Literature DB >> 25801112

Vacuum suction fixation versus staple fixation in TAPP laparoscopic hernia repair: introduction of a new technique for mesh fixation.

Guangyong Zhang1, Xiang Zhang2, Hanxiang Zhan1, Sanyuan Hu3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Proper mesh fixation is critical for successful TAPP laparoscopic hernia repair. Conventional mesh fixation may cause chronic neuralgia, groin paresthesia or other complications. This study aimed at introducing a new vacuum suction technique for mesh fixation and evaluating its efficacy and safety compared with traditional staple fixation way.
METHODS: Clinical data of 242 patients undergoing TAPP from July 2011 to March 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into vacuum suction fixation group and staple fixation group. The operation time, hospital stay, complications, recurrence, visual analogue scale pain score and cost were evaluated.
RESULTS: All surgeries were successful. The operation time of staple group was (42.34 ± 10.15) min for unilateral hernia and (64.08 ± 16.01) min for bilateral hernias. The postoperative hospital stay was (2.76 ± 0.84) days. One recurrence was observed (0.90%). For vacuum group, the operation time was (42.66 ± 7.76) min and (63.92 ± 10.49) min, and hospital stay was (2.60 ± 0.74) days. No recurrence was observed. There was no significant difference in recurrence, operation time, postoperative pain and hospital stay between two groups (P > 0.05). Average cost were (11,714 ± 726) RMB for vacuum group which was lower than staple group (14,837 ± 1568) RMB (P < 0.05). The top three complications of staple group were scrotal emphysema (10.81%), scrotal seroma (6.31%) and temporary nerve paresthesia (4.50%) while for vacuum group, they were scrotal seroma (3.82%), temporary nerve paresthesia (3.05%), scrotal emphysema (1.53%) and uroschesis (1.53%). The incidence of scrotal emphysema was lower in vacuum group (P < 0.05). No significant difference was observed in other complications (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Both techniques for mesh fixation are safe and effective. There is no significant difference in recurrence, operation time, postoperative pain or hospital stay. The vacuum suction fixation technique is more economical with lower incidence of scrotal emphysema.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Herniorrhaphy; Inguinal hernia; Laparoscopy; Mesh fixation; TAPP; Vacuum suction

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25801112     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4168-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  28 in total

Review 1.  Inguinal hernia repair: current surgical techniques.

Authors:  R Bittner; J Schwarz
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Prospective, comparative study of postoperative quality of life in TEP, TAPP, and modified Lichtenstein repairs.

Authors:  Igor Belyansky; Victor B Tsirline; David A Klima; Amanda L Walters; Amy E Lincourt; Todd B Heniford
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Use of fibrin sealant (Tisseel/Tissucol) in hernia repair: a systematic review.

Authors:  René H Fortelny; Alexander H Petter-Puchner; Karl S Glaser; Heinz Redl
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Use of human fibrin glue (Tissucol) versus staples for mesh fixation in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Federico Lovisetto; Sandro Zonta; Emanuela Rota; Massimiliano Mazzilli; Marco Bardone; Luca Bottero; Giuseppe Faillace; Mauro Longoni
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  The impact of atraumatic fibrin sealant vs. staple mesh fixation in TAPP hernia repair on chronic pain and quality of life: results of a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  R H Fortelny; A H Petter-Puchner; C May; W Jaksch; T Benesch; Z Khakpour; H Redl; K S Glaser
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Outcomes of staple fixation of mesh versus nonfixation in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ka-Wai Tam; Hung-Hua Liang; Chiah-Yang Chai
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Randomized double-blinded prospective trial of fibrin sealant spray versus mechanical stapling in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernioplasty.

Authors:  Melissa Shannon Chan; Chan Shannon Melissa; Anthony Yuen Bun Teoh; Teoh Anthony Yuen Bun; Kin Wing Chan; Chan Kin Wing; Yiu Chung Tang; Tang Yiu Chung; Enders Kwok Wai Ng; Ng Enders Kwok Wai; Hong Tat Leong; Leong Heng Tat
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Inguinodynia after two inguinal herniorrhaphy methods.

Authors:  Jose Bueno; Alfonso Serralta; Manuel Planells; David Rodero
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.719

9.  Randomized clinical trial of fibrin glue versus tacked fixation in laparoscopic groin hernia repair.

Authors:  Mette A Tolver; Jacob Rosenberg; Poul Juul; Thue Bisgaard
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Long-term results of a randomized clinical trial of Shouldice, Lichtenstein and transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repairs.

Authors:  M Butters; J Redecke; J Köninger
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  2 in total

1.  Ten golden rules for a safe MIS inguinal hernia repair using a new anatomical concept as a guide.

Authors:  Christiano Claus; Marcelo Furtado; Flavio Malcher; Leandro Totti Cavazzola; Edward Felix
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Mesh Displacement After Bilateral Inguinal Hernia Repair With No Fixation.

Authors:  Christiano Marlo Paggi Claus; Gabriela Moreira Rocha; Antonio Carlos Ligocki Campos; João Augusto Nocera Paulin; Julio Cesar Uili Coelho
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.