Literature DB >> 25803490

Patient perspectives and preferences for communication of medical imaging risks in a cancer care setting.

Raymond H Thornton1, Lawrence T Dauer, Elyse Shuk, Carma L Bylund, Smita C Banerjee, Erin Maloney, Lindsey B Fox, Christopher M Beattie, Hedvig Hricak, Jennifer Hay.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify opportunities for improving patient-centered communication about diagnostic imaging tests that involve the use of radiation in a cancer care setting.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained for this HIPAA-compliant study. Patient knowledge, information sources, and communication preferences were assessed in six focus groups during 2012. The groups consisted of patients undergoing treatment for metastatic colorectal carcinoma, women treated within the past 6 months for early-stage breast carcinoma, men undergoing surveillance after testicular cancer treatment, parents of patients treated for stage I-III neuroblastoma, patients in a thoracic oncology survivorship program, and participants in a lung cancer screening program. A multidisciplinary research team performed thematic content analysis of focus group transcripts. High-level findings were summarized during consensus conferences.
RESULTS: Although they were aware of the long-term risk of cancer from exposure to ionizing radiation, most participants reported that their health care provider did not initiate discussion about benefits and risks of radiation from imaging tests. Most patients obtained information by means of self-directed internet searches. Participants expressed gratitude for tests ("That CT saved my daughter's life," "I'd rather have the radiation dosage than being opened up"), yet they expressed concern about having to initiate discussions ("If you don't ask, nobody is going to tell you anything") and the desire to be offered information concerning the rationale for ordering specific imaging examinations, intervals for follow-up imaging, and testing alternatives. Participants believed that such information should be available routinely and that conversation with their personal physician or endorsed, readily available reference materials were ideal methods for information exchange. Understanding imaging radiation risks and active participation in decision making about imaging were especially important to cancer survivors.
CONCLUSION: A substantial gap exists between patient expectations and current practices for providing information about medical imaging tests that involve the use of radiation. (©) RSNA, 2015

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25803490      PMCID: PMC4976442          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.15132905

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  21 in total

1.  Informed decision making trumps informed consent for medical imaging with ionizing radiation.

Authors:  James A Brink; Marilyn J Goske; John A Patti
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Informing patients about risks and benefits of radiology examinations utilizing ionizing radiation: a legal and moral dilemma.

Authors:  Leonard Berlin
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 5.532

3.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2007

4.  A questionnaire study assessing local physicians, radiologists and interns' knowledge and practice pertaining to radiation exposure related to radiological imaging.

Authors:  Chun-sing Wong; Bingsheng Huang; Ho-kwan Sin; Wai-lam Wong; Ka-ling Yiu; Tiffany Chu Yiu Ching
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 3.528

5.  Patient knowledge and understanding of radiation from diagnostic imaging.

Authors:  Janet M Busey; Laurie A Soine; Jenine R Yager; Eunice Choi; William P Shuman
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 6.  Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2012.

Authors:  Rebecca Siegel; Carol DeSantis; Katherine Virgo; Kevin Stein; Angela Mariotto; Tenbroeck Smith; Dexter Cooper; Ted Gansler; Catherine Lerro; Stacey Fedewa; Chunchieh Lin; Corinne Leach; Rachel Spillers Cannady; Hyunsoon Cho; Steve Scoppa; Mark Hachey; Rebecca Kirch; Ahmedin Jemal; Elizabeth Ward
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  Physicians' and midlevel providers' awareness of lifetime radiation-attributable cancer risk associated with commonly performed CT studies: relationship to practice behavior.

Authors:  Savita Puri; Rui Hu; Robin R Quazi; Susan Voci; Peter Veazie; Robert Block
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 8.  Development of generic quality indicators for patient-centered cancer care by using a RAND modified Delphi method.

Authors:  Eleonora P M M Uphoff; Lianne Wennekes; Cornelis J A Punt; Richard P T M Grol; Hub C H Wollersheim; Rosella P M G Hermens; Petronella B Ottevanger
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.592

9.  Doctors' knowledge of patient radiation exposure from diagnostic imaging requested in the emergency department.

Authors:  Gerben B Keijzers; Charles J Britton
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 7.738

10.  Diagnostic CT scans: assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks.

Authors:  Christoph I Lee; Andrew H Haims; Edward P Monico; James A Brink; Howard P Forman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-03-18       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  17 in total

1.  Prevalence and Correlates of Worry About the Health Harms of Medical Imaging Radiation in the General Population.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hay; Geoffrey S Gold; Raymond E Baser; Hedvig Hricak; Lawrence T Dauer
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2016-05-09

2.  Awareness of radiation risks from CT scans among patients and providers and obstacles for informed decision-making.

Authors:  Angel L Schuster; Howard P Forman; Paula D Strassle; Laura T Meyer; Scott V Connelly; Christoph I Lee
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2017-09-26

3.  Thoracic surgeon and patient focus groups on decision-making in early-stage lung cancer surgery.

Authors:  Rebecca M Schwartz; Ksenia Gorbenko; Samantha M Kerath; Raja Flores; Sheila Ross; Tonya N Taylor; Emanuela Taioli; Claudia Henschke
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 3.404

4.  Prevalence and Correlates of Worry About Medical Imaging Radiation Among United States Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hay; Raymond E Baser; Joy S Westerman; Jennifer S Ford
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2018-10

Review 5.  The cumulative radiation dose paradigm in pediatric imaging.

Authors:  Donald Frush
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 3.629

6.  Patient-Centered Outcomes Related to Imaging Testing in US Primary Care.

Authors:  Monica L Zigman Suchsland; Elizabeth Witwer; Anjali R Truitt; Danielle C Lavallee; Ying Zhang; Philip Posner; Brian Do; Patrick M Bossuyt; Victoria Hardy; Matthew J Thompson
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 5.532

7.  Parental preferences on diagnostic imaging tests for paediatric appendicitis.

Authors:  Claudia Martinez-Rios; Jennifer R McKinney; Nadine Al-Aswad; Arvind K Shergill; Ada F Louffat; Lillian Sung; Karen E Thomas; Suzanne Schuh; George Tomlinson; Rahim Moineddin; Andrea S Doria
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 2.253

8.  Women's experiences and preferences regarding breast imaging after completing breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  Susan Brandzel; Dori E Rosenberg; Dianne Johnson; Mary Bush; Karla Kerlikowske; Tracy Onega; Louise Henderson; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Wendy DeMartini; Karen J Wernli
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.711

9.  Clinical Outcomes After Cardiac Stress Testing Among US Patients Younger Than 65 Years.

Authors:  Vinay Kini; Elias J Dayoub; Paul L Hess; Lucas N Marzec; Frederick A Masoudi; P Michael Ho; Peter W Groeneveld
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 5.501

10.  Radiation exposure awareness from patients undergoing nuclear medicine diagnostic 99mTc-MDP bone scans and 2-deoxy-2-(18F) fluoro-D-glucose PET/computed tomography scans.

Authors:  Ana S F Ribeiro; Olga Husson; Nicholas Drey; Iain Murray; Katherine May; Jim Thurston; Wim J G Oyen
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.698

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.