Kerrie-Anne Ho1, Siwei Bai, Donel Martin, Angelo Alonzo, Socrates Dokos, Colleen K Loo. 1. From the *School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Black Dog Institute; †Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering, University of New South Wales and ‡Department of Psychiatry, St George Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to examine a bitemporal (BT) transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) electrode montage for the treatment of depression through a clinical pilot study and computational modeling. The safety of repeated courses of stimulation was also examined. METHODS: Four participants with depression who had previously received multiple courses of tDCS received a 4-week course of BT tDCS. Mood and neuropsychological function were assessed. The results were compared with previous courses of tDCS given to the same participants using different electrode montages. Computational modeling examined the electric field maps produced by the different montages. RESULTS: Three participants showed clinical improvement with BT tDCS (mean [SD] improvement, 49.6% [33.7%]). There were no adverse neuropsychological effects. Computational modeling showed that the BT montage activates the anterior cingulate cortices and brainstem, which are deep brain regions that are important for depression. However, a fronto-extracephalic montage stimulated these areas more effectively. No adverse effects were found in participants receiving up to 6 courses of tDCS. CONCLUSIONS: Bitemporal tDCS was safe and led to clinically meaningful efficacy in 3 of 4 participants. However, computational modeling suggests that the BT montage may not activate key brain regions in depression more effectively than another novel montage--fronto-extracephalic tDCS. There is also preliminary evidence to support the safety of up to 6 repeated courses of tDCS.
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to examine a bitemporal (BT) transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) electrode montage for the treatment of depression through a clinical pilot study and computational modeling. The safety of repeated courses of stimulation was also examined. METHODS: Four participants with depression who had previously received multiple courses of tDCS received a 4-week course of BT tDCS. Mood and neuropsychological function were assessed. The results were compared with previous courses of tDCS given to the same participants using different electrode montages. Computational modeling examined the electric field maps produced by the different montages. RESULTS: Three participants showed clinical improvement with BT tDCS (mean [SD] improvement, 49.6% [33.7%]). There were no adverse neuropsychological effects. Computational modeling showed that the BT montage activates the anterior cingulate cortices and brainstem, which are deep brain regions that are important for depression. However, a fronto-extracephalic montage stimulated these areas more effectively. No adverse effects were found in participants receiving up to 6 courses of tDCS. CONCLUSIONS: Bitemporal tDCS was safe and led to clinically meaningful efficacy in 3 of 4 participants. However, computational modeling suggests that the BT montage may not activate key brain regions in depression more effectively than another novel montage--fronto-extracephalic tDCS. There is also preliminary evidence to support the safety of up to 6 repeated courses of tDCS.
Authors: Marom Bikson; Pnina Grossman; Chris Thomas; Adantchede Louis Zannou; Jimmy Jiang; Tatheer Adnan; Antonios P Mourdoukoutas; Greg Kronberg; Dennis Truong; Paulo Boggio; André R Brunoni; Leigh Charvet; Felipe Fregni; Brita Fritsch; Bernadette Gillick; Roy H Hamilton; Benjamin M Hampstead; Ryan Jankord; Adam Kirton; Helena Knotkova; David Liebetanz; Anli Liu; Colleen Loo; Michael A Nitsche; Janine Reis; Jessica D Richardson; Alexander Rotenberg; Peter E Turkeltaub; Adam J Woods Journal: Brain Stimul Date: 2016-06-15 Impact factor: 8.955
Authors: Marom Bikson; Andre R Brunoni; Leigh E Charvet; Vincent P Clark; Leonardo G Cohen; Zhi-De Deng; Jacek Dmochowski; Dylan J Edwards; Flavio Frohlich; Emily S Kappenman; Kelvin O Lim; Colleen Loo; Antonio Mantovani; David P McMullen; Lucas C Parra; Michele Pearson; Jessica D Richardson; Judith M Rumsey; Pejman Sehatpour; David Sommers; Gozde Unal; Eric M Wassermann; Adam J Woods; Sarah H Lisanby Journal: Brain Stimul Date: 2017-12-29 Impact factor: 8.955
Authors: Mayank S Jog; Elizabeth Kim; Cole Anderson; Antoni Kubicki; Rishikesh Kayathi; Kay Jann; Lirong Yan; Amber Leaver; Gerhard Hellemann; Marco Iacoboni; Roger P Woods; Danny J J Wang; Katherine L Narr Journal: Transl Psychiatry Date: 2021-02-24 Impact factor: 6.222