Literature DB >> 25809865

Racial variation in breast tumor promoter methylation in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study.

Kathleen Conway1, Sharon N Edmiston2, Chiu-Kit Tse3, Christopher Bryant4, Pei Fen Kuan5, Brionna Y Hair3, Eloise A Parrish2, Ryan May6, Theresa Swift-Scanlan7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: African American (AA) women are diagnosed with more advanced breast cancers and have worse survival than white women, but a comprehensive understanding of the basis for this disparity remains unclear. Analysis of DNA methylation, an epigenetic mechanism that can regulate gene expression, could help to explain racial differences in breast tumor clinical biology and outcomes.
METHODS: DNA methylation was evaluated at 1,287 CpGs in the promoters of cancer-related genes in 517 breast tumors of AA (n = 216) or non-AA (n = 301) cases in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study (CBCS).
RESULTS: Multivariable linear regression analysis of all tumors, controlling for age, menopausal status, stage, intrinsic subtype, and multiple comparisons [false discovery rate (FDR)], identified seven CpG probes that showed significant (adjusted P < 0.05) differential methylation between AAs and non-AAs. Stratified analyses detected an additional four CpG probes differing by race within hormone receptor-negative (HR(-)) tumors. Genes differentially methylated by race included DSC2, KCNK4, GSTM1, AXL, DNAJC15, HBII-52, TUSC3, and TES; the methylation state of several of these genes may be associated with worse survival in AAs. TCGA breast tumor data confirmed the differential methylation by race and negative correlations with expression for most of these genes. Several loci also showed racial differences in methylation in peripheral blood leukocytes (PBL) from CBCS cases, indicating that these variations were not necessarily tumor-specific.
CONCLUSIONS: Racial differences in the methylation of cancer-related genes are detectable in both tumors and PBLs from breast cancer cases. IMPACT: Epigenetic variation could contribute to differences in breast tumor development and outcomes between AAs and non-AAs. ©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25809865      PMCID: PMC4452445          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-1228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  46 in total

1.  Characterization of the human class Mu glutathione S-transferase gene cluster and the GSTM1 deletion.

Authors:  S Xu; Y Wang; B Roe; W R Pearson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1998-02-06       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  The TES gene at 7q31.1 is methylated in tumours and encodes a novel growth-suppressing LIM domain protein.

Authors:  E S Tobias; A F Hurlstone; E MacKenzie; R McFarlane; D M Black
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2001-05-17       Impact factor: 9.867

3.  The Carolina Breast Cancer Study: integrating population-based epidemiology and molecular biology.

Authors:  B Newman; P G Moorman; R Millikan; B F Qaqish; J Geradts; T E Aldrich; E T Liu
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Epigenetic profiling of somatic tissues from human autopsy specimens identifies tissue- and individual-specific DNA methylation patterns.

Authors:  Hyang-Min Byun; Kimberly D Siegmund; Fei Pan; Daniel J Weisenberger; Gary Kanel; Peter W Laird; Allen S Yang
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 6.150

5.  Axl is an essential epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition-induced regulator of breast cancer metastasis and patient survival.

Authors:  Christine Gjerdrum; Crina Tiron; Torill Høiby; Ingunn Stefansson; Hallvard Haugen; Tone Sandal; Karin Collett; Shan Li; Emmet McCormack; Bjørn Tore Gjertsen; David R Micklem; Lars A Akslen; Carlotta Glackin; James B Lorens
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-28       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Genetic risk and carcinogen exposure: a common inherited defect of the carcinogen-metabolism gene glutathione S-transferase M1 (GSTM1) that increases susceptibility to bladder cancer.

Authors:  D A Bell; J A Taylor; D F Paulson; C N Robertson; J L Mohler; G W Lucier
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-07-21       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Prenatal tobacco smoke exposure affects global and gene-specific DNA methylation.

