Literature DB >> 25804748

Immunofluorescence-based methods to monitor DNA end resection.

Bipasha Mukherjee1, Nozomi Tomimatsu, Sandeep Burma.   

Abstract

Double-strand breaks (DSBs) are the most deleterious among all types of DNA damage that can occur in the cell. These breaks arise from both endogenous (e.g., DNA replication stress) and exogenous insults (e.g., ionizing radiation). DSBs are principally repaired by one of two major pathways: nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) or homologous recombination (HR). NHEJ is an error-prone process that can occur in all phases of the cell cycle, while HR is limited to the S and G2 phases of the cell cycle when a sister chromatid is available as a template for error-free repair. The first step in HR is "DNA end resection," a process during which the broken DNA end is converted into a long stretch of 3'-ended single-stranded DNA (ssDNA). In recent years, DNA end resection has been identified as a pivotal step that controls "repair pathway choice," i.e., the appropriate choice between NHEJ and HR for DSB repair. Therefore, methods to quantitatively or semiquantitatively assess DNA end resection have gained importance in laboratories working on DNA repair. In this chapter, we describe two simple immunofluorescence-based techniques to monitor DNA end resection in mammalian cells. The first technique involves immuno-detection of replication protein A (RPA), an ssDNA-binding protein that binds to resected DNA. The second technique involves labeling of genomic DNA with 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU) that can be detected by anti-BrdU antibody only after the DNA becomes single stranded due to resection. These methods are not complicated, do not involve sophisticated instrumentation or reporter constructs, and can be applied to most mammalian cell lines and, therefore, should be of broad utility as simple ways of monitoring DNA end resection in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25804748      PMCID: PMC5482411          DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2522-3_5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  30 in total

1.  Exo1 plays a major role in DNA end resection in humans and influences double-strand break repair and damage signaling decisions.

Authors:  Nozomi Tomimatsu; Bipasha Mukherjee; Katherine Deland; Akihiro Kurimasa; Emma Bolderson; Kum Kum Khanna; Sandeep Burma
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2012-02-11

2.  Nuclear foci of mammalian recombination proteins are located at single-stranded DNA regions formed after DNA damage.

Authors:  E Raderschall; E I Golub; T Haaf
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-03-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  DNA double-strand break repair: all's well that ends well.

Authors:  Claire Wyman; Roland Kanaar
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 16.830

Review 4.  The mechanism of double-strand DNA break repair by the nonhomologous DNA end-joining pathway.

Authors:  Michael R Lieber
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 23.643

5.  BLM-DNA2-RPA-MRN and EXO1-BLM-RPA-MRN constitute two DNA end resection machineries for human DNA break repair.

Authors:  Amitabh V Nimonkar; Jochen Genschel; Eri Kinoshita; Piotr Polaczek; Judith L Campbell; Claire Wyman; Paul Modrich; Stephen C Kowalczykowski
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  Distinct roles of ATR and DNA-PKcs in triggering DNA damage responses in ATM-deficient cells.

Authors:  Nozomi Tomimatsu; Bipasha Mukherjee; Sandeep Burma
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 7.  DNA resection in eukaryotes: deciding how to fix the break.

Authors:  Pablo Huertas
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 15.369

8.  Human SIRT6 promotes DNA end resection through CtIP deacetylation.

Authors:  Abderrahmane Kaidi; Brian T Weinert; Chunaram Choudhary; Stephen P Jackson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Cell cycle regulation of DNA double-strand break end resection by Cdk1-dependent Dna2 phosphorylation.

