Literature DB >> 25803198

Changes in Peripheral Refractive Profile after Orthokeratology for Different Degrees of Myopia.

José Manuel González-Méijome1, Miguel A Faria-Ribeiro1, Daniela P Lopes-Ferreira1, Paulo Fernandes1, Gonzalo Carracedo2, Antonio Queiros1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of orthokeratology for different degrees of myopia correction in the relative location of tangential (F(T)) and sagittal (F(S)) power errors across the central 70° of the visual field in the horizontal meridian.
METHODS: Thirty-four right eyes of 34 patients with a mean age of 25.2 ± 6.4 years were fitted with Paragon CRT (Mesa, AZ) rigid gas permeable contact lenses to treat myopia (-2.15 ± 1.26D, range: -0.88 to -5.25D). Axial and peripheral refraction were measured along the central 70° of the horizontal visual field with the Grand Seiko WAM5500 open-field auto-refractor. Spherical equivalent (M), as well as tangential (FT) and sagittal power errors (FS) were obtained. Analysis was stratified in three groups according to baseline spherical equivalent: Group 1 [M(Baseline) = -0.88 to -1.50D; n = 11], Group 2 [M(Baseline) = -1.51 to -2.49D; n = 11], and Group 3 [M(Baseline) = -2.50 to -5.25D; n = 12].
RESULTS: Spherical equivalent was significantly more myopic after treatment beyond the central 40° of the visual field (p < 0.001). FT became significantly more myopic for all groups in the nasal and temporal retina with 25° (p ≤ 0.017), 30° (p ≤ 0.007) and 35° (p ≤ 0.004) of eye rotation. Myopic change in FS was less consistent, achieving only statistical significance for all groups at 35° in the nasal and temporal retina (p ≤ 0.045).
CONCLUSIONS: Orthokeratology changes significantly FT in the myopic direction beyond the central 40° of the visual field for all degrees of myopia. Changes induced by orthokeratology in relative peripheral M, FT and FS with 35° of eye rotation were significantly correlated with axial myopia at baseline.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Field curvature; myopia; orthokeratology; peripheral astigmatism

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25803198     DOI: 10.3109/02713683.2015.1009634

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Eye Res        ISSN: 0271-3683            Impact factor:   2.424


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of myopia progression between children wearing three types of orthokeratology lenses and children wearing single-vision spectacles.

Authors:  Yo Nakamura; Osamu Hieda; Isao Yokota; Satoshi Teramukai; Chie Sotozono; Shigeru Kinoshita
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  A New Method to Analyze the Relative Corneal Refractive Power and Its Association to Myopic Progression Control With Orthokeratology.

Authors:  Jinghui Wang; Dan Yang; Hua Bi; Bei Du; Weiping Lin; Tianpu Gu; Bin Zhang; Ruihua Wei
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 3.283

3.  The Topographical Effect of Optical Zone Diameter in Orthokeratology Contact Lenses in High Myopes.

Authors:  G Carracedo; T M Espinosa-Vidal; I Martínez-Alberquilla; L Batres
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 1.909

4.  The Role of Back Optic Zone Diameter in Myopia Control with Orthokeratology Lenses.

Authors:  Jaume Pauné; Silvia Fonts; Lina Rodríguez; Antonio Queirós
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Simultaneous measurements of foveal and peripheral aberrations with accommodation in myopic and emmetropic eyes.

Authors:  Dmitry Romashchenko; Petros Papadogiannis; Peter Unsbo; Linda Lundström
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 3.732

6.  Comparative Study of Relative Peripheral Refraction in Children With Different Degrees of Myopia.

Authors:  Lu Xiaoli; Zheng Xiangyue; Lian Lihua; Huang Yuting; Lin Chuni; Xia Yujie; Wang Zhao; Yu Xiaoyi
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-10

7.  Comparison of peripheral refraction and higher-order aberrations between orthokeratology and multifocal soft contact lens designed with highly addition.

Authors:  Yingying Huang; Xue Li; Chenglu Ding; Yunyun Chen; Xinjie Mao; Hao Chen; Jinhua Bao
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 8.  Electroretinogram responses in myopia: a review.

Authors:  Satish Kumar Gupta; Ranjay Chakraborty; Pavan Kumar Verkicharla
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 1.854

Review 9.  Peripheral refraction and higher order aberrations.

Authors:  Dmitry Romashchenko; Robert Rosén; Linda Lundström
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 2.742

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.