Literature DB >> 25802859

Biodiversity and γ-aminobutyric acid production by lactic acid bacteria isolated from traditional alpine raw cow's milk cheeses.

Elena Franciosi1, Ilaria Carafa1, Tiziana Nardin2, Silvia Schiavon2, Elisa Poznanski3, Agostino Cavazza1, Roberto Larcher2, Kieran M Tuohy1.   

Abstract

"Nostrano-cheeses" are traditional alpine cheeses made from raw cow's milk in Trentino-Alto Adige, Italy. This study identified lactic acid bacteria (LAB) developing during maturation of "Nostrano-cheeses" and evaluated their potential to produce γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), an immunologically active compound and neurotransmitter. Cheese samples were collected on six cheese-making days, in three dairy factories located in different areas of Trentino and at different stages of cheese ripening (24 h, 15 days, and 1, 2, 3, 6, and 8 months). A total of 1,059 LAB isolates were screened using Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA-PCR (RAPD-PCR) and differentiated into 583 clusters. LAB strains from dominant clusters (n = 97) were genetically identified to species level by partial 16S rRNA gene sequencing. LAB species most frequently isolated were Lactobacillus paracasei, Streptococcus thermophilus, and Leuconostoc mesenteroides. The 97 dominant clusters were also characterized for their ability in producing GABA by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). About 71% of the dominant bacteria clusters evolving during cheeses ripening were able to produce GABA. Most GABA producers were Lactobacillus paracasei but other GABA producing species included Lactococcus lactis, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Pediococcus pentosaceus, and Streptococcus thermophilus. No Enterococcus faecalis or Sc. macedonicus isolates produced GABA. The isolate producing the highest amount of GABA (80.0±2.7 mg/kg) was a Sc. thermophilus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25802859      PMCID: PMC4352725          DOI: 10.1155/2015/625740

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Res Int            Impact factor:   3.411


1. Introduction

Traditional alpine raw milk cheeses are commonly produced in alpine regions including the province of Trentino in North-Eastern Italy. Here they are called “Nostrano-cheeses” and are semicooked cheese made by mixing approximately in 1 : 1 ratio the raw cow's milk from two different milking. The first milking is carried to dairy factory the evening before the cheese-making and is stored in large shallow tank for 9–11 hours where a spontaneous creaming occurs. After this overnight stage, the partially skimmed milk under the cream in the tank is manually drained from the cream fat and placed in the cheese-making vat. The whole milk from the morning milking, the second milking, is then added to the skimmed milk. No commercial lactic starters are added and the natural milk microbiota obtained from the overnight skimmed milk initiates the acidification process. The vat milk is coagulated by commercial rennet and, after the manual cutting, the curd is cooked at about 48°C. After moulding and salting, the ripening is held at about 18°C for 3 to 8 months. The milk for “Nostrano-cheeses” typically comes from Holstein Friesian and/or Brown Swiss cattle breeds, which are fed differently during the year. The cows are typically fed on hay during the cold season in the valleys and from late June to middle September (summer season) are grazed on high mountain alpine pasture. It has been reported that the use of commercial starters in raw milk cheeses may modify the characteristics of the cheese microbiota, in particular lowering the microbial biodiversity [1] and it is also well known that mainly LAB microbiota developing during ripening influences the typical organoleptic characteristics of the cheese [2]. Thus, LAB represent a fundamental process factor for the final attributes and quality of artisan dairy products such as alpine cheeses. Several studies have focused on the genotypic and technological characterization of LAB isolated from different traditionally fermented cheeses [3-6], but little work has so far been done on “Nostrano-cheeses.” In addition to the technological relevance of LAB in cheese, there is currently much research and industry interest in the potential biological activity of dairy LAB, either for use as probiotics in their own wright or as bioactive agents capable of modulating the health functionality of cheese and other dairy products [7]. Raw milk cheeses have already been identified as a useful source of microbial biodiversity and new LAB strains with health promoting properties [8]. Since caseins are rich in glutamate which is released by proteolytic action, the decarboxylation of this amino acid into γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) can have an important effect on the formation of eyes in cheese [9]. Besides its technological effect in cheese, GABA has several well-characterized physiological functions in mammals including neurotransmission, induction of hypotension, diuretic and tranquilizer effects, and stimulation of immune cells [10-12]. Some studies have reported also that GABA derived from the gut may be a neuroactive molecule within the gut-brain axis [13], which is a complex communication highway linking the gut environment with both the central and peripheral nervous systems. Strains of Lb. buchneri [14], Lb. brevis, Lb. paracasei, and Lb. plantarum [15] isolated from traditional cheeses have been shown to produce GABA. GABA-producing LAB have not been isolated and extensively characterised from traditional alpine cheeses produced in Trento, though the presence of GABA in these cheeses has been confirmed and its concentration at the end of ripening reported at between 120 and 1,739 mg/kg [16], which is high compared to other Italian cheese varieties (typically 0.260 to 391 mg/kg) [15]. Therefore, the objective of this study was to analyze the diversity and the successional development of LAB in traditional “Nostrano-cheeses” from the Trento alps during cold and summer seasons and to extensively screen and identify GABA-producing LAB isolates.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cheese Factories and Milk Sampling

Cheeses were sampled in three dairy factories (called B, C, and D according to a previous paper [17]) located throughout the Trentino region and producing traditional alpine cheeses called “Nostrano-cheeses.” Each factory collected milk from farms within a 15 km radius. Two cheese batches from each dairy factory, one in February and the other in July, were sampled, making a total of six batches subjected to microbiological analyses. All factories processed milk obtained from stabled cows fed with hay during the “cold season” from October to May and high mountain pasture fed cattle in the summer season from June to September. For each of the six batches, at least five cheese samples at different stages of ripening were collected (24 hours, 15 days, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months and for five batches also 6 and 8 months) making a total of 40 cheese samples per factory.

