| Literature DB >> 30177509 |
Emma Clare Tallantyre1,2, Paula C Major2, Michael J Atherton2, W Adam Davies2, Fady Joseph3, Valentina Tomassini4,2, Trevor P Pickersgill2, Katharine Elizabeth Harding4,2, Mark Douglas Willis4,2, Mia Winter5, Neil P Robertson4,2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The prevalence and definition of benign multiple sclerosis (BMS) remain controversial. Most definitions are based on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), not encompassing the wider impact of disease. The explanation for favourable outcomes remains unclear. We aim to provide a detailed characterisation of patients with low EDSS scores at long disease durations.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30177509 PMCID: PMC6581074 DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2018-318802
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry ISSN: 0022-3050 Impact factor: 10.154
Figure 1Flow chart illustrating cohort screening and selection. DD, disease duration; DMT, disease-modifying therapy; EDSS, Expanded Disability Status Scale; MS, multiple sclerosis.
Characteristics of participants according to EDSS
|
| EDSS | EDSS | EDSS |
| No of participants | 48 | 35 | 16 |
| Age, years | 58 (9.4) | 57 (9.3) | 55 (9.9) |
| Sex, n (%) female | 36 (75%) | 28 (80%) | 13 (81%) |
| Disease duration, years | 28 | 28 | 28 |
| Social deprivation (WIMD rank) | 1499 | 1490 | 1667 |
| Years in education | 15 | 15 | 15 |
| Predicted IQ | 108 | 107 | 109 |
| Employment affected by MS (%) | 25 (52%) | 14 (40%) | 5 (31%) |
| Marital divorce (%) | 18 (38%) | 12 (34%) | 6 (38%) |
| Parented a child (%) | 40 (83%) | 27 (77%) | 12 (75%) |
| BDI score | 7.7 | 6.4* | 5.1* |
| FAI severity score | 3.2 | 2.8* | 2.9 |
| MSIS-29 score | 45 | 40* | 35* |
| OABq symptom bother standard score | 23 | 20 | 12* |
| Number cognitively impaired (%) | 27 (57%) | 21 (60%) | 7 (44%) |
| Self-reported benign | 33 (69%) | 28 (80%)* | 15 (94%)* |
| Truly benign, n (%) | 9 (19%) | 9 (26%) | 9 (56%) |
BDI >13: clinically significant depression. FAI >4 indicates clinically significant fatigue. MSIS-29: normal range, 29–145; lower scores indicate less impact. OABq: higher symptom bother score indicates more symptom bother. WIMD: 1, most deprived; 1909, least deprived.
*Statistically significant difference compared with remainder of those assessed (p<0.01).
BDI, Beck Depression Index;EDSS, Expanded Disability Status Scale; FAI, Fatigue Assessment Instrument;MS, multiple sclerosis; MSIS-29, Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale;OABq, Overactive Bladder Questionnaire;WIMD, Welsh Index of Mass Deprivation;9-HPT, nine-hole peg test.
Figure 2A representation of the clinical cohort (n=60, selected based on disease duration >15 years and no history of DMT), according to whether an individual fulfilled (white) or failed to fulfil (black) each additional criterion for truly benign MS. Cognition: no cognitive impairment according to our criteria. Employment: no significant impact of MS on employment. EDSS: EDSS <3. Mood: no depressive symptoms (according to BDI). Fatigue: no clinically significant fatigue. EDSS, Expanded Disability Status Scale.
Figure 3Schematic diagram representing relapse history of 9 patients classified as having benign MS.
Characteristics of participants according to self-reported disease status (benign or not benign)
|
| Self-reported to be ‘benign’ MS | Self-reported to be ‘not benign’ MS |
| Age (mean, years) | 57 | 58 |
| Sex | 28 female (72%) | 17 female (81%) |
| Disease duration (mean, years) | 28 | 28 |
| WIMD | 1407 | 1194 |
| No cognitively impaired | 21 (54%) | 12 (57%) |
| Employment affected by MS | 16 (41%) | 15 (71%) |
| Comorbidity affecting normal activities | 7 (18%) | 4 (19%) |
| FAI severity score | 3 | 5* |
| OABq symptom bother standard score | 19 | 40* |
| BDI score | 7 | 16* |
| EDSS (median, range) | 2.0 (1.0–6.0) | 3.0 (1.5–6.0)* |
| Timed 25 foot walk (mean, s) | 4.6 | 5.3 |
| 9-HPT dominant hand (mean, s) | 21.1 | 22.7 |
| MS functional composite | 0.3 | 0.0 |
| MSIS-29 | 42 | 69* |
BDI >13: clinically significant depression. FAI >4 indicates clinically significant fatigue. MSIS-29: normal range, 29–145; lower scores indicate less impact. OABq: higher symptom bother score indicates more symptom bother; WIMD: 1, most deprived; 1909, least deprived.
*Statistically significant difference (p<0.01).
BDI, Beck Depression Index;EDSS, Expanded Disability Status Scale; FAI, Fatigue Assessment Instrument;MS, multiple sclerosis; MSIS-29, Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale–29;OABq, Overactive Bladder Questionnaire;WIMD, Welsh Index of Mass Deprivation;9-HPT, nine-hole peg test.