| Literature DB >> 25807517 |
Ben Jones1, David K Hamilton2, Chris E Cooper1.
Abstract
This study examined the effects of Sprint Interval Cycling (SIT) on muscle oxygenation kinetics and performance during the 30-15 intermittent fitness test (IFT). Twenty-five women hockey players of Olympic standard were randomly selected into an experimental group (EXP) and a control group (CON). The EXP group performed six additional SIT sessions over six weeks in addition to their normal training program. To explore the potential training-induced change, EXP subjects additionally completed 5 x 30s maximal intensity cycle testing before and after training. During these tests near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) measured parameters; oxyhaemoglobin + oxymyoglobin (HbO2+ MbO2), tissue deoxyhaemoglobin + deoxymyoglobin (HHb+HMb), total tissue haemoglobin (tHb) and tissue oxygenation (TSI %) were taken. In the EXP group (5.34 ± 0.14 to 5.50 ± 0.14 m.s(-1)) but not the CON group (pre = 5.37 ± 0.27 to 5.39 ± 0.30 m.s(-1)) significant changes were seen in the 30-15 IFT performance. EXP group also displayed significant post-training increases during the sprint cycling: ΔTSI (-7.59 ± 0.91 to -12.16 ± 2.70%); ΔHHb+HMb (35.68 ± 6.67 to 69.44 ± 26.48 μM.cm); and ΔHbO2+ MbO2 (-74.29 ± 13.82 to -109.36 ± 22.61 μM.cm). No significant differences were seen in ΔtHb (-45.81 ± 15.23 to -42.93 ± 16.24). NIRS is able to detect positive peripheral muscle oxygenation changes when used during a SIT protocol which has been shown to be an effective training modality within elite athletes.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25807517 PMCID: PMC4373931 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120338
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Pre-training mean tissue saturation index trace (ΔTSI %) during the test protocol.
Fig 2Group mean pre-training data trace for ΔHHb+HMb, ΔHbO2+MbO2, & ΔtHb.
Individual averaged data (sprint 1-sprint 5) values for pre vs. post training; delta Tissue Saturation Index (ΔTSI (%)) and delta deoxyhaemoglobin + deoxymyoglobin (ΔHHb+HMb), delta oxyhaemoglobin + oxymyoglobin (ΔHbO2+MbO2) and delta total haemoglobin (ΔtHb) in micromolar-centimeters (μM·cm).
| PRE | POST | PRE | POST | PRE | POST | PRE | POST | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ΔTSI (%) | ΔTSI (%) | ΔHHb+HMb | ΔHHb+HMb | ΔHbO2+MbO2 | ΔHbO2+MbO2 | ΔtHb | ΔtHb |
|
| −7.77 | −9.64 | 44.32 | 60.80 | −77.12 | −98.56 | −38.72 | −42.24 |
|
| −9.19 | −16.92 | 41.92 | 111.84 | −80.0 | −144.48 | −45.92 | −39.36 |
|
| −7.30 | −9.65 | 28.0 | 31.04 | −84.96 | −90.56 | −64.16 | −62.40 |
|
| −7.36 | −13.14 | 31.04 | 67.04 | −74.72 | −123.84 | −49.44 | −60.32 |
|
| −6.40 | −11.90 | 30.88 | 64.96 | −47.04 | −84.48 | −20.32 | −19.84 |
|
| −7.49 | −11.71 | 37.92 | 80.96 | −81.92 | −114.24 | −56.32 | −33.44 |
|
| −7.59 ±0.91 | −12.16 | 35.68 ±6.67 | 69.44 | −74.29 ±13.82 | −109.36 | −45.81 ±15.23 | −42.93 ±16.24 |
*Denotes significance. Significant post-training increases (p < 0.05) were seen in ΔTSI; P = .003, ES = 0.75 ± 0.28; ΔHHb+HMb (p < 0.05); P = .016, ES = 0.65 ± 0.32; ΔHbO2+MbO2; P = .028, ES = 0.68 ± 0.45. No significant differences were seen in ΔtHb; P = .563, ES = 0.09 ± 0.29.
Fig 3Experimental group individual pre vs. post training ΔTSI and ΔHHb+Mb values.
Fig 4A non-significant decrease in time to peak desaturation was found post training; P = 0.07, ES = 0.53 ± 0.46.
Individual average and peak power values for pre vs. post training.
| Average Power (w) | Average Power (w) | Peak Power (w) | Peak Power (w) | RPE Borg (1–10) | RPE Borg (1–10) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| PRE | POST | PRE | POST | PRE | POST |
|
| 278.6 | 460.8 | 485.0 | 776.0 | 7.6 | 9.6 |
|
| 289.2 | 418.8 | 474.0 | 647.2 | 8.8 | 7.6 |
|
| 406.8 | 391.4 | 551.0 | 521.4 | 7.8 | 8.2 |
|
| 491.8 | 494.2 | 674.6 | 657.6 | 7.6 | 8.8 |
|
| 411.6 | 398.6 | 624.8 | 645.6 | 7.8 | 8.6 |
|
| 377.2 | 383.0 | 563.8 | 615.4 | 7.0 | 9.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-significant increases were seen in average, peak power output and subject rating of perceived exertion; P = .221, ES = 0.37 ± 0.53. P = .172, ES = 0.45 ± 0.57. P = .135, ES = 0.57 ± 0.64.
Fig 5Group mean data (sprint 1-sprint5) pre vs. post average power & fatigue index (90%CL).
Fig 6Group mean data (sprint 1- sprint5) pre vs. post peak power and fatigue index (90%CL), non-significant reductions in fatigue index were seen.
Fig 7Individual pre vs. post Experimental and Control group 30-15IFT final running rate velocity scores.