2.2. Enumeration and Isolation of Microorganisms

Cheese samples (25 g) were homogenized (2 min at 260 rpm) using a stomacher (laboratory blender stomacher 400, Seward, London, UK) in 225 g peptone water (0.1% mycological peptone (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK)) and serially diluted. Dilutions were plated and incubated as follows: onto MRS agar acidified to pH 5.5 with 5 mol/L lactic acid, anaerobically, for 2 days, at 30°C and 45°C for mesophilic and thermophilic rod-shaped LAB, respectively; onto MRS agar added with vancomycin (8 μg/mL; Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MI,US) [18] and acidified to pH 5.5 with 5 mol/L lactic acid, anaerobically, for 72 h at 30°C for mesophilic heterofermentative rod-shaped LAB; onto M17 agar for 2 days, aerobically, at 30°C and anaerobically at 45°C for mesophilic and thermophilic coccoid LAB, respectively; onto KAA aerobically, for two days, at 37°C for enterococci; onto PCA added with 10 g/L skimmed milk aerobically, for 24 h, incubated at 30°C for total bacterial count (TBC). All culture media were purchased from Oxoid. At least three colonies were picked from each countable plate; Gram-positive colonies (as determined by KOH method; [19]) and negative to the catalase test (as determined by transferring fresh colonies from agar medium to a glass slide and adding 5% H2O2) were isolated. Cell morphology was determined by microscopic observation. Each isolate was purified by subsequent culturing onto M17 or MRS and pure cultures were stored at −80°C in glycerol (20% v/v) stocks.

2.3. DNA Extraction and RAPD-PCR

DNA was extracted from overnight broth cultures of isolated strains. Cells were centrifuged at 10,000 ×g for 5 min and the pellets were washed twice in sterile distilled water and suspended in 1 mL of distilled water. Cell lysis was achieved using the Instagene Matrix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) following the manufacturer's instruction. RAPD-PCR was carried out in a total volume of 25 μL using primer PC1 [20]. Cluster analysis of DNA patterns was carried out using GelCompar II-BioNumerics software (package version 6.0; Applied Maths, Belgium), exploiting the unweighted pair group method arithmetic averages (UPGMA). Similarity of PCR fingerprinting profiles was calculated based on Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient. The threshold breakpoint value was fixed to 80%; isolates with similarity coefficient higher than 80% were classified into the same cluster, according to Gatti et al. [21].

2.4. Genotypic Identification of LAB

One isolate representative of each LAB cluster was genotypically identified by 16S rRNA gene analysis. All isolates from M17 45°C were tested by Sc. thermophilus species specific PCR according to Lick et al. [22]; isolates from M17 at 30°C by Lc. lactis lactis/cremoris species specific PCR according to Delorme et al. [23]; and all the other isolates from MRS at 30°C by Lb. casei, Lb. paracasei, and Lb. rhamnosus species specific PCR with the primers Y2, Casei, Para, and Rham described by Ward and Timmins [24]. If the species specific PCR gave a negative result, identification was carried out by using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The sequence analysis of a 16S rRNA fragment gene was performed using 27f (5′-GAGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′) and 1495r (5′-CTACGGCTACCTTGTTACGA-3′) primers, designed by Grifoni et al. [25]. The obtained PCR products (ca. 30 ng) were purified with Exo-SAP-IT kit (USB Co., Cleveland, OH) and sequenced through the BigDye Terminator v1.1 cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) as reported by the manufacturer in an ABI PRISM 3100 sequencer (Applied Biosystems). Species were assigned after comparison of the obtained sequences by BLAST alignment (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST). All the amplicons were analyzed by electrophoresis on 2.5% (w/v) agarose gel (Gibco BRL, Cergy Pontoise, France) at 100 V for 90 minutes in 1X TAE buffer and were revealed by staining with ethidium bromide (0.5 μg/L). All amplifications were performed with a T100 Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories).

