J Nicholas Lukens1, Alexander Lin, Stephen M Hahn. 1. aDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania bDivision of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Proton therapy for head and neck cancer is an area of active research as technological advances are increasingly integrated into clinical practice, and also the subject of heightened scrutiny due to the significant associated cost. This article will highlight recent research into proton dosimetry, studies evaluating its clinical benefit relative to other advanced radiotherapy modalities, and key safety and cost considerations. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent dosimetric analyses have quantified the potential for the most sophisticated form of proton therapy, intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT), to reduce dose to key anatomic structures in the head and neck, and highlight the potential for dose uncertainty with IMPT if not implemented in a careful manner. Clinical contributions demonstrate the potential for protons to yield excellent local control and lower than expected morbidity for tumors adjacent to critical neurological structures. There are promising data in the reirradiation setting, and emerging data for IMPT in oropharyngeal cancer. SUMMARY: Proton therapy for head and neck cancer holds significant potential, and promising single-institution experiences should be validated, wherever feasible, in prospective randomized clinical trials. In light of the significant associated cost, additional evidence is needed to guide the appropriate allocation of patients to IMPT versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Proton therapy for head and neck cancer is an area of active research as technological advances are increasingly integrated into clinical practice, and also the subject of heightened scrutiny due to the significant associated cost. This article will highlight recent research into proton dosimetry, studies evaluating its clinical benefit relative to other advanced radiotherapy modalities, and key safety and cost considerations. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent dosimetric analyses have quantified the potential for the most sophisticated form of proton therapy, intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT), to reduce dose to key anatomic structures in the head and neck, and highlight the potential for dose uncertainty with IMPT if not implemented in a careful manner. Clinical contributions demonstrate the potential for protons to yield excellent local control and lower than expected morbidity for tumors adjacent to critical neurological structures. There are promising data in the reirradiation setting, and emerging data for IMPT in oropharyngeal cancer. SUMMARY: Proton therapy for head and neck cancer holds significant potential, and promising single-institution experiences should be validated, wherever feasible, in prospective randomized clinical trials. In light of the significant associated cost, additional evidence is needed to guide the appropriate allocation of patients to IMPT versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
Authors: Paul B Romesser; Oren Cahlon; Eli Scher; Ying Zhou; Sean L Berry; Alisa Rybkin; Kevin M Sine; Shikui Tang; Eric J Sherman; Richard Wong; Nancy Y Lee Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2016-02-08 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Adepitan A Owosho; SaeHee K Yom; Zhiqiang Han; Kevin Sine; Nancy Y Lee; Joseph M Huryn; Cherry L Estilo Journal: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Date: 2016-07-19
Authors: Eileen Ruth S Torres; Reed Hall; Gerd Bobe; Jaewoo Choi; Soren Impey; Carl Pelz; Jonathan R Lindner; Jan F Stevens; Jacob Raber Journal: Front Mol Biosci Date: 2019-09-10
Authors: Chumin Zhou; Maria Rita Fabbrizi; Jonathan R Hughes; Gabrielle J Grundy; Jason L Parsons Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-08-16 Impact factor: 5.738
Authors: Kimberly J Jasmer; Kristy E Gilman; Kevin Muñoz Forti; Gary A Weisman; Kirsten H Limesand Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2020-12-18 Impact factor: 4.964