S Anandarajah1, Y Abdalla1, R Dudhia2, L Sonnesen3. 1. 1 James Cook University, Cairns, QLD, Australia. 2. 2 Department of Dental Radiology, Queensland X-ray, Brisbane, Australia. 3. 3 Section of Orthodontics, Department of Odontology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Recently, studies have performed three-dimensional analyses of upper airways in children. However, there was a lack of airway delineation according to anatomical boundaries and/or easily mobile soft-tissue landmarks were used. The aim of the present study was to define new upper airway margins in children on CBCT according to anatomical bony landmarks and to validate the method. METHODS: 25 scans were randomly selected from a larger database containing CBCT scans of children prior to orthodontic treatment (14 girls and 11 boys; mean age, 10.9 ± 2.5 years). Scans were evaluated by two observers. Specific head positioning and virtual orientation protocols were adopted and greyscale thresholding was established for each patient. Volume and minimum cross-sectional area of the oropharynx were calculated. Intra- and interobserver reliability were assessed by reassessment of the CBCTs 2 weeks later. RESULTS: The new airway margins were defined superiorly by a line passing through the palatal plane (anterior nasal spine to posterior nasal spine) extending to the posterior wall of the pharynx, inferiorly by a line passing from the anterosuperior edge of C4 to menton, anteriorly by a line passing from the soft palate to menton, posteriorly and laterally by the respective pharyngeal walls. Method error for airway volume and minimal cross-sectional area was ≤2.00%, and intra- and interobserver reliability ranged from 0.99 to 1.00. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed protocol utilizes easily identifiable bony landmarks to delineate the upper airway on cone beam scans of children and was found to be reliable and reproducible.
OBJECTIVES: Recently, studies have performed three-dimensional analyses of upper airways in children. However, there was a lack of airway delineation according to anatomical boundaries and/or easily mobile soft-tissue landmarks were used. The aim of the present study was to define new upper airway margins in children on CBCT according to anatomical bony landmarks and to validate the method. METHODS: 25 scans were randomly selected from a larger database containing CBCT scans of children prior to orthodontic treatment (14 girls and 11 boys; mean age, 10.9 ± 2.5 years). Scans were evaluated by two observers. Specific head positioning and virtual orientation protocols were adopted and greyscale thresholding was established for each patient. Volume and minimum cross-sectional area of the oropharynx were calculated. Intra- and interobserver reliability were assessed by reassessment of the CBCTs 2 weeks later. RESULTS: The new airway margins were defined superiorly by a line passing through the palatal plane (anterior nasal spine to posterior nasal spine) extending to the posterior wall of the pharynx, inferiorly by a line passing from the anterosuperior edge of C4 to menton, anteriorly by a line passing from the soft palate to menton, posteriorly and laterally by the respective pharyngeal walls. Method error for airway volume and minimal cross-sectional area was ≤2.00%, and intra- and interobserver reliability ranged from 0.99 to 1.00. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed protocol utilizes easily identifiable bony landmarks to delineate the upper airway on cone beam scans of children and was found to be reliable and reproducible.
Authors: Matheus Alves; Carolina Baratieri; Lincoln I Nojima; Matilde C G Nojima; Antônio C O Ruellas Journal: Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2011-07-20 Impact factor: 1.675
Authors: Manuel O Lagravère; Jillian M Gordon; Carlos Flores-Mir; Jason Carey; Giseon Heo; Paul W Major Journal: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 2.650
Authors: M Alves; E S Franzotti; C Baratieri; L K F Nunes; L I Nojima; A C O Ruellas Journal: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg Date: 2012-02-24 Impact factor: 2.789
Authors: Mevlut Celikoglu; Faruk I Ucar; Ahmet E Sekerci; Suleyman K Buyuk; Mustafa Ersoz; Yildiray Sisman Journal: Angle Orthod Date: 2014-03-25 Impact factor: 2.079