2.5. γ-Aminobutyric Acid (GABA) Production and Quantification

Glutamate decarboxylase (GAD) activity of LAB isolates and the production of GABA were checked using the method of Nomura et al. [26], with some modifications; cultures were centrifuged (9,000 rpm for 15 min at 4°C), washed twice with sterile PBS, and suspended in sterile 0.85% NaCl solution in order to achieve the A 620 nm value of 2.5. Afterward; 100 μL of cell suspension was mixed with 900 μL of 50 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 4.7) containing 7.0 mM L-glutamate and 0.1 mM pyridoxal phosphate. The reaction mixture was incubated for 24 h at the same temperature of isolation (30°C for mesophilic and 45°C for thermophilic isolates) and filtered through a 0.22 μm pore size filter (Minisart, Sartorius Stedim Biotech, Goettingen, Germany). The sample, diluted 10 times with sodium tetraborate 0.1 M (pH adjusted to 10.5) and added to glycine, as internal standard to a final concentration of 10 mg/L, was stored at −20°C before the analysis. L-Glutamic acid, glycine, and GABA were quantified as o-phthalaldehyde (OPA) adducts modifying the method proposed by Lehtonen [27] in order to notably reduce the time of separation to only 2.7 minutes but without worsening selectivity and accuracy. This was possible in the light of the specifically designed and perfectly known matrix. The measures were performed using an UHPLC Ultimate 3000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with a fluorescence detector (Ex = 336 nm, Em = 445 nm). Separation was carried out with sodium acetate 0.05 M (pH adjusted to 7.5; eluent A) and methanol (eluent B) using a column Chromolith Performance RP-18e (100 × 4.6 mm; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) with Guard Cartridge Chromolith RP-18e (10 × 4.6 mm; Merck) at 40°C. The flow rate was set at 2 mL/min. The analytical gradient for eluent B was as follows: 40% for 30 sec, 25% for 90 sec, 100% for 30 sec and 60% for 15 sec. The sample (10 μL), kept at 10°C by the autosampler, was automatically introduced into the loop, added with 10 μL derivatising solution, mixed for 1 min, and injected. The derivatising mix was 4.5 g/L of OPA (Sigma-Aldrich) in sodium tetraborate 0.1 M, corrected to pH 10.5, 10% methanol, and 2% 2-mercaptoethanol (Sigma-Aldrich). The detection limit for GABA was estimated at 0.025 mg/L (3 times the standard deviation of the GABA contents measured repeating 10 times the analysis of a sample at unquantifiable content).

3. Results

3.1. Microbial Cell Counts

The microbial populations of Nostrano-cheese samples were estimated on different selective media (Table 1). The total bacterial counts were in the range of 8-9 log cfu/g from 24 h to 3 months of ripening and decreased after 6 and 8 months by 1 order of magnitude. The thermophilic cocci reached the highest counts after 24 h of ripening (mean values of 8.5 log cfu/g); mesophilic cocci reached the highest counts after 2 mo of ripening (mean values of 8.1 log cfu/g). Enterococci were never dominant and reached their highest count after 15 days of ripening (mean values of 6.2 log cfu/g). The lactobacilli group (counts onto MRS at 45 and 30°C) was higher after 1 mo of ripening. The growth dynamic of the different microbial groups was different (Table 1); thermophilic cocci counts (onto M17 45°C) were dominant in the first 24 hours; after 15 days to 3 months of ripening, mesophilic cocci (onto M17 30°C) and lactobacilli counts (onto MRS and MRS VAN 30°C) started to increase and were dominant together with thermophilic cocci; finally, at the end of ripening (6 and 8 months) mesophilic lactobacilli and thermophilic cocci maintained the dominance within the alpine cheeses microbiota.
Table 1

Bacterial counts from cheese (n = 6 for each time ripening) sampled at 24 h, 15 days, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, and 8 months.

Ripening timeAgar media (log⁡cfu/g)
PCA MRS 45MRS 30 MRS VANM17 45M17 30KAA
24 h8.5 ± 0.85.2 ± 0.65.3 ± 0.64.6 ± 1.48.5 ± 0.66.6 ± 0.65.6 ± 1.4
15 d9.0 ± 0.55.1 ± 0.78.1 ± 0.87.7 ± 0.67.9 ± 1.27.8 ± 0.66.2 ± 1.0
1 month8.8 ± 0.46.2 ± 1.08.3 ± 0.58.1 ± 0.57.8 ± 0.97.8 ± 0.85.7 ± 1.2
2 months8.7 ± 0.36.3 ± 0.88.0 ± 0.48.0 ± 0.47.2 ± 0.78.1 ± 0.35.7 ± 1.4
3 months8.4 ± 0.65.7 ± 0.77.8 ± 0.77.5 ± 0.77.1 ± 0.96.7 ± 1.65.7 ± 0.6
6 monthsa 7.7 ± 0.65.6 ± 1.57.0 ± 0.47.5 ± 0.96.9 ± 1.05.9 ± 1.45.7 ± 0.6
8 monthsa 6.9 ± 0.75.2 ± 1.06.5 ± 0.96.5 ± 0.66.0 ± 1.14.6 ± 1.54.6 ± 1.0

a n = 5.

On average, three colonies, for each colony morphology, were isolated in pure culture from each medium. For summer season at 6 and 8 months, only two types of cheese were available and sampled in dairy factories C and D. A total of 1,105 isolates were collected. From the total number of isolates, 46 were discarded from further analysis as nonlactic acid bacteria (they were found positive to catalase and negative to KOH tests). The remaining 1,059 strains were characterised for cell morphology; 677 were cocci and 382 were rods (Table 2).
Table 2

Number of putative LAB strains (cocci/rods) isolated from each plate at different sampling times in traditional alpine cheeses (n = 6).