Authors:  Xuefeng Chen; Hengyao Niu; Woo-Hyun Chung; Zhu Zhu; Alma Papusha; Eun Yong Shim; Sang Eun Lee; Patrick Sung; Grzegorz Ira
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2011-08-14       Impact factor: 15.369

10.  Phosphorylation of EXO1 by CDKs 1 and 2 regulates DNA end resection and repair pathway choice.

Authors:  Nozomi Tomimatsu; Bipasha Mukherjee; Molly Catherine Hardebeck; Mariya Ilcheva; Cristel Vanessa Camacho; Janelle Louise Harris; Matthew Porteus; Bertrand Llorente; Kum Kum Khanna; Sandeep Burma
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  13 in total

1.  Augmented HR Repair Mediates Acquired Temozolomide Resistance in Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Carlos Rodrigo Gil Del Alcazar; Pavlina Krasimirova Todorova; Amyn A Habib; Bipasha Mukherjee; Sandeep Burma
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 5.852

2.  DNA-damage-induced degradation of EXO1 exonuclease limits DNA end resection to ensure accurate DNA repair.

Authors:  Nozomi Tomimatsu; Bipasha Mukherjee; Janelle Louise Harris; Francesca Ludovica Boffo; Molly Catherine Hardebeck; Patrick Ryan Potts; Kum Kum Khanna; Sandeep Burma
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  A Flow Cytometry-Based Method for Analyzing DNA End Resection in G0- and G1-Phase Mammalian Cells.

Authors:  Bo-Ruei Chen; Jessica K Tyler; Barry P Sleckman
Journal:  Bio Protoc       Date:  2022-05-20

4.  METTL16 antagonizes MRE11-mediated DNA end resection and confers synthetic lethality to PARP inhibition in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Xiangyu Zeng; Fei Zhao; Gaofeng Cui; Yong Zhang; Rajashree A Deshpande; Yuping Chen; Min Deng; Jake A Kloeber; Yu Shi; Qin Zhou; Chao Zhang; Jing Hou; Wootae Kim; Xinyi Tu; Yuanliang Yan; Zhijie Xu; Lifeng Chen; Huanyao Gao; Guijie Guo; Jiaqi Liu; Qian Zhu; Yueyu Cao; Jinzhou Huang; Zheming Wu; Shouhai Zhu; Ping Yin; Kuntian Luo; Georges Mer; Tanya T Paull; Jian Yuan; Kaixiong Tao; Zhenkun Lou
Journal:  Nat Cancer       Date:  2022-09-22

5.  Inhibition of ATM Induces Hypersensitivity to Proton Irradiation by Upregulating Toxic End Joining.

Authors:  Qin Zhou; Michelle E Howard; Xinyi Tu; Qian Zhu; Janet M Denbeigh; Nicholas B Remmes; Michael G Herman; Chris J Beltran; Jian Yuan; Patricia T Greipp; Judy C Boughey; Liewei Wang; Neil Johnson; Matthew P Goetz; Jann N Sarkaria; Zhenkun Lou; Robert W Mutter
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  The human HELLS chromatin remodelling protein promotes end resection to facilitate homologous recombination and contributes to DSB repair within heterochromatin.

Authors:  Gabriel Kollárovič; Caitríona E Topping; Edward P Shaw; Anna L Chambers
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  The SWI/SNF ATPase BRG1 stimulates DNA end resection and homologous recombination by reducing nucleosome density at DNA double strand breaks and by promoting the recruitment of the CtIP nuclease.

Authors:  Emily Hays; Elizabeth Nettleton; Caitlin Carter; Mariangel Morales; Lynn Vo; Max Passo; Renier Vélez-Cruz
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 4.534

8.  A Proximity Ligation Method to Detect Proteins Bound to Single-Stranded DNA after DNA End Resection at DNA Double-Strand Breaks.

Authors:  Faith C Fowler; Jessica K Tyler
Journal:  Methods Protoc       Date:  2021-12-29

9.  VLX600 Disrupts Homologous Recombination and Synergizes with PARP Inhibitors and Cisplatin by Inhibiting Histone Lysine Demethylases.

Authors:  Arun Kanakkanthara; Larry M Karnitz; Thomas L Ekstrom; Nicholas M Pathoulas; Amelia M Huehls
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 6.261

10.  FANCJ compensates for RAP80 deficiency and suppresses genomic instability induced by interstrand cross-links.

Authors:  Sanket Awate; Joshua A Sommers; Arindam Datta; Sumeet Nayak; Marina A Bellani; Olivia Yang; Christopher A Dunn; Claudia M Nicolae; George-Lucian Moldovan; Michael M Seidman; Sharon B Cantor; Robert M Brosh
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 19.160

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.