Literature DB >> 25807583

Folding in and out: passive morphing in flapping wings.

Amanda K Stowers1, David Lentink.   

Abstract

We present a new mechanism for passive wing morphing of flapping wings inspired by bat and bird wing morphology. The mechanism consists of an unactuated hand wing connected to the arm wing with a wrist joint. Flapping motion generates centrifugal accelerations in the hand wing, forcing it to unfold passively. Using a robotic model in hover, we made kinematic measurements of unfolding kinematics as functions of the non-dimensional wingspan fold ratio (2-2.5) and flapping frequency (5-17 Hz) using stereo high-speed cameras. We find that the wings unfold passively within one to two flaps and remain unfolded with only small amplitude oscillations. To better understand the passive dynamics, we constructed a computer model of the unfolding process based on rigid body dynamics, contact models, and aerodynamic correlations. This model predicts the measured passive unfolding within about one flap and shows that unfolding is driven by centrifugal acceleration induced by flapping. The simulations also predict that relative unfolding time only weakly depends on flapping frequency and can be reduced to less than half a wingbeat by increasing flapping amplitude. Subsequent dimensional analysis shows that the time required to unfold passively is of the same order of magnitude as the flapping period. This suggests that centrifugal acceleration can drive passive unfolding within approximately one wingbeat in small and large wings. Finally, we show experimentally that passive unfolding wings can withstand impact with a branch, by first folding and then unfolding passively. This mechanism enables flapping robots to squeeze through clutter without sophisticated control. Passive unfolding also provides a new avenue in morphing wing design that makes future flapping morphing wings possibly more energy efficient and light-weight. Simultaneously these results point to possible inertia driven, and therefore metabolically efficient, control strategies in bats and birds to morph or recover within a beat.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25807583     DOI: 10.1088/1748-3190/10/2/025001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinspir Biomim        ISSN: 1748-3182            Impact factor:   2.956


  5 in total

1.  How pigeons couple three-dimensional elbow and wrist motion to morph their wings.

Authors:  Amanda K Stowers; Laura Y Matloff; David Lentink
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 2.  Touchdown to take-off: at the interface of flight and surface locomotion.

Authors:  William R T Roderick; Mark R Cutkosky; David Lentink
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 3.  Inspiration for wing design: how forelimb specialization enables active flight in modern vertebrates.

Authors:  Diana D Chin; Laura Y Matloff; Amanda Kay Stowers; Emily R Tucci; David Lentink
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Adaptive compliant structures for flow regulation.

Authors:  Gaetano Arena; Rainer M J Groh; Alex Brinkmeyer; Raf Theunissen; Paul M Weaver; Alberto Pirrera
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.704

5.  Sequential self-folding of polymer sheets.

Authors:  Ying Liu; Brandi Shaw; Michael D Dickey; Jan Genzer
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 14.136

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.