Ripening timeAgar media (cocci/rods)TOT number of LAB isolates (cocci/rods)
MRS 45MRS 30MRS VANM17 45M17 30KAA
24 h12(7/5)19(15/4)8(8/0)18(18/0)20(18/2)22 (21/1)99(88/11)
15 d8(8/0)38 (10/28)15(1/14)18(17/1)31(24/7)27(22/5)137(82/55)
1 month19(10/9)43 (15/28)42 (19/23)31(28/3)34 (28/6)21 (20/1)190(120/70)
2 months28 (16/12)54 (17/19)49 (20/39)36(35/1)46 (33/13)22 (19/3)235(140/95)
3 months18(13/5)48 (21/27)46 (24/22)25(24/1)23(22/1)24 (17/7)184(121/63)
6 monthsa 8(4/4)30 (18/12)25(8/17)16(13/3)22(22/0)12(9/3)113(74/39)
8 monthsa 15(5/10)20(5/15)16(4/12)25(19/6)16(15/1)9(5/4)101(48/48)

TOT108 (63/45)252(101/151)201 (84/117)169(154/15)192(162/30)137(113/24)1059(677/382)

an = 5.

3.2. Molecular Clustering of LAB Isolates and Species Identification

All putative LAB isolates were analyzed by RAPD-PCR as a first grouping into clusters. The isolates from the same kind of cheese showing a RAPD similarity coefficient of at least 80% were considered as belonging to a single cluster. The RAPD-PCR analysis grouped 1,059 LAB into 583 clusters with 80% similarity index (results not shown). From these clusters, 276 isolates were selected for further analysis because they belonged to the dominant microbial populations as enumerated by plate counts on MRS, MRS VAN at 30°C, M17 at 30, and 45°C. The RAPD-PCR analysis of these 276 dominant isolates discriminated 97 different clusters defined at a minimum similarity level of 80% (Figure 1). The 97 clusters were designated using a progressive number followed by the letters B, C, or D to indicate the dairy of origin of the clustered isolates (Figure 1; clusters 1D to 97C).
Figure 1

Unrooted dendrogram of the 276 dominant isolates obtained from RAPD-PCR patterns using the Pearson product moment correlation coefficient (r) and the unweighted pair group algorithm with arithmetic averages (UPGMA). Each circle-pie is a cluster and the number of slices represents the number of isolates for each cluster. GABA producer clusters are indicated by a yellow circle. Each color is a different species.

Species identification was performed by species specific PCRs or partial 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Table 3 shows the results of bacteria identification for each ripening time. The highest diversity within a single species was found for Lb. paracasei and Sc. thermophilus with 35 and 23 different genotypes, respectively.
Table 3

Number of isolates and species found at each of the sampling time in traditional alpine cheeses (n = 6).

Ripening time Lb. paracasei Sc. thermophilus Ln. mesenteroides Ec. faecalis Lc. lactis Pc. pentosaceus Lb. acidipiscis Sc. macedonicus Lb. casei Lb. coryniformis Lb. rhamnosus Lb. curvatus Lb. plantarum Lb. delbrueckii Total dominant isolates
24 h1962128
15 d208311142343
1 month2010123222556
2 months1410138243221160
3 months153131552347
6 monthsa 12112622
8 monthsa 7335220

TOT88504513131211111076631276

a n = 5.

Lb. paracasei was the dominant species (72 isolated on MRS and 16 on M17 agar plates), followed by Sc. thermophilus (50 isolated on M17 agar) and Ln. mesenteroides (27 isolated on MRS and 18 on M17 agar). A different dominant species successional development was observed in cheeses at different ripening time: Sc. thermophilus was always dominant in the first 24 hours and one of the codominant species for up to 2 months of ripening; Lc. lactis species was also found codominant in cheese at 24 h ripening with Sc. thermophilus. Streptococci and enterococci species were recorded in abundance in the first three months but largely disappeared after six months and at the end of ripening (Table 3). We did not find difference in species distribution between cheeses sampled in February and July. The same species were recorded both in cold and in summer season (data not shown). After the genotypic characterization, 97 strains, one representative of each dominant cluster, were processed for the detection of GABA production.

3.3. GABA Production

Sixty-eight isolates out of the 97 different clusters synthesized GABA (GABA amount > 0.25 mg/kg) after 24 h of incubation at 30 or 45°C in presence of glutamic acid (Table 4). They grouped 195 of the dominant isolates (71% of the tot) and in particular three (1 Lb. paracasei, 1 Lb. rhamnosus, and 1 Sc. thermophilus) were able to produce GABA concentrations higher than 10 mg/L (Table 4, lines in bold).The Sc. thermophilus, cluster 84C showed the highest glutamate decarboxylase activity generating a mean value of 80 mg/L of GABA (Table 4, first line). No Ec. Faecalis or Sc. macedonicus isolate was able to produce amount of GABA higher than 0.25 mg/kg.
Table 4

GABA production (Mean ± sd) of the dominant clusters in sodium acetate buffer containing 7.0 mM L-glutamate after incubation for 24 h at the same temperature of the isolation medium. Clusters are ordered from the highest to lowest GABA producer.

