| Literature DB >> 25811926 |
Klébea Carvalho1, Lupis Ribeiro2, Jorge Moraes3,4, José Roberto da Silva5,6, Evenilton P Costa7, Jackson Souza-Menezes8, Carlos Logullo9,10, Rodrigo Nunes da Fonseca11,12, Eldo Campos13,14.
Abstract
Polyphosphates have been found in all cell types examined to date and play diverse roles depending on the cell type. In eukaryotic organisms, polyphosphates have been mainly investigated in mammalian cells with few studies on insects. Some studies have demonstrated that a pyrophosphatase regulates polyphosphate metabolism, and most of them were performed on trypanosomatids. Here, we investigated the effects of sPPase gene knocked down in oogenesis and polyphosphate metabolism in the red flour beetle (Tribolium castaneum). A single sPPase gene was identified in insect genome and is maternally provided at the mRNA level and not restricted to any embryonic or extraembryonic region during embryogenesis. After injection of Tc-sPPase dsRNA, female survival was reduced to 15% of the control (dsNeo RNA), and egg laying was completely impaired. The morphological analysis by nuclear DAPI staining of the ovarioles in Tc-sPPase dsRNA-injected females showed that the ovariole number is diminished, degenerated oocytes can be observed, and germarium is reduced. The polyphosphate level was increased in cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions in Tc-sPPase RNAi; Concomitantly, the exopolyphosphatase activity decreased in both fractions. Altogether, these data suggest a role for sPPase in the regulation on polyphosphate metabolism in insects and provide evidence that Tc-sPPase is essential to oogenesis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25811926 PMCID: PMC4424980 DOI: 10.3390/ijms16046631
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1A single sPPAse is present in insect genomes. Gene bank accession numbers are as follows: XP 558852.4 Anopheles gambiae (Agam-sPPase), ABF18311.1 Aedes aegypti (Aaeg-sPPase), EEZ98942.1 TC004566 Tribolium castaneum (Tcas-sPPase), AAC97112.1 NURF-38 Drosophila melanogaster (Dmel-sPPase-NURF-38), XP 001976623.1 Drosophila erecta (Derc-sPPase), XP 008183751.1 Acyrthosiphon pisum (Apis-sPPase), XP 001604166.1 Nasonia vitripennis (Nvit-sPPase), XP 003249382.1 Apis mellifera (Amel-sPPase), P19117 Schizosaccharomyces pombe (Spom-sPPase), Q6MVH7 Neurospora crassa (Ncra-sPPase), O13505 Komagataella pastoris (Kpas-sPPase), P13998 Kluyveromyces lactis (Klac-sPPase), P00817 Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Scer-sPPase), Q9C0T9 Zygosaccharomyces bailii (Zbai-sPPase), Q9H2U2 Homo sapiens (Hsap-sPPase), Q91VM9 Mus musculus (Mmus-sPPase), Q15181 Homo sapiens (Hsap2-sPPase), Q9D819 Mus musculus (Mmus2-sPPase), Q6CNP0 Kluyveromyces lactis (Klac2-sPPase), Q6BLR8 Debaryomyces hansenii (Dhan-sPPase), Q9LXC9 Arabidopsis thaliana (Atha-sPPase), Q93Y52 Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (Chei-sPPase), Q7Z031 Leishmania amazonensis (Lama-sPPase), O48556 Zea mays (Zmay-sPPase), O23979 Hordeum vulgare (Hvul-sPPase), Q9SWI0 Populus tremula (Ptre-sPPase), Q0DYB1 Oryza sativa (Osat-sPPase), O49949 Solanum tuberosum (Stub-sPPase), P38576 Thermus thermophiles (Tter-sPPase), O34955 Legionella pneumophila (Lpne-sPPase), P51064 Bartonella bacilliformis (Bbac-sPPase), O67501 Aquifex aeolicus (Aaeo-sPPase), O05545 Gluconobacter oxydans (Goxy-sPPase), Q9ZCW5 Rickettsia prowazekii (Rpro-sPPase). Substitution model used LG + G + I with 100 bootstraps.
Figure 2Tc-pyrophosphatase (Tc-sPPase) is maternally provided and expressed during embryogenesis. (A) Freshly laid Tribolium castaneum egg showing Tc-sPPase expression; (B) Tc-sPPase expression during germ band elongation; (C) Tc-zen expression at the serosa during blastoderm differentiation; and (D) In situ hybridization using a Tc-sPPase probe sense control. Scale bar = 200 µm.
Figure 3(A) Comparison of Tc-sPPase in control (dsNeo RNA) and sPPase dsRNA injected adults. Normalized levels to Tc-Rps3 expression as previously described [26]; (B) Adult survival in control and sPPase dsRNA injected beetles (%); and (C) Egg laying of control and sPPase dsRNA–injected beetles (%). Asterisk indicates that the difference between the two groups is statistically significant (p < 0.05).
Figure 4(A) Control dsNeoRNA ovarioles; (B) Nuclear DAPI (4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) staining of the ovary as in (A); (C) sPPase dsRNA–injected ovarioles; (D) Nuclear DAPI staining of the ovary in (C); (E) sPPase dsRNA–injected ovarioles; and (F) Nuclear DAPI staining of the ovary in (E).
Figure 5(A) Cytoplasm poly P fluorescence (DAPI) of wild-type, control (dsNeo RNA), and sPPase RNAi beetles; (B) Nuclear poly P fluorescence (DAPI) of wild-type, control (dsNeo RNA), and sPPase RNAi beetles; (C) Cytoplasmic PPX activity in wild-type, control (dsNeo RNA), and PPX activity in the presence and absence of heparin; and (D) Nuclear PPX activity in wild-type, control (dsNeo RNA), and PPX activity in the presence and absence of heparin. Data are the mean ± S.E. (standard error) of three independent experiments, in triplicate. * p < 0.05.