Literature DB >> 25802069

No demonstrable benefit for coronal alignment outcomes in PSI knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

A Mannan1, T O Smith2, C Sagar3, N J London4, P J A Molitor3.   

Abstract

AIM: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies assessing alignment outcomes in patient-specific instrumented (PSI) knee arthroplasty was conducted.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: PRISMA compliant data was extracted from literature databases up to January 2014.
RESULTS: Twenty-six studies met the inclusion criteria, reporting a total of 1792 knees. Twenty-three studies reported alignment outcomes in the coronal plane, 11 in the sagittal plane. In all but three series, MRI was the preoperative imaging modality. Range of mean postoperative alignment (hip-knee-ankle [HKA] angle) was 176.5 to 181.70. The proportion of three degrees of outliers showed an overall mean of 18.6%. In total, fifteen studies compared alignment outcomes between standard and PSI. From these, four studies showed significantly higher accuracy of coronal plane alignment with PSI (HKA angle). Meta-analysis of seven high-quality comparative studies demonstrated no significant increased accuracy in postoperative mechanical axis (HKA angle) with PSI. Subgroup meta-analysis of both femoral and tibial rotation was not feasible due to a low number of inclusive high-quality series.
CONCLUSIONS: PSI knee arthroplasty is shown not to confer increased accuracy in reconstituting the postoperative mechanical axis. Further studies are required to demonstrate both clinical and radiological alignment outcomes in PSI knee arthroplasty with focus upon tibial and femoral rotation.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer-assisted surgery; Meta-analysis; Patient-specific instrumentation; Total knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25802069     DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.12.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res        ISSN: 1877-0568            Impact factor:   2.256


  7 in total

1.  Stability and alignment do not improve by using patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Nienke M Kosse; Petra J C Heesterbeek; Janneke J P Schimmel; Gijs G van Hellemondt; Ate B Wymenga; Koen C Defoort
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Comparison of Clinical, Functional, and Radiological Outcomes of Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Conventional and Patient-Specific Instrumentation.

Authors:  Soheil Mehdipour; Mohamad Qoreishi; Ali Keipourfard
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2020-09

3.  Comparative Study of Pinless Navigation System versus Conventional Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Prashant Pawar; Lokesh Naik; Dipit Sahu; Vaibhav Bagaria
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-04-12

4.  Postoperative alignment of TKA in patients with severe preoperative varus or valgus deformity: is there a difference between surgical techniques?

Authors:  Stefan Rahm; Roland S Camenzind; Andreas Hingsammer; Christopher Lenz; David E Bauer; Mazda Farshad; Sandro F Fucentese
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Conventional versus Smart Wireless Navigation in Total Knee Replacement: Similar Outcomes in a Randomized Prospective Study.

Authors:  Matteo Denti; Francesco Soldati; Francesca Bartolucci; Emanuela Morenghi; Laura De Girolamo; Pietro Randelli
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2018-06-20

6.  Postoperative mechanical alignment analysis of total knee replacement patients operated with 3D printed patient specific instruments: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Halil Can Gemalmaz; Kerim Sarıyılmaz; Okan Ozkunt; Mustafa Sungur; Ibrahim Kaya; Fatih Dikici
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 1.511

7.  Comparison of iASSIST Navigation System with Conventional Techniques in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Jun-Tan Li; Xiang Gao; Xu Li
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 2.071

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.