ClusterSpeciesIsolate numberRipening timeIsolation medium and temperatureGABA production (mg/kg)
84C Sc. thermophilus 3 24 h, 1-2 months M17 45 80.0 ± 2.7
15C Lb. paracasei 4 3–8 months MRS 30 14.8 ± 5.3
21D-B Lb. rhamnosus 6 24 h, 1-2 months MRS (30, VAN) 11.3 ± 0.72

24D Lc. lactis cremoris 224 h, 6 monthsM17 309.0 ± 0.21
62B Pc. pentosaceus 11 month MRS 306.7 ± 0.61
80B Lb. plantarum 215 dMRS 305.2 ± 0.56
59B Lb. paracasei 115 dMRS VAN4.9 ± 0.20
70B Lb. paracasei 115 dMRS VAN4.6 ± 0.21
22B Lb. paracasei 315 dMRS (30, VAN)4.2 ± 0.41
49B Lb. paracasei 11 monthMRS 304.0 ± 0.8
54C Lb. paracasei 13 months MRS 304.0 ± 0.69
73D-C Lb. paracasei 31–6 monthsM17 30, MRS 304.0 ± 0.29
20B-C Lb. paracasei 315 d, 3 months MRS 304.0 ± 0.18
66B Lb. paracasei 115 dMRS 304.0 ± 0.18
77D Lb. paracasei 181-2–6 monthsM17 30, MRS (30–45, VAN)3.7 ± 0.71
68B Lb. casei 32 months MRS 303.6 ± 0.32
25D Lc. lactis lactis 115 dM17 302.8 ± 0.10
71B Lb. paracasei 115 dMRS VAN2.5 ± 0.52
28B Lb. paracasei 115 dMRS VAN2.5 ± 0.44
69B Lb. paracasei 115 dMRS VAN2.4 ± 0.31
34C Lb. paracasei 115 dMRS VAN2.3 ± 0.37
50D Lb. paracasei 1015 d, 2-3–6–8 monthsM17 30, MRS (30, VAN)2.3 ± 0.25
76D Lb. casei 524 h, 15 dMRS 302.2 ± 0.71
36C Lb. paracasei 31-2 monthsM17 30, MRS 302.2 ± 0.41
58C Lb. casei 23 months MRS VAN2.2 ± 0.14
75C Lb. paracasei 11 month M17 302.2 ± 0.14
51B Lb. paracasei 215 dMRS 302.1 ± 0.96
72D Sc. thermophilus 22 months MRS 302.1 ± 0.11
65B Lb. paracasei 115 dMRS 301.9 ± 0.69
38C Lb. paracasei 12 months MRS 301.8 ± 0.40
79B Lb. paracasei 21–3 monthsMRS 301.6 ± 0.39
52B-C Lb. paracasei 515 d, 2–6 monthsMRS (30, VAN)1.6 ± 0.32
37D Lb. paracasei 11 month MRS VAN1.6 ± 0.15
4B Lb. paracasei 22–6 monthsM17 30, MRS 301.5 ± 0.13
78B Pc. pentosaceus 21-2 monthsMRS 301.46 ± 0.08
53D Lb. curvatus 51 month MRS (30, VAN)1.4 ± 0.98
14C Pc. pentosaceus 23 months MRS VAN1.4 ± 0.89
29D Lb. coryniformis ssp. torquens 28 months MRS 301.4 ± 0.11
35C Lb. paracasei 41 month MRS (30, VAN)1.33 ± 0.066
32C Lc. lactis lactis 424 hMRS 30, M17 451.3 ± 0.37
31C Lb. paracasei 12 months MRS VAN1.3 ± 0.13
17C Lb. paracasei 42–8 monthsMRS (30, VAN)1.2 ± 0.94
74D-C Lb. paracasei 12 months MRS 301.1 ± 0.22
55C Pc. pentosaceus 23 months MRS 301.06 ± 0.044
43B Pc. pentosaceus 26 months MRS 301.00 ± 0.099
23B Lb. paracasei 315 d, 3 monthsMRS VAN1.0 ± 0.54
67B Lb. paracasei 11 month MRS 301.0 ± 0.15
5B Lb. paracasei 13 months MRS 301.0 ± 0.12
61C Lb. paracasei 28 months MRS 300.88 ± 0.081
39C Ln. mesenteroides 53 months MRS (30, VAN)0.8 ± 0.64
18C Lb. paracasei 33 months MRS (30, VAN)0.8 ± 0.20
60C Pc. pentosaceus 315 d, 2-3 monthsMRS (30, VAN)0.72 ± 0.058
19D Lb. coryniformis ssp. torquens 32-3 monthsMRS (30, VAN)0.6 ± 0.12
95B Sc. thermophilus 115 dM17 450.6 ± 0.10
94B Sc. thermophilus 215 d, 2 monthsM17 450.57 ± 0.071
40C Ln. mesenteroides 61-2 monthsMRS (30, VAN)0.57 ± 0.013
8C Sc. thermophilus 115 dM17 450.56 ± 0.045
45D-C Ln. mesenteroides 1815 d, 1-2-3–8 monthsM17 30, MRS (30, VAN)0.54 ± 0.060
3B Sc. thermophilus 224 hM17 450.52 ± 0.041
26D Lb. paracasei 1 8 monthsM17 450.50 ± 0.42
83C Sc. thermophilus 515 d, 3 monthsM17 450.50 ± 0.046
87C Sc. thermophilus 224 hM17 450.5 ± 0.24
44D-C Ln. mesenteroides 52–6 monthsM17 30, MRS (30, VAN)0.48 ± 0.017
42B-C Ln. mesenteroides 21 month MRS 300.4 ± 0.13
64C Lb. plantarum 115 dMRS 300.39 ± 0.027
63C Ln. mesenteroides 21 month M17 300.37 ± 0.033
86D Sc. thermophilus 13 months M17 450.35 ± 0.055
46D-C Ln. mesenteroides 23 monthsM17 30. MRS 300.34 ± 0.072

