Literature DB >> 25804580

Short-term comparison of accelerated and standard methods of corneal collagen crosslinking.

Hassan Hashemi1, Akbar Fotouhi2, Mohammad Miraftab2, Hooman Bahrmandy2, Mohammad Amin Seyedian2, Kazem Amanzadeh2, Shahab Heidarian2, Hamidreza Nikbin2, Soheila Asgari2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the 6-month results of accelerated and standard collagen crosslinking (CXL) treatment of progressive keratoconus.
SETTING: Noor Eye Hospital, Tehran, Iran.
DESIGN: Prospective randomized clinical trial.
METHODS: Two groups of eyes (intervention and control) received corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) treatment. The intervention group received accelerated CXL (18 mW/cm(2), 5 minutes), and the control group received standard CXL (3 mW/cm(2), 30 minutes). The eyes were evaluated for changes in the visual indices, refraction, and topography preoperatively and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively and regarding corneal rigidity indices and the endothelial cell count (ECC) preoperatively and at 6 months.
RESULTS: The study evaluated 62 eyes (31 patient) in 2 groups. The mean changes in uncorrected (P = .733) and corrected (P = .646) distance visual acuities and manifest refraction spherical equivalent (P = .598) did not differ statistically significantly between the 2 groups. The central corneal thickness was higher in the standard group than the accelerated group (P = .025). The mean decrease in the maximum keratometry (K) (P = .865) and mean K (P = .974) and the mean changes in the asphericity (P = .272) were not statistically significantly different between the 2 groups. The mean changes in corneal hysteresis (CH) (P = .548) and the corneal resistance factor (CRF) (P = 1.000), CH-CRF (P = .282), and the area under the peak 2 (P = .260) were similar in both groups. The mean decrease in the ECC was not statistically significantly different between the 2 groups (P = .218).
CONCLUSION: Based on 6-month results, accelerated and standard corneal CXL arrested the progression of keratoconus similarly. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25804580     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.07.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  29 in total

1.  Complications of accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking: review of 2025 eyes.

Authors:  Semih Çakmak; Mehmet Emin Sucu; Yusuf Yildirim; Burcin Kepez Yildiz; Ahmet Kirgiz; Damla Leman Bektaşoğlu; Ahmet Demirok
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07-26       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  The efficacy of standard versus accelerated epi-off corneal cross-linking protocols: a systematic review and sub-group analysis.

Authors:  Mohammad Miraftab; Hassan Hashemi; Mohammad Abdollahi; Shekoufeh Nikfar; Soheila Asgari
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Systematic review and Meta-analysis comparing modified cross-linking and standard cross-linking for progressive keratoconus.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Yi Liu; Ying-Nan Zhang; Ai-Peng Li; Jing Zhang; Qing-Feng Liang; Ying Jie; Zhi-Qiang Pan
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Comparative study of long-term outcomes of accelerated and conventional collagen crosslinking for progressive keratoconus.

Authors:  J J Males; D Viswanathan
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Corneal crosslinking (CXL) with 18-mW/cm2 irradiance and 5.4-J/cm2 radiant exposure-early postoperative safety.

Authors:  Isaak Fischinger; Theo G Seiler; Karthiga Santhirasegaram; Moritz Pettenkofer; Chris P Lohmann; Daniel Zapp
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Accelerated versus standard corneal cross linking in the treatment of ectasia post refractive surgery and penetrating keratoplasty: a medium term randomized trial.

Authors:  Hany A Khairy; Moataz F Elsawy; Khaled Said-Ahmed; Marwa A Zaki; Sameh S Mandour
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 1.779

7.  Accelerated versus conventional corneal collagen cross-linking in patients with keratoconus: an intrapatient comparative study.

Authors:  Mohammad Mehdi Sadoughi; Bahram Einollahi; Alireza Baradaran-Rafii; Danial Roshandel; Hamidreza Hasani; Mehrdad Nazeri
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 2.031

8.  Accelerated versus Standard Corneal Cross-linking for Progressive Keratoconus in Syria.

Authors:  Abdelrahman M Salman; Taym R Darwish; Yusra H Haddad; Rafea H Shabaan; Mohammad Z Askar
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2021-07-29

9.  Accelerated, Pulsed Collagen Cross-Linking versus the Dresden Protocol in Keratoconus: A Case Series.

Authors:  Nikolaos Dervenis; Panagiotis Dervenis; Nikolaos Dragoumis; Andreas Papandroudis; Zachos Zachariadis; Miltos Balidis
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 1.927

10.  Long-term results of accelerated and conventional corneal cross-linking.

Authors:  Samara Barbara Marafon; Sergio Kwitko; Diane Ruschel Marinho
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 2.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.