Suzanne Murray1, Kevin L Obholz2, Andrew D Bowser2, Jim Mortimer2, Patrice Lazure1, Eric Peterson3, James O Armitage4, B Douglas Smith5. 1. Axdev Group Inc, Brossard, Quebec, Canada. 2. Clinical Care Options, Reston, Virginia. 3. Annenberg Center for Health Sciences at Eisenhower, Rancho Mirage, California ; American Academy of Physician Assistants, Alexandria, Virginia. 4. The Nebraska Medical Center in Omaha, Nebraska. 5. Kimmel Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Treating patients with hematologic malignancies can be challenging for physicians because of the rapidly evolving standards of care and relatively low incidence of these diseases. OBJECTIVE: To identify clinical challenges among hematologists and medical oncologists regarding the provision of care to patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), or B-cell lymphomas. Methods Hematologists and medical oncologists in active practice in the United States and who have a case load of ≥ 1 patient a year with CML, ALL, or B-cell lymphoma were recruited. The initial qualitative phase consisted of an online case-based survey followed by an interview exploring the contextual and behavioral factors that influence treatment decisions (n = 27). The analysis of qualitative data then informed a quantitative phase, in which 121 participants completed an online survey composed of case vignettes, multiple choice, and semantic differential rating scale questions. The respondents' answers were compared with recommendations from treatment guidelines and faculty experts. RESULTS: A higher frequency of bone marrow biopsies was reported compared with expert faculty recommendations by 74% of oncologists. Many respondents failed to recognize the clinical relevance of BCR-ABL mutations other than T315I. Respondents reported perceiving difficulties in individualizing treatment and interpreting response to treatment in patients with ALL and B-cell lymphomas. Fewer than 30% of respondents recognized the mechanisms of action of 5 of the 9 promising investigational agents presented. LIMITATIONS: Participant self-selection bias is a possibility because participation was voluntary. Practice gaps are not based on clinical data, but hypothetical case situations and self-report. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this study can guide education to address the identified challenges in caring for patients with hematologic malignancies and improving patient care. FUNDING: This needs assessment was financially supported with an educational research grant from Pfizer Medical Education Group to the Annenberg Center for Health Sciences at Eisenhower.
BACKGROUND: Treating patients with hematologic malignancies can be challenging for physicians because of the rapidly evolving standards of care and relatively low incidence of these diseases. OBJECTIVE: To identify clinical challenges among hematologists and medical oncologists regarding the provision of care to patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), or B-cell lymphomas. Methods Hematologists and medical oncologists in active practice in the United States and who have a case load of ≥ 1 patient a year with CML, ALL, or B-cell lymphoma were recruited. The initial qualitative phase consisted of an online case-based survey followed by an interview exploring the contextual and behavioral factors that influence treatment decisions (n = 27). The analysis of qualitative data then informed a quantitative phase, in which 121 participants completed an online survey composed of case vignettes, multiple choice, and semantic differential rating scale questions. The respondents' answers were compared with recommendations from treatment guidelines and faculty experts. RESULTS: A higher frequency of bone marrow biopsies was reported compared with expert faculty recommendations by 74% of oncologists. Many respondents failed to recognize the clinical relevance of BCR-ABL mutations other than T315I. Respondents reported perceiving difficulties in individualizing treatment and interpreting response to treatment in patients with ALL and B-cell lymphomas. Fewer than 30% of respondents recognized the mechanisms of action of 5 of the 9 promising investigational agents presented. LIMITATIONS: Participant self-selection bias is a possibility because participation was voluntary. Practice gaps are not based on clinical data, but hypothetical case situations and self-report. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this study can guide education to address the identified challenges in caring for patients with hematologic malignancies and improving patient care. FUNDING: This needs assessment was financially supported with an educational research grant from Pfizer Medical Education Group to the Annenberg Center for Health Sciences at Eisenhower.
Authors: Susan O'Brien; Ellin Berman; Hossein Borghaei; Daniel J Deangelo; Marcel P Devetten; Steven Devine; Harry P Erba; Jason Gotlib; Madan Jagasia; Joseph O Moore; Tariq Mughal; Javier Pinilla-Ibarz; Jerald P Radich; Neil P Shah Md; Paul J Shami; B Douglas Smith; David S Snyder; Martin S Tallman; Moshe Talpaz; Meir Wetzler Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Sharon Barrans; Simon Crouch; Alex Smith; Kathryn Turner; Roger Owen; Russell Patmore; Eve Roman; Andrew Jack Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-05-24 Impact factor: 44.544