1D Sc. thermophilus 215 dM17 45<0.25
2D Sc. thermophilus 115 dM17 45<0.25
6C Ec. faecalis 1015 d, 1-2-3 monthsM17 30-45<0.25
7C Sc. thermophilus 224 hM17 45<0.25
9D Lb. coryniformis ssp. torquens 22 months M17 30<0.25
10C Sc. macedonicus 33 months M17 45<0.25
11C Sc. macedonicus 42 months M17 45<0.25
12D Sc. macedonicus 224 hM17 30-45<0.25
13D Sc. macedonicus 38 months M17 45<0.25
16D Lb. acidipiscis 116–8 monthsMRS (30, VAN)<0.25
27B Sc. thermophilus 12 months M17 45<0.25
30D Ec. faecalis 12 months M17 30<0.25
33C Lc. lactis cremoris 124 hM17 30<0.25
41D Ec. faecalis 22 months M17 30<0.25
47C Ln. mesenteroides 315 d, 2 monthsM17 30<0.25
48B Lc. lactis cremoris 21 month M17 30<0.25
56D Sc. macedonicus 23 months M17 45<0.25
57D Ln. mesenteroides 21 month M17 30<0.25
81B Lb. delbrueckii 12 months MRS 30<0.25
82B Sc. thermophilus 524 h, 1 monthM17 45<0.25
85D Sc. thermophilus 31 month M17 45<0.25
88C Sc. thermophilus 32 months M17 45<0.25
89C Sc. thermophilus 324 hM17 30<0.25
90B Sc. thermophilus 124 hM17 45<0.25
91B Sc. thermophilus 51-2 monthsM17 45<0.25
92B Sc. thermophilus 11 month M17 45<0.25
93B Sc. thermophilus 11 month M17 45<0.25
96B Sc. thermophilus 324 hM17 45<0.25
97C Sc. thermophilus 124 hM17 45<0.25

