Literature DB >> 25806398

A Multimodal Intervention Improves Postanesthesia Care Unit Handovers.

Matthew B Weinger1, Jason M Slagle, Audrey H Kuntz, Jonathan S Schildcrout, Arna Banerjee, Nathaniel D Mercaldo, James L Bills, Kenneth A Wallston, Theodore Speroff, Emily S Patterson, Daniel J France.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Failures of communication are a major contributor to perioperative adverse events. Transitions of care may be particularly vulnerable. We sought to improve postoperative handovers.
METHODS: We introduced a multimodal intervention in an adult and a pediatric postanesthesia care unit (PACU) to improve postoperative handovers between anesthesia providers (APs) and PACU registered nurses (RNs). The intervention included a standardized electronic handover report form, a didactic webinar, mandatory simulation training focused on improving interprofessional communication, and post-training performance feedback. Trained, blinded nurse observers scored PACU handovers during 17 months using a structured tool consisting of 8 subscales and a global score (1-5 scale). Multivariate logistic regression assessed the effect of the intervention on the proportion of observed handovers receiving a global effectiveness rating of ≥3.
RESULTS: Four hundred fifty-two clinicians received the simulation-based training, and 981 handovers were observed and rated. In the adult PACU, the estimated percentages of acceptable handovers (global ratings ≥3) among AP-RN pairs, where neither received simulation-based training (untrained dyads), was 3% (95% confidence interval, 1%-11%) at day 0, 10% (5%-19%) at training initiation (day 40), and 57% (33%-78%) at 1-year post-training initiation (day 405). For AP-RN pairs where at least one received the simulation-based training (trained dyads), these percentages were estimated to be 18% (11%-28%) and 68% (57%-76%) on days 40 and 405, respectively. The percentage of acceptable handovers was significantly greater on day 405 than it was on day 40 for both untrained (P < 0.001) and trained dyads (P < 0.001). Similar patterns were observed in the pediatric PACU. Three years later, the unadjusted estimate of the probability of an acceptable handover was 87% (72%-95%) in the adult PACU and 56% (40%-72%) in the pediatric PACU.
CONCLUSIONS: A multimodal intervention substantially improved interprofessional PACU handovers, including those by clinicians who had not undergone formal simulation training. An effect appeared to be present >3 years later.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25806398     DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000670

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  15 in total

1.  [Caring for patients-but carefully of course : Structured Handover].

Authors:  L Vogt; S Sopka
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Communication: Is There a Standard Handover Technique to Transfer Patient Care?

Authors:  Emily Methangkool; Luis Tollinche; Jamie Sparling; Aalok V Agarwala
Journal:  Int Anesthesiol Clin       Date:  2019

3.  Development of an aviation-style computerized checklist displayed on a tablet computer for improving handoff communication in the post-anesthesia care unit.

Authors:  Srdjan Jelacic; Kei Togashi; Logan Bussey; Bala G Nair; Tim Wu; Daniel J Boorman; Andrew Bowdle
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 4.  Perioperative Information Systems: Opportunities to Improve Delivery of Care and Clinical Outcomes in Cardiac and Vascular Surgery.

Authors:  Robert E Freundlich; Jesse M Ehrenfeld
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2017-11-04       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 5.  [Structured patient handovers in perioperative medicine : Rationale and implementation in clinical practice].

Authors:  M J Merkel; V von Dossow; B Zwißler
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  Operating Room-to-ICU Patient Handovers: A Multidisciplinary Human-Centered Design Approach.

Authors:  Noa Segall; Alberto S Bonifacio; Atilio Barbeito; Rebecca A Schroeder; Sharon R Perfect; Melanie C Wright; James D Emery; B Zane Atkins; Jeffrey M Taekman; Jonathan B Mark
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2016-09

7.  Recommendations of the German Association of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI) on structured patient handover in the perioperative setting : The SBAR concept.

Authors:  V von Dossow; B Zwissler
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.041

8.  [Recommendations of the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine on structured patient handover in the perioperative phase : SBAR concept].

Authors:  V von Dossow; B Zwissler
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.041

9.  Assessment of Staffing and Service Provision in the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit of Hospitals Found in Amhara Regional State, 2020.

Authors:  Basazinew Chekol; Denberu Eshetie; Netsanet Temesgen
Journal:  Drug Healthc Patient Saf       Date:  2021-06-01

10.  Communication failures contributing to patient injury in anaesthesia malpractice claims☆.

Authors:  Rachel N Douglas; Linda S Stephens; Karen L Posner; Joanna M Davies; Shawn L Mincer; Amanda R Burden; Karen B Domino
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 11.719

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.