A S-W Wong1, T T-H Lao1, C W Cheung1, S W Yeung1, H L Fan1, P S Ng2, P M Yuen3, D S Sahota1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong City, Hong Kong. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Union Hospital, Hong Kong City, Hong Kong. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong City, Hong Kong.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) measurement of endometrial thickness (ET) in diagnosing endometrial cancer in postmenopausal women with vaginal bleeding (PMB). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: One-stop PMB clinic in a Hong Kong teaching hospital. POPULATION: A cohort of 4383 women with PMB. METHODS: Transvaginal ultrasonic measurement of ET and endometrial biopsies were obtained in women presenting with PMB between 2002 and 2013. Endometrial histology was used as the reference standard to calculate accuracy estimates. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Accuracy data for TVS ET presented as sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: Endometrial cancer was diagnosed in 3.8% of women. The median ET in those with endometrial cancer was significantly higher than those with benign conditions (15.7 versus 3.2 mm, P < 0.001). The area under the ROC curve was 0.92 (95% CI 0.89-0.94). The sensitivity for the detection of endometrial cancer at 3-, 4-, and 5-mm cut-offs were 97.0% (95% CI 94.5-99.6%), 94.1% (95% CI 90.5-97.6%), and 93.5% (95% CI 89.7-97.2%), respectively. The corresponding estimates of specificity at these thresholds were 45.3% (95% CI 43.8-46.8%), 66.8% (65.4-68.2%), and 74.0% (72.7-75.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Transvaginal ultrasound using a 3-mm cut-off has high sensitivity for detecting endometrial cancer and can identify women with PMB who are highly unlikely to have endometrial cancer, thereby avoiding more invasive endometrial biopsy.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) measurement of endometrial thickness (ET) in diagnosing endometrial cancer in postmenopausal women with vaginal bleeding (PMB). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: One-stop PMB clinic in a Hong Kong teaching hospital. POPULATION: A cohort of 4383 women with PMB. METHODS: Transvaginal ultrasonic measurement of ET and endometrial biopsies were obtained in women presenting with PMB between 2002 and 2013. Endometrial histology was used as the reference standard to calculate accuracy estimates. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Accuracy data for TVS ET presented as sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS:Endometrial cancer was diagnosed in 3.8% of women. The median ET in those with endometrial cancer was significantly higher than those with benign conditions (15.7 versus 3.2 mm, P < 0.001). The area under the ROC curve was 0.92 (95% CI 0.89-0.94). The sensitivity for the detection of endometrial cancer at 3-, 4-, and 5-mm cut-offs were 97.0% (95% CI 94.5-99.6%), 94.1% (95% CI 90.5-97.6%), and 93.5% (95% CI 89.7-97.2%), respectively. The corresponding estimates of specificity at these thresholds were 45.3% (95% CI 43.8-46.8%), 66.8% (65.4-68.2%), and 74.0% (72.7-75.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Transvaginal ultrasound using a 3-mm cut-off has high sensitivity for detecting endometrial cancer and can identify women with PMB who are highly unlikely to have endometrial cancer, thereby avoiding more invasive endometrial biopsy.
Authors: Megan A Clarke; Beverly J Long; Arena Del Mar Morillo; Marc Arbyn; Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez; Nicolas Wentzensen Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Min Kyoung Kim; Yeon Soo Jung; Seung Joo Chon; Bo Hyon Yun; Sihyun Cho; Young Sik Choi; Byung Seok Lee; Seok Kyo Seo Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Kelechi Njoku; Davide Chiasserini; Eleanor R Jones; Chloe E Barr; Helena O'Flynn; Anthony D Whetton; Emma J Crosbie Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2020-11-03 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Norbert Stachowicz; Agata Smoleń; Michał Ciebiera; Tomasz Łoziński; Paweł Poziemski; Dariusz Borowski; Artur Czekierdowski Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2021-03-04