Literature DB >> 33735146

Cooling Intervention (MUSTCOOL) for Prevention of Lower Extremity Ulcer Recurrence: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Teresa J Kelechi1,2,3,4, Mohan Madisetti1,2,3,4, Margaret Prentice1,2,3,4, Martina Mueller1,2,3,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to test our MUSTCOOL cooling patch intervention on the incidence of venous leg (VLU) and diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) recurrence over a previously healed wound.
DESIGN: A 6-month randomized controlled trial. SUBJECTS AND
SETTING: The target population was individuals with previously healed ulcers receiving care in outpatient wound centers in the Southeastern region of the United States. The sample comprised 140 individuals with recently healed ulcers; their average age was 62.4 years (SD = 12 years); 86 (61.4%) were male; and 47 (33.6%) were Black or African American.
METHODS: Participants were randomized to the MUSTCOOL or placebo patch. Both groups received instructions to apply the patch 3 times per week, and engage in standard of care including compression and leg elevation (VLU) or therapeutic footwear and hygiene (DFU). Demographic data were collected at baseline, and incidence measures taken at 1, 3, and 6 months. We also studied whether new ulcers developed on the adjacent leg or foot. Data were reported in frequencies/percentages.
RESULTS: One hundred seventeen participants (84%) were analyzed who completed 6 months of study participation. Thirteen percent (9/69) and 17% (12/69) developed a recurrent or new VLU, respectively; 29% (14/48) and 13% (6/48) developed a recurrent or new DFU, respectively. One person in the DFU group developed both a recurrent and new ulcer. For 9 recurrent VLUs, 6 (66.7%) recurred in the MUSTCOOL group and 3 (33.3%) receiving the placebo. Of the 15 recurrent DFUs (includes individual who developed both a recurrent and new ulcer), 10 (66.7%) recurred in the MUSTCOOL group and 5 (33.3%) receiving the placebo.
CONCLUSIONS: While the incidence of ulcer recurrent was slightly higher in the MUSTCOOL group, this finding was not considered clinically relevant. Overall ulcer recurrence during the 6-month study period was lower than reports in the literature, the time frame in which recurrence rates are highest. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was prospectively registered with ClinicalTrials.gov on December 10, 2015 (Identifier: NCT02626156)-https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02626156.
Copyright © 2021 by the Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33735146      PMCID: PMC8102322          DOI: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000753

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs        ISSN: 1071-5754            Impact factor:   1.970


  23 in total

1.  History of cryotherapy.

Authors:  Anatoli Freiman; Nathaniel Bouganim
Journal:  Dermatol Online J       Date:  2005-08-01

2.  Diabetes: foot ulcers and amputations.

Authors:  Dereck Hunt
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 3.292

3.  Symptoms Associated With Chronic Venous Disease in Response to a Cooling Treatment Compared to Placebo: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Teresa J Kelechi; Mary J Dooley; Martina Mueller; Mohan Madisetti; Margie A Prentice
Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs       Date:  2018 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 1.741

4.  Diagnosis and treatment of venous ulcers.

Authors:  Lauren Collins; Samina Seraj
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 3.292

Review 5.  Venous ulcer: epidemiology, physiopathology, diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Luciana P Fernandes Abbade; Sidnei Lastória
Journal:  Int J Dermatol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.736

6.  Amputations and foot-related hospitalisations disproportionately affect dialysis patients.

Authors:  Lawrence A Lavery; David C Lavery; Nathan A Hunt; Javier La Fontaine; Agbor Ndip; Andrew J Boulton
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 3.315

7.  Management of Patients With Venous Leg Ulcers: Challenges and Current Best Practice.

Authors:  Peter J Franks; Judith Barker; Mark Collier; Georgina Gethin; Emily Haesler; Arkadiusz Jawien; Severin Laeuchli; Giovanni Mosti; Sebastian Probst; Carolina Weller
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.072

Review 8.  Interventions to enhance patient compliance with leg ulcer treatment: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Ann Van Hecke; Maria Grypdonck; Tom Defloor
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 3.036

9.  Self-monitoring of lower leg skin temperature: accuracy of self-reported data and adherence to a cooling protocol for the prevention of venous leg ulcers.

Authors:  Teresa J Kelechi; Mohan Madisetti; Martina Mueller; Mary Dooley; Margaret Prentice
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 2.711

10.  Unilateral remote temperature monitoring to predict future ulceration for the diabetic foot in remission.

Authors:  Lawrence A Lavery; Brian J Petersen; David R Linders; Jonathan D Bloom; Gary M Rothenberg; David G Armstrong
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2019-08-06
View more
  1 in total

1.  Efficacy of a Self-managed Cooling Intervention for Pain and Physical Activity in Individuals With Recently Healed Chronic Venous Leg and Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Teresa J Kelechi; Martina Mueller; Mohan Madisetti; Margaret Prentice
Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 1.970

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.