Literature DB >> 25801537

Verbal naming test for use with older adults: development and initial validation.

Brian P Yochim1, Sherry A Beaudreau1, J Kaci Fairchild1, Maya V Yutsis1, Neda Raymond1, Leah Friedman1, Jerome Yesavage1.   

Abstract

Naming or word-finding tasks are a mainstay of the typical neuropsychological evaluation, particularly with older adults. However, many older adults have significant visual impairment and there are currently no such word-finding tasks developed for use with older visually impaired populations. This study presents a verbal, non-visual measure of word-finding for use in the evaluation of older adults with possible dysnomia. Stimuli were chosen based on their frequency of usage in everyday spoken language. A 60-item scale was created and given to 131 older Veterans. Rasch analyses were conducted and differential item functioning assessed to eliminate poorly-performing items. The final 55-item scale had a coefficient alpha of 0.84 and correlated with the Neuropsychological Assessment Battery Naming test, r=0.84, p<.01, Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Category Fluency, r=0.45, p<.01, and the D-KEFS Letter Fluency, r=0.40, p<.01. ROC analyses found the measure to have sensitivity of 79% and specificity of 85% for detecting dysnomia. Patients with dysnomia performed worse on the measure than patients with intact word-finding, t(84)=8.2, p<.001. Patients with no cognitive impairment performed significantly better than patients with mild cognitive impairment, who performed significantly better than patients with dementia. This new measure shows promise in the neuropsychological evaluation of word-finding ability in older adults with or without visual impairment. Future directions include the development of a shorter version and the generation of additional normative data.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Sensitivity and specificity

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25801537     DOI: 10.1017/S1355617715000120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc        ISSN: 1355-6177            Impact factor:   2.892


  4 in total

1.  How common is truly benign MS in a UK population?

Authors:  Emma Clare Tallantyre; Paula C Major; Michael J Atherton; W Adam Davies; Fady Joseph; Valentina Tomassini; Trevor P Pickersgill; Katharine Elizabeth Harding; Mark Douglas Willis; Mia Winter; Neil P Robertson
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  A valid alternative for in-person language assessments in brain tumor patients: feasibility and validity measures of the new TeleLanguage test.

Authors:  Elke De Witte; Vitória Piai; Garret Kurteff; Ruofan Cai; Peter Mariën; Nina Dronkers; Edward Chang; Mitchel Berger
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2018-07-17

Review 3.  Cognitive Assessment via Telephone: A Scoping Review of Instruments.

Authors:  Anne R Carlew; Hudaisa Fatima; Julia R Livingstone; Caitlin Reese; Laura Lacritz; Cody Pendergrass; Kenneth Chase Bailey; Chase Presley; Ben Mokhtari; Colin Munro Cullum
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 2.813

4.  Patient Satisfaction with Telephone Neuropsychological Assessment.

Authors:  Laura H Lacritz; Anne R Carlew; Julia Livingstone; K Chase Bailey; Allison Parker; Aislinn Diaz
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 2.813

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.