4. Discussion

In Italy the province of Trento has a long dairy history with various dairy biotechnological traditions arising from the geographical challenges of transport and communication between different alpine valleys and a diverse cultural heritage. A wide range of cheeses coexist, each with their own specific biotechnological processes, organoleptic characteristics, and history. A previous review has discussed the importance of preserving this type of traditional artisan cheese, usually made from raw cow's milk, because of their high microbial biodiversity and in particular high species richness of “wild” LAB with diverse metabolic activities and of great potential as dairy starters or even probiotic agents [8]. Previous work has shown that the “Nostrano-cheeses” contain high concentrations of GABA compared to other Italian cheeses [16] and it is known that LAB is responsible for producing GABA in cheese [15]. We, therefore, selected Trento “Nostrano-cheeses” for the screening and isolation of GABA-producing LAB. The successional development of the lactic microbiota of six“Nostrano-cheeses” from 24 hours to 8 months of ripening was characterised. 276 isolates belonging to dominant lactic microbiota were grouped into 97 clusters, identified to the species level, and screened for their GABA production. The milk used to produce these cheeses was the subject of a previous report [17] but in summary, the microbiological characterization was in agreement with microbial counts reported for other traditional Italian cow raw milk cheeses [6, 28, 29]. M17 and MRS were not perfectly selective, in agree with previous works [6, 30] in fact some nontarget isolations were recorded; for example, 2 Lc. lactis isolates amongst 13 were found on MRS agar plates and about 14% of all rod-shaped isolates were isolated on M17 agar plates. As commonly found in many raw milk cheeses [28-30], the microbial composition of the “Nostrano-cheeses” was dominated by LAB. Lb. paracasei was the most abundant species (31.9% of the isolates), followed by Sc. thermophilus and Ln. mesenteroides (18.1% and 16.3%, resp.). These species were amongst the dominant microbiota at all production stages; in particular, Sc. thermophilus dominated after 24 h until 2 months of ripening, while Lb. paracasei and Ln. mesenteroides reached their highest levels in the cheese after 15 days and remained at high levels until 3 months of ripening with a similar trend observed in microbial counts on MRS which started to decrease after 6 months of ripening, probably the result of microbial autolysis [31, 32]. Another 11 different LAB species were found in the cheese samples but none at a relative abundance higher than 5%. All species identified were previously recorded and very common in the dairy environment [4, 6, 28–30], with the exception of Lb. acidipiscis, which is a species described by Tanasupawat et al. [33] and isolated from fermented fish and has also been isolated more recently from traditional Greek cheeses [34]. RAPD analysis displayed a great genetic diversity amongst the isolates. In fact about 33% of the RADP clusters were singletons (one cluster for one isolate). This genetic biodiversity may reflect a real picture of the high species richness amongst the isolates collected from the cheeses but could also be consequence of the large number of strains analysed in this study. A similar result was found in a previous work, where 206 isolates from spontaneously fermented cheeses were analysed by RAPD PCR [30]. We compared all the clusters recovered from “Nostrano-cheeses” with those found in the corresponding milk samples and reported in a previous report [17] and no milk RAPD pattern was found amongst the 586 cheese clusters. This may be because the fermentation is not spontaneous but driven by a starter culture from the overnight skimmed milk that, even if natural and not commercial, may inhibit milk microbiota growth and development. It is worth highlighting that some isolates from different dairies grouped within the same cluster. The 9 species occurring in different dairies were Lb. paracasei, Lb. rhamnosus, and Ln. mesenteroides. These few coincident clusters occurred often in different dairy environments and might represent part of an endemic geocentric cheese microbiota, not necessarily coming from milk, but adapted to the cheese-making practice, ripening, and local microclimate and environmental conditions specific to the Trento alps. On the other hand, 34 of the 97 clusters were RAPD-PCR singletons and some species like Lb. coryniformis ssp. torquens, Lb. acidipiscis, Lb. curvatus, and Lb. delbrueckii were peculiar only for one of the three dairy factories. These aspects suggest that each manufacturing facility may also be characterized by a unique microbial population. Considering the recent interest in the gut-brain axis, the potential role of neurotransmitters like GABA in the periphery, and the immunological potential of systemic GABA, we screened the 97 dominant clusters for GABA producing strains [35]. A total of 68 GABA producing strains were identified. Previous studies by Siragusa et al. [15] and more recently by Diana et al. [36] found that sheep milk cheeses contained higher levels of GABA than cow's milk cheeses and consequently had higher numbers of GABA-producing LAB. The raw cow's milk cheeses subject of this current study showed higher amounts of GABA at the end of ripening [16] and a higher percent of GABA producer strains (71%) than these two previous studies where GABA producing strains were less than 14%. This difference may be due to the peculiar traditional environment of production of these Trento cheeses. However, it may also be the result of the cheese production times sampled. We screened the isolates starting at 24 h and followed the cheese LAB microbiota until the end of ripening. It is probable that microbial GABA production follows the same trend as the bacterial growth with higher number of GABA producing strains in the first 3 months followed by a rapid decrease in LAB numbers. Amongst the 68 positive strains, 13 GABA producing strains gave more than 4 mg/kg and belonged mainly to Lb. paracasei species but also to Lc. lactis, Lb. plantarum, Pc. pentosaceus, Lb. rhamnosus, and Sc. thermophilus. The ability to produce GABA has been reported in various LAB, in particular Lactobacillus sp. isolated from fermented food [37]. Lc. lactis and Sc. thermophilus were also found to produce GABA in different Italian cheeses screened by Siragusa et al. [15] and Pc. pentosaceus was isolated as high GABA producing strain from a Thai fermented meat [38]. From our screening, no Ec. faecalis or Sc. macedonicus strain was able to produce GABA (less than 0.25 mg/kg) and, to our knowledge, these species have never previously been identified as GABA producers. GABA is a desired bioactive compound because of its physiological functions such as neurotransmission, induction of hypotension, diuretic and tranquilizer effects, and stimulation of immune cells [10-12]. For these beneficial effects, GABA has been introduced in the diet as an oral supplement; the Japanese government defines the foods enriched with GABA as “foods for specified health use” [3]. Fermented milk enriched in GABA produced by lactobacilli may have commercial potential as a health-oriented dairy product. Siragusa et al. [15] observed that Lb. paracasei, Lb. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, Lc. lactis, Lb. plantarum, and Lb. brevis strains isolated from different Italian cheese varieties were the best GABA-producers during the fermentation of reconstituted skimmed milk. A Lb. casei and a Lc. lactis subsp. lactis were used for the manufacture of a GABA-enriched fermented milk: the first strain hydrolyzed milk protein into glutamic acid and the second converted glutamic acid into GABA, respectively [39]. This current study suggests a real potential of the Sc. thermophilus isolate from cluster 84C to produce GABA in fermented dairy products. A daily intake of fermented milk with an amount of 10 mg of GABA for 12 weeks has been shown to decrease blood pressure by 17.4 Hg in hypertensive patients [39]. Sc. thermophilus belonging to the cluster 84C in this current study produces 80 mg/kg of GABA. 125 mg of milk fermented with this strain could, therefore, be enough to obtain the daily intake necessary for a potential antihypertensive effect observed by Inoue et al. [39]. We are now examining the ability of this Sc. thermophilus strain to produce GABA in fermented milk, either alone or in association with other milk protein hydrolyzing LAB and under simulated gastrointestinal conditions.

5. Conclusions

This study describes the diverse lactic microbiota of traditional semihard “Nostrano-cheeses” from the Trento alps in Italy and how this microbiota changes during ripening. We have also characterised the potential of selected LAB isolates to produce GABA under controlled conditions, a molecule newly recognised as a putative food bioactive. We identified one Sc. thermophilus strain as a “high GABA producer” with considerable biotechnological potential for the development of new and attractive dairy products, an important commercial objective for increasing the potential of cheese as multifunctional dairy product.
  23 in total

Review 1.  Lactic acid bacterial cell factories for gamma-aminobutyric acid.

