Literature DB >> 25801312

Identifying risk factors and protective factors for venous leg ulcer recurrence using a theoretical approach: A longitudinal study.

Kathleen Finlayson1, Min-Lin Wu2, Helen E Edwards3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The high recurrence rate of chronic venous leg ulcers has a significant impact on an individual's quality of life and healthcare costs.
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to identify risk and protective factors for recurrence of venous leg ulcers using a theoretical approach by applying a framework of self and family management of chronic conditions to underpin the study.
DESIGN: Secondary analysis of combined data collected from three previous prospective longitudinal studies.
SETTING: The contributing studies' participants were recruited from two metropolitan hospital outpatient wound clinics and three community-based wound clinics. PARTICIPANTS: Data were available on a sample of 250 adults, with a leg ulcer of primarily venous aetiology, who were followed after ulcer healing for a median follow-up time of 17 months after healing (range: 3-36 months).
METHODS: Data from the three studies were combined. The original participant data were collected through medical records and self-reported questionnaires upon healing and every 3 months thereafter. A Cox proportion-hazards regression analysis was undertaken to determine the influential factors on leg ulcer recurrence based on the proposed conceptual framework.
RESULTS: The median time to recurrence was 42 weeks (95% CI 31.9-52.0), with an incidence of 22% (54 of 250 participants) recurrence within three months of healing, 39% (91 of 235 participants) for those who were followed for six months, 57% (111 of 193) by 12 months, 73% (53 of 72) by two years and 78% (41 of 52) of those who were followed up for three years. A Cox proportional-hazards regression model revealed that the risk factors for recurrence included a history of deep vein thrombosis (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.07-2.67, p=0.024), history of multiple previous leg ulcers (HR 4.4, 95% CI 1.84-10.5, p=0.001), and longer duration (in weeks) of previous ulcer (HR 1.01, 95% CI 1.003-1.01, p<0.001); while the protective factors were elevating legs for at least 30min per day (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.19-0.56, p<0.001), higher levels of self-efficacy (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.92-0.99, p=0.016), and walking around for at least 3h/day (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.44-0.98, p=0.040).
CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study provide a comprehensive examination of risk and protective factors associated with leg ulcer recurrence based on the chronic disease self and family management framework. These results in turn provide essential steps towards developing and testing interventions to promote optimal prevention strategies for venous leg ulcer recurrence.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic disease; Protective factor; Recurrence; Risk factor; Venous leg ulcer

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25801312     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.02.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud        ISSN: 0020-7489            Impact factor:   5.837


  10 in total

1.  Epidemiology of venous leg ulcers in primary health care: Incidence and prevalence in a health centre-A time series study (2010-2014).

Authors:  Miriam Berenguer Pérez; Pablo López-Casanova; Raquel Sarabia Lavín; Héctor González de la Torre; José Verdú-Soriano
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-11-04       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  How and why patients self-treat chronic wounds.

Authors:  Suzanne Kapp; Nick Santamaria
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2017-08-06       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Predicting the likelihood of venous leg ulcer recurrence: The diagnostic accuracy of a newly developed risk assessment tool.

Authors:  Kathleen J Finlayson; Christina N Parker; Charne Miller; Michelle Gibb; Suzanne Kapp; Rajna Ogrin; Jacinta Anderson; Kerrie Coleman; Dianne Smith; Helen E Edwards
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 4.  Why Is Calculating the "True" Cost-to-Heal Wounds So Challenging?

Authors:  Marissa J Carter
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 4.947

5.  Cooling Intervention (MUSTCOOL) for Prevention of Lower Extremity Ulcer Recurrence: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Teresa J Kelechi; Mohan Madisetti; Margaret Prentice; Martina Mueller
Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs       Date:  2021 May-Jun 01       Impact factor: 1.970

6.  A service evaluation to examine the use of compression strapping for the management of patients with retromalleolar leg ulcers in a specialist community setting.

Authors:  Samantha Haynes; Samantha Holloway
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 3.099

7.  Pilot study of homologous platelet gel in venous ulcers.

Authors:  Mariele Gobo de Oliveira; Luciana Patricia Fernandes Abbade; Hélio Amante Miot; Rosana Rossi Ferreira; Elenice Deffune
Journal:  An Bras Dermatol       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.896

8.  Internal consistency and reliability of the Swiss-French translation of the venous leg ulcer self efficacy tool (VeLUSET).

Authors:  Sebastian Probst; Mathieu Turcotte; Monika Buehrer Skinner
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-08       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 9.  Improving Adherence to Wearing Compression Stockings for Chronic Venous Insufficiency and Venous Leg Ulcers: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Laila Bar; Susan Brandis; Darryn Marks
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 2.711

10.  Experiences of Venous Leg Ulcer persons following an individualised nurse-led education: protocol for a qualitative study using a constructivist grounded theory approach.

Authors:  Paul Bobbink; Philip J Larkin; Sebastian Probst
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 2.692

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.