Literature DB >> 25809359

Feasibility and safety of renal and visceral target vessel cannulation using robotically steerable catheters during complex endovascular aortic procedures.

Frédéric Cochennec1, Hicham Kobeiter2, Manj Gohel3, Jean Marzelle2, Pascal Desgranges2, Eric Allaire2, Jean Pierre Becquemin2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and success of target vessel cannulation in the visceral aortic segment using the Magellan robotic catheter system (RCS) during complex endovascular aortic procedures.
METHODS: Robotic navigation was attempted for access to 37 target vessels in 15 patients (14 men; mean age 75±10 years) during 16 fenestrated and/or branched stent-grafting procedures and 1 endovascular repair requiring the chimney technique. For each target vessel, robotic navigation was attempted for a maximum of 15 minutes; if cannulation was unsuccessful in that time, manual catheters were employed. Safety was evaluated by recording intraoperative adverse events, intraoperative complications related to robotic navigation, and postoperative complications. Technical success of robotic cannulation, wire cannulation times, and times for inserting the leader over the wire in the target vessels were recorded to assess RCS performance.
RESULTS: Successful robotic cannulation was achieved for 30 (81%) of the 37 target vessels, with a median wire cannulation time of 263 seconds (range 40-780) and a median 15 seconds (range 5-450) for inserting the leader over the wire. No intraoperative complications related to robotic navigation were observed. Seven of 27 arteries accessed via 7 fenestrations could not be cannulated within 15 minutes; all were cannulated successfully using conventional catheters (mean cannulation time 31±7 minutes). All 10 target vessels accessed via branches and chimney stents were successfully cannulated with the RCS.
CONCLUSION: Cannulation of target vessels with the RCS during complex endovascular aortic procedures is feasible and safe. The robotic system was particularly effective for branched and chimney stents.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Robotically assisted navigation; abdominal aortic aneurysm; branched stent-graft; catheter; chimney graft; endovascular intervention; fenestrated stent-graft; thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25809359     DOI: 10.1177/1526602815573228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endovasc Ther        ISSN: 1526-6028            Impact factor:   3.487


  6 in total

Review 1.  Endovascular robotics.

Authors:  Alexander Rolls; Celia Riga
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Robotic assistance in interventional radiology: dream or reality?

Authors:  Vania Tacher; Thierry de Baere
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Robotics for neuroendovascular intervention: Background and primer.

Authors:  Kazim H Narsinh; Ricardo Paez; Kerstin Mueller; M Travis Caton; Amanda Baker; Randall T Higashida; Van V Halbach; Christopher F Dowd; Matthew R Amans; Steven W Hetts; Alexander M Norbash; Daniel L Cooke
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2021-08-16

Review 4.  The Development of Robotic Technology in Cardiac and Vascular Interventions.

Authors:  Ali Pourdjabbar; Lawrence Ang; Ryan R Reeves; Mitul P Patel; Ehtisham Mahmud
Journal:  Rambam Maimonides Med J       Date:  2017-07-31

Review 5.  Robot-assisted techniques in vascular and endovascular surgery.

Authors:  A Püschel; C Schafmayer; J Groß
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  The Current Era of Endovascular Aortic Interventions and What the Future Holds.

Authors:  Martin Teraa; Constantijn E V B Hazenberg
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 4.964

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.