Literature DB >> 25810341

Occupational health hazards of interventional cardiologists in the current decade: Results of the 2014 SCAI membership survey.

Lloyd W Klein1, Yolande Tra2, Kirk N Garratt3, Wayne Powell, Georgina Lopez-Cruz, Charles Chambers4, James A Goldstein5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Interventional cardiologists and staff are subject to unique physical demands that predispose them to distinct occupational health hazards not seen in other medical disciplines.
METHODS: To characterize the prevalence of these occupational health problems, The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) surveyed its members by email. Inquiries included age, years of invasive practice, and diagnostic and interventional cases per year. Questions focused on orthopedic (spine, hips, knees, and ankles) and radiation-associated problems (cataracts and cancers).
RESULTS: There were 314 responses. Responders were on average busy and experienced, performing a mean of 380±249 diagnostic and 200±129 interventional cases annually. Of the responders, 6.9% of operators have had to limit their caseload because of radiation exposure and 9.3% have had a health-related period of absence. Furthermore, 153 (49.4%) operators reported at least one orthopedic injury: 24.7% cervical spine disease, 34.4% lumbar spine problems, and 19.6% hip, knee or ankle joint problems. Age was most significantly correlated with orthopedic illnesses: cervical injuries (χ2=150.7, P<0.0001); hip/knee or ankle injuries (χ2=80.9, P<0.0001); lumbar injuries (χ2=147.0, P<0.0001); and any orthopedic illness (χ2= 241.2, P<0.0001). Annual total caseload was also associated: the estimated change in the odds of orthopedic illness for each additional total caseload quintile is 1.0013 (1.0001, 1.0026). There is a small but substantial incidence of cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings are consistent with, and extend the findings, of a prior 2004 SCAI survey, in documenting a substantial prevalence of orthopedic complications among active interventional cardiologists, which persists despite increased awareness.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D/digital subtraction/radiation; angiographic systems; radiation physics/dosimetry; translational studies

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25810341     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.25927

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  20 in total

1.  Prevalence of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders Among Surgeons and Interventionalists: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sherise Epstein; Emily H Sparer; Bao N Tran; Qing Z Ruan; Jack T Dennerlein; Dhruv Singhal; Bernard T Lee
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 14.766

2.  Simulator training to minimize ionizing radiation exposure in the catheterization laboratory.

Authors:  Aric Katz; Avraham Shtub; Amir Solomonica; Adva Poliakov; Ariel Roguin
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-11-05       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Reduction of Fluoroscopy Time and Radiation Dosage During Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Kenichiro Yamagata; Bashar Aldhoon; Josef Kautzner
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2016-08

4.  Current and Future Use of Robotic Devices to Perform Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Review.

Authors:  Elad Maor; Mackram F Eleid; Rajiv Gulati; Amir Lerman; Gurpreet S Sandhu
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 5.  The Development of Robotic Technology in Cardiac and Vascular Interventions.

Authors:  Ali Pourdjabbar; Lawrence Ang; Ryan R Reeves; Mitul P Patel; Ehtisham Mahmud
Journal:  Rambam Maimonides Med J       Date:  2017-07-31

Review 6.  Radiation safety: a focus on lead aprons and thyroid shields in interventional pain management.

Authors:  Bo Kyung Cheon; Cho Long Kim; Ka Ram Kim; Min Hye Kang; Jeong Ae Lim; Nam Sik Woo; Ka Young Rhee; Hae Kyoung Kim; Jae Hun Kim
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2018-10-01

7.  Robotic Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Hype or Hope?

Authors:  Jaidip Chakravartti; Sunil V Rao
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-06-29       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 8.  Zero-fluoroscopy catheter ablation of severe drug-resistant arrhythmia guided by Ensite NavX system during pregnancy: Two case reports and literature review.

Authors:  Guangzhi Chen; Ge Sun; Renfan Xu; Xiaomei Chen; Li Yang; Yang Bai; Shanshan Yang; Ping Guo; Yan Zhang; Chunxia Zhao; Dao Wen Wang; Yan Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 9.  Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Rationale, Implementation, Case Selection and Limitations of Current Technology.

Authors:  Michael Ragosta; Kanwar P Singh
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Occupational radiation exposure and its health effects on interventional medical workers: study protocol for a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Seulki Ko; Hwan Hoon Chung; Sung Bum Cho; Young Woo Jin; Kwang Pyo Kim; Mina Ha; Ye Jin Bang; Yae Won Ha; Won Jin Lee
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.