Authors:  Carrie V Breton; Hyang-Min Byun; Made Wenten; Fei Pan; Allen Yang; Frank D Gilliland
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 21.405

8.  Genomic DNA methylation among women in a multiethnic New York City birth cohort.

Authors:  Mary Beth Terry; Jennifer S Ferris; Richard Pilsner; Julie D Flom; Parisa Tehranifar; Regina M Santella; Mary V Gamble; Ezra Susser
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor-negative breast cancers of young African-American women have a higher frequency of methylation of multiple genes than those of Caucasian women.

Authors:  Jyoti Mehrotra; M Michelle Ganpat; Yasmine Kanaan; Mary Jo Fackler; Megan McVeigh; Jaana Lahti-Domenici; Kornelia Polyak; Pedram Argani; Tammy Naab; Elizabeth Garrett; Giovanni Parmigiani; Carolyn Broome; Saraswati Sukumar
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Confounding effects in "A six-gene signature predicting breast cancer lung metastasis".

Authors:  Aedín C Culhane; John Quackenbush
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  21 in total

1.  Promoter methylation of TCF21 may repress autophagy in the progression of lung cancer.

Authors:  Baokun Chen; Chao Zeng; Yiwang Ye; Da Wu; Zhimin Mu; Jixian Liu; Yuancai Xie; Hao Wu
Journal:  J Cell Commun Signal       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 5.782

Review 2.  Epigenetic basis of cancer health disparities: Looking beyond genetic differences.

Authors:  Aamir Ahmad; Shafquat Azim; Haseeb Zubair; Mohammad Aslam Khan; Seema Singh; James E Carter; Rodney P Rocconi; Ajay P Singh
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 10.680

3.  Differences in Genome-wide DNA Methylation Profiles in Breast Milk by Race and Lactation Duration.

Authors:  Brittny C Davis Lynn; Clara Bodelon; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Hannah P Yang; Howard H Yang; Maxwell Lee; Peter W Laird; Mihaela Campan; Daniel J Weisenberger; Jeanne Murphy; Joshua N Sampson; Eva P Browne; Douglas L Anderton; Mark E Sherman; Kathleen F Arcaro; Gretchen L Gierach
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2019-09-03

Review 4.  Analysis of Tumor Biology to Advance Cancer Health Disparity Research.

Authors:  Cheryl J Smith; Tsion Z Minas; Stefan Ambs
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2017-11-11       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 5.  TUSC3: functional duality of a cancer gene.

Authors:  Kateřina Vašíčková; Peter Horak; Petr Vaňhara
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 9.261

6.  Racial differences in genome-wide methylation profiling and gene expression in breast tissues from healthy women.

Authors:  Min-Ae Song; Theodore M Brasky; Catalin Marian; Daniel Y Weng; Cenny Taslim; Ramona G Dumitrescu; Adana A Llanos; Jo L Freudenheim; Peter G Shields
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.528

7.  Gene-Level Germline Contributions to Clinical Risk of Recurrence Scores in Black and White Patients with Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Achal Patel; Montserrat García-Closas; Andrew F Olshan; Charles M Perou; Melissa A Troester; Michael I Love; Arjun Bhattacharya
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 8.  Using Genetic Technologies To Reduce, Rather Than Widen, Health Disparities.

Authors:  Caren E Smith; Stephanie M Fullerton; Keith A Dookeran; Heather Hampel; Adrienne Tin; Nisa M Maruthur; Jonathan C Schisler; Jeffrey A Henderson; Katherine L Tucker; José M Ordovás
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 6.301

9.  A transdisciplinary approach to understand the epigenetic basis of race/ethnicity health disparities.

Authors:  Lucas A Salas; Lauren C Peres; Zaneta M Thayer; Rick Wa Smith; Yichen Guo; Wonil Chung; Jiahui Si; Liming Liang
Journal:  Epigenomics       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 4.778

Review 10.  Racial health disparities in ovarian cancer: not just black and white.

Authors:  Sanjeev K Srivastava; Aamir Ahmad; Orlandric Miree; Girijesh Kumar Patel; Seema Singh; Rodney P Rocconi; Ajay P Singh
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 4.234

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.