Authors:  Haixing Li; Yusheng Cao
Journal:  Amino Acids       Date:  2010-04-03       Impact factor: 3.520

2.  Differentiation of Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus paracasei and Lactobacillus rhamnosus by polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  L J Ward; M J Timmins
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.858

3.  Resident lactic acid bacteria in raw milk Canestrato Pugliese cheese.

Authors:  L Aquilanti; L Dell'Aquila; E Zannini; A Zocchetti; F Clementi
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.858

4.  Novel characteristic for distinguishing Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis from subsp. cremoris.

Authors:  M Nomura; H Kimoto; Y Someya; I Suzuki
Journal:  Int J Syst Bacteriol       Date:  1999-01

5.  Synthesis of gamma-aminobutyric acid by lactic acid bacteria isolated from a variety of Italian cheeses.

Authors:  S Siragusa; M De Angelis; R Di Cagno; C G Rizzello; R Coda; M Gobbetti
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Genotypic and phenotypic diversity of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. lactis strains of dairy origin.

Authors:  G Giraffa; C Andrighetto; C Antonello; M Gatti; C Lazzi; G Marcazzan; A Lombardi; E Neviani
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 5.277

Review 7.  Inherited disorders of GABA metabolism.

Authors:  C Jakobs; J Jaeken; K M Gibson
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.982

8.  Mosaic structure of large regions of the Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris chromosome.

Authors:  C Delorme; J J Godon; S D Ehrlich; P Renault
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 2.777

9.  Identification of Azospirillum strains by restriction fragment length polymorphism of the 16S rDNA and of the histidine operon.

Authors:  A Grifoni; M Bazzicalupo; C Di Serio; S Fancelli; R Fani
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  1995-03-15       Impact factor: 2.742

Review 10.  Antibiotic resistance in non-enterococcal lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria.

Authors:  Mohammed Salim Ammor; Ana Belén Flórez; Baltasar Mayo
Journal:  Food Microbiol       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 5.516

View more
  16 in total

1.  Reconstruction of the glutamate decarboxylase system in Lactococcus lactis for biosynthesis of food-grade γ-aminobutyric acid.

Authors:  Changjiang Lyu; Lili Yao; Qi Zhu; Jiaqi Mei; Yucheng Cao; Sheng Hu; Weirui Zhao; Jun Huang; Lehe Mei; Shanjing Yao; Guocheng Du
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  A Perspective Study of Koumiss Microbiome by Metagenomics Analysis Based on Single-Cell Amplification Technique.

Authors:  Guoqiang Yao; Jie Yu; Qiangchuan Hou; Wenyan Hui; Wenjun Liu; Lai-Yu Kwok; Bilige Menghe; Tiansong Sun; Heping Zhang; Wenyi Zhang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  Characterization of a Potential Probiotic Lactobacillus brevis RK03 and Efficient Production of γ-Aminobutyric Acid in Batch Fermentation.

Authors:  Chien-Hui Wu; Yi-Huang Hsueh; Jen-Min Kuo; Si-Jia Liu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Hydrogel Film-Immobilized Lactobacillus brevis RK03 for γ-Aminobutyric Acid Production.

Authors:  Yi-Huang Hsueh; Wen-Chang Liaw; Jen-Min Kuo; Chi-Shin Deng; Chien-Hui Wu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Production of Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid from Lactic Acid Bacteria: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Yanhua Cui; Kai Miao; Siripitakyotin Niyaphorn; Xiaojun Qu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Identification, Classification and Screening for γ-Amino-butyric Acid Production in Lactic Acid Bacteria from Cambodian Fermented Foods.

Authors:  Dalin Ly; Sigrid Mayrhofer; I B Agung Yogeswara; Thu-Ha Nguyen; Konrad J Domig
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2019-11-22

7.  Newly isolated lactic acid bacteria from silage targeting biofilms of foodborne pathogens during milk fermentation.

Authors:  Elizaveta Gavrilova; Elizaveta Anisimova; Alsu Gabdelkhadieva; Elena Nikitina; Adel Vafina; Dina Yarullina; Mikhail Bogachev; Airat Kayumov
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 3.605

8.  GABA-Producing Lactococcus lactis Strains Isolated from Camel's Milk as Starters for the Production of GABA-Enriched Cheese.

Authors:  Begoña Redruello; Yasmine Saidi; Lorena Sampedro; Victor Ladero; Beatriz Del Rio; Miguel A Alvarez
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-03-17

9.  Identification of 2-hydroxyisocaproic acid production in lactic acid bacteria and evaluation of microbial dynamics during kimchi ripening.

Authors:  Boyeon Park; Hyelyeon Hwang; Ji Yoon Chang; Sung Wook Hong; Se Hee Lee; Min Young Jung; Sung-Oh Sohn; Hae Woong Park; Jong-Hee Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Identification of Species and Subspecies of Lactic Acid Bacteria Present in Spanish Cheeses Type "Torta" by MALDI-TOF MS and pheS gene Analyses.

Authors:  Fernando Sánchez-Juanes; Vanessa Teixeira-Martín; José Manuel González-Buitrago; Encarna Velázquez; José David Flores-Félix
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-02-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.