS: Quantitative and qualitative methods were applied simultaneously. First, survey using a questionnaire was analyzed by frequency analysis and verified using chi-square-test, Mann-Whitney test. Second, the case of good teaching and qualitative data were analyzed by 'priori codes coding' and 'open coding'.
RESULTS: The results of survey are as follows: Both faculty and students regarded lessons that taught important content easy to understand (F: 50%; S: 69.1%); Lessons that allow students make sure important information (F: 48.6%; S: 51.4%); Lessons that prepare and plan considering the student's level and interest (F: m=3.78; S: m=3.76) were good lessons. Faculty wanted lessons that improve student's academic achievement (35.7%), while students choose lessons that deliver curriculum effectively using appropriate teaching method (47.1%). According to the results of case analysis, it turned out that characteristics of good teaching were as follows: Thorough plan and preparation of content, various teaching methods and materials, encouragement of intellectual inquiry and curiosity, active interaction between faculty and students, clear feedback and reasonable evaluation.
CONCLUSION: Requirements of good teaching are open to faculty at school of medicine and are to be utilized as guidelines to monitor and improve their instruction.

Keywords:  Medical education; Professional competence; Teaching

Year:  2010        PMID: 25813809     DOI: 10.3946/kjme.2010.22.2.101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Med Educ        ISSN: 2005-727X


  6 in total

1.  Individual class evaluation and effective teaching characteristics in integrated curricula.

Authors:  Jung Eun Hwang; Na Jin Kim; Meiying Song; Yinji Cui; Eun Ju Kim; In Ae Park; Hye In Lee; Hye Jin Gong; Su Young Kim
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 2.463

2.  A study on the characteristics of excellent lecturers in medical school.

Authors:  Haebum Lee; Eunbae B Yang
Journal:  Korean J Med Educ       Date:  2013-03-31

3.  Developing and testing an evaluation tool to measure clinical teaching.

Authors:  Eun-Jung Im
Journal:  Korean J Med Educ       Date:  2011-03-31

4.  What kind of feedback do medical students want?

Authors:  Jong-Yeup Kim; Baeg Ju Na; Jungmin Yun; Jaegu Kang; Seungyeon Han; Wonmin Hwang; Yera Hur
Journal:  Korean J Med Educ       Date:  2014-09-01

5.  [Peer review analysis of lectures using video recordings in an integrated curriculum].

Authors:  Dong-Mi Yoo; HyunBae Yoon; Seunghee Lee
Journal:  Korean J Med Educ       Date:  2015-03-31

6.  [Needs assessment for developing teaching competencies of medical educators].

Authors:  Jihyun Si
Journal:  Korean J Med Educ       Date:  2015-08-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.